1887
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper addresses the specificities of online hate speech against the Afro-descendant, Roma, and LGBTQ+ communities in Portugal. The research is based on the analysis of CO-HATE, a corpus composed of 20,590 YouTube comments, which were manually annotated following detailed guidelines created for that purpose. We applied methods from corpus linguistics to assess the prevalence of overt and covert hate speech, counter-speech, and offensive speech, considering different grounds of discrimination, and to investigate the main linguistic and rhetorical strategies underlying hatred messages. The research results highlight the importance of tackling covert hate speech, a recurring phenomenon often anchored in irony and fallacious argumentation, including the emotional appeal to fear and the implicit call to action. We believe this study will aid in advancing the analysis of online hate speech, while promoting the development of efficient automated detection models, specifically regarding the Portuguese language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00085.car
2023-06-19
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achim, Viorel
    2004The Roma in Romanian History. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press. 10.1515/9786155053931
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155053931 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhtar, Sohail, Valerio Basile, and Viviana Patti
    2020 “Modeling Annotator Perspective and Polarized Opinions to Improve Hate Speech Detection.” InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 151–154. 10.1609/hcomp.v8i1.7473
    https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v8i1.7473 [Google Scholar]
  3. Albelda Marco, Marta
    2022 “Rhetorical Questions as Reproaching Devices.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 10.1075/jlac.00077.alb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00077.alb [Google Scholar]
  4. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar
    2017Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-analytic Perspective. New York: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72604‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Attardo, Salvatore
    2020 “Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics32(6): 793–826. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baider, Fabienne
    2020 “Pragmatics lost?: Overview, Synthesis and Proposition in Defining Online Hate Speech.” Pragmatics and Society11(2): 196–218. 10.1075/ps.20004.bai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20004.bai [Google Scholar]
  7. 2022 “Covert Hate Speech, Conspiracy Theory and Anti-semitism: Linguistic Analysis versus Legal Judgment.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law35(6): 2347–2371. 10.1007/s11196‑022‑09882‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09882-w [Google Scholar]
  8. Baider, Fabienne, and Christina Romain
    . Forthcoming. “Irony, Sarcasm and other Playful Devices Used in Online Covert Hate Speech.” Language and Social Life, de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baider, Fabienne, Anna Constantinou, and Anastasia Petrou
    2017 “Metaphors Related to Othering the Non-natives”. InOnline Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, edited byStavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar, 38–42. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baider, Fabienne, and Maria Constantinou
    2020 “Covert Hate Speech: A Contrastive Study of Greek and Greek Cypriot Online Discussions with an Emphasis on Irony.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict8(2): 262–287. 10.1075/jlac.00040.bai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00040.bai [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
    2005 “A Corpus-based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics4(2): 197–226. 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  12. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  13. Basile, Valerio, Cristina Bosco, Elisabetta Fersini, Debora Nozza, Viviana Patti, Francisco Pardo, Paolo Rosso, and Manuela Sanguinetti
    2019 “SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech against Immigrants and Women in Twitter.” InProceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 54–63. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/S19‑2007
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ben Chikha, Fourat
    2021Combating Rising Hate against LGBTI People in Europe. tiny.cc/kod6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Benesch, Susan, Derek Ruths, Kelly Dillon, Haji Mohammad Saleem, and Lucas Wright
    2016 “Counterspeech on Twitter: A Field Study.” A Report for Public Safety Canada under the Kanishka Project. 10.15868/socialsector.34066
    https://doi.org/10.15868/socialsector.34066 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bhat, Prashanth, and Ofra Klein
    2020 “Covert Hate Speech: White Nationalists and Dog Whistle Communication on Twitter.” InTwitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation, edited byGwen Bouvier, and Judith E. Rosenbaum, 151–172. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑41421‑4_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Billig, Michael
    2001 “Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan.” Discourse & Society12(3): 267–289. 10.1177/0957926501012003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Breazu, Petre, and David Machin
    2019 “Racism toward the Roma through the Affordances of Facebook: Bonding, Laughter and Spite.” Discourse & Society30(4): 376–394. 10.1177/0957926519837396
