Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper explores how metaphors are employed in jihadist magazines to promote a dichotomist worldview of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, ‘east’ versus ‘west’ and ‘right’ versus ‘wrong’. It argues that juxtapositions in both language and thought help writers to reaffirm and/or challenge certain paradigms. The approach uses critical metaphor analysis (Charteris-Black 2004) to investigate qualitative evidence of conceptual metaphors, focusing on the domains , and . Dichotomous language in these domains (e.g., ‘seed’ versus ‘weed’; ‘sheep’ versus ‘wolves’; the ‘spark of Jihad’ versus the ‘shadow’ of Western governments) helps to position extremist groups on the right side of a number of paradigms. The use of binary metaphors also permits simultaneously conflicting conceptualisations; for instance, jihadists are both innocent victims and merciless defenders of their faith, depending on with whom or what they are juxtaposed. The research concludes that the use of binary metaphors serves to underscore entrenched paradigms of ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, thus allowing the writers to frame their discourse in a way that justifies and promotes their extremist agenda.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aggarwal, Neil K.
    2019Media Persuasion in the Islamic State. Columbia: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/agga18238
    https://doi.org/10.7312/agga18238 [Google Scholar]
  2. Albtoush, Mohammad A., and Sakina S. Sahuri
    2017 “Beyond Predator and Prey: Figuring Corruption through Animal Metaphoric Scenarios in the Jordanian Context.” English Language and Literature Studies7 (2): 110. 10.5539/ells.v7n2p110
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v7n2p110 [Google Scholar]
  3. Asher, Jeffrey R.
    2001 “Σπειρεται: Paul’s Anthropogenic Metaphor in 1 Corinthians 15: 42–44.” Journal of Biblical Literature120 (1): 101–122. 10.2307/3268595
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3268595 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul, Rachelle Vessey, and Tony McEnery
    2021The Language of Violent Jihad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108363365
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363365 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey
    2018 “A Corpus-Driven Comparison of English and French Islamist Extremist Texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics23 (3): 255–278. 10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
    2012 “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics34 (3): 255–278. 10.1093/applin/ams048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048 [Google Scholar]
  7. Benigni, Matthew C., Kenneth Joseph, and Kathleen M. Carley
    2017 “Online Extremism and the Communities that Sustain it: Detecting the ISIS Supporting Community on Twitter.” PLoS ONE12 (12), e0181405. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181405
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181405 [Google Scholar]
  8. Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel, and Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
    . (forth. 2022) “A Detailed Analysis of Discursive Pathos through the Emotion/Opinion Interplay in Jihadist Magazines.” Pragmatics and Society. Special issue: Approaches to Discourse of Terror.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
    2020 “Correlation, Collocation, and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse & Society31 (4): 351–373. 10.1177/0957926520903528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903528 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, Gerard J. Steen, and Marlies, A. R. Iepsma
    2015 “Making Ads less Complex, Yet More Creative and Persuasive: The Effects of Conventional Metaphors and Irony in Print Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising34 (3): 515–532. 10.1080/02650487.2014.996200
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996200 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2006The Communication of Leadership: The Design of Leadership Style. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203968291
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968291 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2018aFire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2018bAnalysing Political Speeches. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2019Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28768‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chilton, Paul A.
    2004Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  18. Christie, Nils
    1986 “The Ideal Victim.” InFrom Crime Policy to Victim Policy, ed. byEzzat A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑08305‑3_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Downing, Joseph
    2019 “Blurring European and Islamic Values or Brightening the Good–Bad Muslim Dichotomy? A Critical Analysis of French Muslim Victims of Jihadi Terror Online on Twitter and in Le Monde Newspaper.” Critical Studies on Terrorism12 (2): 250–272. 10.1080/17539153.2019.1573038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1573038 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunning, Ted
    1993 “Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence.” Computational Linguistics19 (1): 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Sharif, Ahmad
    2016 “A Theoretical Account on the Study of Metaphor in Didactic Discourse.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies7 (2): 100–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society3 (2): 193–217. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandez, Miriam, and Harith Alani
    2021 “Artificial Intelligence and Online Extremism.” InPredicting Policing and Artificial Intelligence, ed. byJ. McDaniel and K. Pease, 132–163. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429265365‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429265365-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Forceville, Charles J., and Thijs Renckens
    2013 “The Good is Light and Bad is Dark Metaphor in Feature Films.” Metaphor and the Social World3 (2): 160–179. 10.1075/msw.3.2.03for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.03for [Google Scholar]
  25. Grice, H. P.
    1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Halmari, Sirkka H.
    1990 “On Dichotomous Political Rhetoric: With Special Reference to Ronald Reagan’s Language.” Unpublished thesis. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1567&context=etd-project
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haslam, Nick
    2006 “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review10 (3): 252–264. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hegghammer, Thomas
    (ed.) 2017Jihadi Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139086141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139086141 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hervik, Peter
    2019 “Ritualized Opposition in Danish Online Practices of Extremist Language and Thought.” International Journal of Communication131: 3104–3121.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, and Blanca Kraljevic-Mujic
    2017 “Metaphor and Persuasion in Commercial Advertising.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. byElena Semino and Zsófia Demjén, 323–336. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Houck, Shannon C., Meredith A. Repke, and Lucian G. Conway
    2017 “Understanding what Makes Terrorist Groups’ Propaganda Effective: An Integrative Complexity Analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda.” Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism12 (2): 105–118. 10.1080/18335330.2017.1351032
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2017.1351032 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jäkel, Olaf
    2002 “Hypotheses Revisited: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor Applied to Religious Texts.” Metaphorik.de2 (1): 20–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeffries, Lesley
    2010Opposition in Discourse: The Construction of Oppositional Meaning. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnston, Amanda K.