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519837396 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2022 “Using Humor to Disguise Racism in Television News: The Case of the Roma.” HUMOR35(1). 10.1515/humor‑2021‑0104
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2021-0104 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brindle, Andrew
    2016The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language. New York and London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731643
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731643 [Google Scholar]
  21. Buturoiu, Dana Raluca, and Nicoleta Corbu
    2020 “Exposure to Hate Speech in the Digital Age. Effects on Stereotypes about Roma People.” Journal of Media Research13(2). 10.24193/jmr.37.1
    https://doi.org/10.24193/jmr.37.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cádima, Francisco Rui, Carla Baptista, Marisa Silva, and Patrícia Abreu
    2021Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, The Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia & Turkey in the Year 2020. Country Report: Portugal. 10.2870/818313
    https://doi.org/10.2870/818313 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carter, Evelyn R., and Mary C. Murphy
    2015 “Group-based Differences in Perceptions of Racism: What Counts, to Whom, and Why?.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass9(6): 269–280. 10.1111/spc3.12181
    https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12181 [Google Scholar]
  24. Casa-Nova, Maria José
    2021 “Reflecting on Public Policies for Portuguese Roma since Implementation of the NRIS: Theoretical and Practical Issues.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies29(1): 20–32. 10.1080/14782804.2021.1877119
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1877119 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chovanec, Jan
    2021 “‘Re-educating the Roma? You Must Be Joking…’: Racism and Prejudice in Online Discussion Forums.” Discourse & Society32(2): 156–174. 10.1177/0957926520970384
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970384 [Google Scholar]
  26. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe 2021Combating Racism and Racial Discrimination against People of African Descent in Europe. Round-table with Human Rights Defenders Organised by the Office of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. tiny.cc/ood6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dahiya, Snehil, Shalini Sharma, Dhruv Sahnan, Vasu Goel, Emilie Chouzenoux, Víctor Elvira, Angshul Majumdar, Anil Bandhakavi, and Tanmoy Chakraborty
    2021 “Would your Tweet Invoke Hate on the Fly? Forecasting Hate Intensity of Reply Threads on Twitter.” InProceedings of the ACM SIGKDD 2021, 2732–2742. Virtual Event Singapore: ACM. 10.1145/3447548.3467150
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467150 [Google Scholar]
  28. Davidson, Thomas, Dana Warmsley, Michael Macy, and Ingmar Weber
    2017 “Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language.” InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 512–515. Montreal, Canada: AAAI. 10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955
    https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dynel, Marta
    2017 “Academics vs. American Scriptwriters vs. Academics: A Battle over the Etic and Emic ‘Sarcasm’ and ‘Irony’ Labels.” Language & Communication551: 69–87. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2018aIrony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501507922
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018b “Deconstructing the Myth of Positively Evaluative Irony.” InThe Pragmatics of Irony and Banter, edited byManuel Jobert, and Sandrine Sorlin, 1–17. Berlin: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.30.03dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.03dyn [Google Scholar]
  32. 2019 “Ironic Intentions in Action and Interaction.” Language Sciences751: 1–14. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. ElSherief, Mai, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi, Jordyn Seybolt, Munmun De Choudhury, and Diyi Yang
    2021 “Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech.” InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 345–363. Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp‑main.29
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.29 [Google Scholar]
  34. Erjavec, Karmen
    2001 “Media Representation of the Discrimination against the Roma in Eastern Europe: The Case of Slovenia.” Discourse & Society12(6): 699–727. 10.1177/0957926501012006001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006001 [Google Scholar]
  35. European Commission
    European Commission 2018aAfrophobia: Acknowledging and Understanding the Challenges to Ensure Effective Responses. tiny.cc/lpd6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  36. European Commission
    European Commission 2018bAntigypsyism: Increasing its Recognition to Better Understand and Address its Manifestations. tiny.cc/rpd6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ECRI
    ECRI 2018ECRI General Policy Recommendation N°7 (revised) on National Legislation to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination. tiny.cc/uqd6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  38. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
    European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2020A Long Way to Go for LGBTQ Equality. tiny.cc/3qd6vz
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Fortuna, Paula, João Silva, Juan Soler Company, Leo Wanner, and Sérgio Nunes
    2019 “A Hierarchically-labeled Portuguese Hate Speech Dataset.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online4–104. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W19‑3510
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3510 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fortuna, Paula, and Sérgio Nunes
    2018 “A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text.” ACM Computing Surveys51(4): 1–30. 10.1145/3232676
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3232676 [Google Scholar]
  41. Geyer, Klaus, Eckhard Bick, and Andrea Kleene
    2022 “‘I Am No Racist, but…’: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Xenophobic Hate Speech Constructions in Danish and German Social Media Discourse.” InThe Grammar of Hate: Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse, edited byNatalia Knoblock, 241–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108991841.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108991841.013 [Google Scholar]
  42. Habernal, Ivan, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych, and Benno Stein
    2018 “Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation.” InProceedings of the NAACL HLT 2018, 386–396, New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/N18‑1036
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1036 [Google Scholar]
  43. Han, Chung-hye
    2002 “Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions.” Lingua112(3): 201–229. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(01)00044‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hancock Alfaro, Ange-Marie
    2022 “When Words don’t Disappear: An Intersectional Analysis of Hate Speech.” InCitizenship on the Edge: Sex/Gender/Race, edited byNancy J. Hirschmann, and Deborah A. Thomas, 19–40. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9780812298284‑002
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298284-002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hill, Jane H.
    2008The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304732
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304732 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ho, Janet
    2021 “Metaphors, Powerlessness and Online Aggression: How Wuhan Lockdown Escapees were Dehumanised during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict111: 77–100. 10.1075/jlac.00073.ho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00073.ho [Google Scholar]
  47. Hodson, Gordon, and Cara C. MacInnis
    2016 “Derogating Humor as a Delegitimization Strategy in Intergroup Contexts.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science2(1): 63–74. 10.1037/tps0000052
    https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000052 [Google Scholar]
  48. Krobová, Tereza, and Jan Zàpotocký
    2021 “‘I Am Not Racist, But…’: Rhetorical Fallacies in Arguments about the Refugee Crisis on Czech Facebook.” Journal of Intercultural Communication21(2): 58–69. 10.36923/jicc.v21i2.14
    https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v21i2.14 [Google Scholar]
  49. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Mats Ekström
    2022 “The Normalization of Far-right Populism and Nativist Authoritarianism: Discursive Practices in Media, Journalism and the Wider Public Sphere/s.” Discourse & Society33(6): 719–729. 10.1177/09579265221095406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumar, Ritesh, Atul Kr. Ojha, Shervin Malmasi, and Marcos Zampieri
    2018 “Benchmarking Aggression Identification in Social Media.” InProceedings of the First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC-2018), 1–11, Santa Fe, New Mexico: USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Leite, João, Diego Silva, Kalina Bontcheva, and Carolina Scarton
    2020 “Toxic Language Detection in Social Media for Brazilian Portuguese: New Dataset and Multilingual Analysis”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04543.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Maeso, R. Silvia
    2021O Estado do Racismo em Portugal: Racismo Antinegro e Anticiganismo no Direito e nas Políticas Públicas. Lisbon: Tinta-da-China.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Macagno, Fabrizio
    2022 “Argumentation Profiles and the Manipulation of Common Ground. The Arguments of Populist Leaders on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics1911: 67–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022 [Google Scholar]
  54. Magano, Olga, and Maria Manuela Mendes
    2021 “Structural Racism and Racialization of Roma/Ciganos in Portugal: The Case of Secondary School Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Social Sciences10(6): 1–14. 10.3390/socsci10060203
    https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060203 [Google Scholar]
  55. Magu, Rijul, and Jiebo Luo
    2018 “Determining Code Words in Euphemistic Hate Speech Using Word Embedding Networks.” InProceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2), 93–100. Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W18‑5112
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5112 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mathew, Binny, Navish Kumar, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee
    2018 “Analyzing the Hate and Counter Speech Accounts on Twitter.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02712.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
    2011Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 [Google Scholar]
  58. McEnery, Tony, and Vaclav Brezina
    2022Fundamental Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107110625
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107110625 [Google Scholar]