    2009 “Assessing the Effectiveness of Deradicalization Programs for Islamist Extremists.” Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36698137.pdf
  35. Kilp, Alar
    2011 “The Ontology and Epistemology of Extremism.” Estonian National Defence College Proceedings14 (2): 9–25. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319256635_THE_ONTOLOGY_AND_EPISTEMOLOGY_OF_EXTREMISM
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kirkwood, Rachel J.
    2019 “‘Stand still in the Light’: What Conceptual Metaphor Research Can Tell Us about Quaker Theology.” Religions10 (1): 41. 10.3390/rel10010041
    https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010041 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of Philosophy77 (8): 453–486. 10.2307/2025464
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lawther, Cheryl
    2014 “The Construction and Politicisation of Victimhood”. InVictims of Terrorism: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Study, ed. byO. Lynch and J. Argomaniz, 10–31. London: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9780203725320‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203725320-2 [Google Scholar]
  39. Levy, Arnon, and Peter Godfrey-Smith
    (eds.) 2019The Scientific Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Macdonald, Stuart, Nyasha Maravanyika, David Nezri, Elliot Parry, and Kate Thomas
    2018 “Online Jihadist Magazines and the ‘Religious Terrorism’ Thesis.” Critical Studies on Terrorism11 (3): 537–550. 10.1080/17539153.2018.1471098
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1471098 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marcellino, William M., Kim Cragin, Joshua Mendelsohn, Andrew M. Cady, Madeline Magnuson, and Kathleen Reedy
    2016 “Measuring the Popular Resonance of Daesh’s Propaganda.” Journal of Strategic Security10 (1): 32. 10.5038/1944‑0472.10.1.1527
    https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.10.1.1527 [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin, Paul C.
    2013 “The Exploratory and Reflective Domain of Metaphor in the Comparison of Religions.” Zygon48 (4): 936–965. 10.1111/zygo.12054
    https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12054 [Google Scholar]
  43. Matusitz, Jonathan, and James O. Olufowote
    2016 “Visual Motifs in Islamist Terrorism: Applying Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Journal of Applied Security Research11 (1): 18–32. 10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276 [Google Scholar]
  44. Miller, Ben, Weeda Mehran, Yassin K. Alsahlani, and Harron Qahtan
    2019 “Metaphors of Radicalization: A Computational and Qualitative Analysis of Jihadi Propaganda.” InOnline Terrorist Propaganda, Recruitment, and Radicalization, ed. byJohn R. Vacca, 215–225. CRC Press. 10.1201/9781315170251‑14
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315170251-14 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mölder, Holger
    2011 “The Culture of Fear in International Politics – A Western-Dominated International System and Its Extremist Challenges.” KVÜÕA toimetised141: 241–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Naser, Hayder S., and Ali B. Mohammed
    2020 “The Persuasive Power of Religious Metaphor in Selected Qur’anic and Biblical Verses.” Al-Adab Journal2 (135): 11–32. 10.31973/aj.v2i135.816
    https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i135.816 [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Regan, John, and Betzel, Anne
    2015Critical Discourse Analysis: A Sample Study of Extremism. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Patterson, Katie J.
    2020 “The Path to Jihad: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Religious Conceptualisations in Jihadist Magazines.” Cambridge Open Engage. 10.33774/coe‑2020‑nc1d5
    https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2020-nc1d5 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2022 (in press) “Under the Shadow of Swords: The Rhetoric of Jihad. A Corpus Based Critical Analysis of Religious Metaphors in Jihadist Magazines.” Pragmatics and Society, Special issue: Approaches to Discourse of Terror. 10.1075/ps.21017.pat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21017.pat [Google Scholar]
  50. Prentice, Sheryl, Paul Rayson, and Paul J. Taylor
    2012 “The Language of Islamic Extremism: Towards an Automated Identification of Beliefs, Motivations, and Justifications.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17 (2): 259–286. 10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre [Google Scholar]
  51. Ranstorp, Magnus
    1996 “Terrorism in the Name of Religion.” Journal of International Affairs50 (1): 41–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schwager, Elaine
    2004 “Transforming Dualism and the Metaphor of Terror, Part I: From Genocidal to Dialogic Mentality: An Intergenerational Struggle.” The Psychoanalytic Review91 (3): 347–394. 10.1521/prev.91.3.347.38300
    https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.91.3.347.38300 [Google Scholar]
  53. Scott, Mike
    2012 WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd. Available at: https://lexically.net
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Siddiqui, Abdul H.
    2008 “Translation of Sahih Muslim.” University of Southern Carolina Centre for Muslim-Jewish Engagement. Available at: www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim
  55. Tannen, Deborah
    2002 “Agonism in Academic Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (10–11): 1651–1669. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00079‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00079-6 [Google Scholar]
  56. Thornton, Pip
    2015 “The Meaning of Light: Seeing and Being on the Battlefield.” Cultural Geographies22 (4): 567–583. 10.1177/1474474015595795
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474015595795 [Google Scholar]
  57. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2005 “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” InLanguage and Peaceed. byChristina Schäffner and Anita Wenden, 41–58. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies11 (2): 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2019 “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues.” InComparative Perspectives on Racismed. byJessika ter Wal and Maykel Verkuyten, 91–115. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315196374‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196374-5 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wodak, Ruth
    2006 “Mediation between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA.” Discourse Studies8 (1): 179–190. 10.1177/1461445606059566
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566 [Google Scholar]
  61. Prevent Strategy

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical metaphor analysis; extremism; jihadism; metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error