  59. Munt, Sally R.
    2019 “Gay Shame in a Geopolitical Context.” Cultural Studies33(2): 223–248. 10.1080/09502386.2018.1430840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1430840 [Google Scholar]
  60. Paz, María Antonia, Julio Montero-Díaz, and Alicia Moreno-Delgado
    2020 “Hate Speech: A Systematized Review.” Sage Open10(4). 10.1177/2158244020973022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022 [Google Scholar]
  61. De Pelle, Rogers Prates, and Viviane Moreira
    2017 “Offensive Comments in the Brazilian Web: A Dataset and Baseline Results.” InProceedings of BraSNAM. Porto Alegre. SBC. 10.5753/brasnam.2017.3260
    https://doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2017.3260 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pohjonen, Matti, and Sahana Udupa
    2017 “Extreme Speech Online: An Anthropological Critique of Hate Speech Debates.” International Journal of Communication111: 1173–1191.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Poletto, Fabio, Valerio Basile, Manuela Sanguinetti, Cristina Bosco, and Viviana Patti
    2021 “Resources and Benchmark Corpora for Hate Speech Detection: A Systematic Review.” Language Resources and Evaluation55(2): 477–523. 10.1007/s10579‑020‑09502‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09502-8 [Google Scholar]
  64. Poletto, Fabio, Marco Stranisci, Manuela Sanguinetti, Viviana Patti, and Cristina Bosco
    2017 “Hate Speech Annotation: Analysis of an Italian Twitter Corpus.” InProceedings of CLiC-It 2017, edited byRoberto Basili, Malvina Nissim, and Giorgio Satta, 263–68. Academia University Press. 10.4000/books.aaccademia.2448
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.2448 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rieger, Diana, Anna Sophie, Maximilian Wich, Toni Kiening, and Georg Groh
    2021 “Assessing the Extent and Types of Hate Speech in Fringe Communities: A Case Study of Alt-right Communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit.” Social Media + Society7(4). 10.1177/20563051211052906
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211052906 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sanguinetti, Manuela, Fabio Poletto, Cristina Bosco, Viviana Patti, and Marco Stranisci
    2018 “An Italian Twitter Corpus of Hate Speech against Immigrants.” InProceedings of the LREC 2018, 2798–2805. Miyazaki, Japan: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Schmidt, Anna, and Michael Wiegand
    2017 “A Survey on Hate Speech Detection Using Natural Language Processing.” InProceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, 1–10. Valencia, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W17‑1101
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1101 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sellars, Andrew
    2016 “Defining Hate Speech.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication 2016–20: Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research. 10.2139/ssrn.2882244
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882244 [Google Scholar]
  69. Serafis, Dimitris, Franco Zappettini, and Stavros Assimakopoulos
    2023 “The Institutionalization of Hatred Politics in the Mediterranean: Studying Corpora of Online News Portals during the European ‘Refugee Crisis’.” Topoi (2023): 1–20. 10.1007/s11245‑023‑09890‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09890-w [Google Scholar]
  70. Siegel, Alexandra A.
    2020 “Online Hate Speech.” InSocial Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, edited byNathaniel Persily, and Joshua A. Tucker, 56–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108890960.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960.005 [Google Scholar]
  71. Stangor, Charles
    2016 “The Study of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination within Social Psychology: A Quick History of Theory and Research.” InHandbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, edited byTodd Nelson, 3–27. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Stephan, Walter S., and Cookie White Stephan
    2013 “An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice.” InReducing Prejudice and Discrimination, edited byStuart Oskamp, 33–56. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Tindale, Christopher W.
    2007Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. 1st ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511806544
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806544 [Google Scholar]
  74. Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
    2001Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  75. Torres da Silva, Marisa
    2021Discurso de Ódio, Jornalismo e Participação das Audiências. Enquadramento, Regulação e Boas Práticas. Lisboa: Almedina ERC.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Ullmann, Stefanie, and Marcus Tomalin
    2020 “Quarantining Online Hate Speech: Technical and Ethical Perspectives.” Ethics and Information Technology22(1): 69–80. 10.1007/s10676‑019‑09516‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09516-z [Google Scholar]
  77. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1992 “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse & Society3(1): 87–118. 10.1177/0957926592003001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005 [Google Scholar]
  78. 1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  79. van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
    1987 “Fallacies in Pragma-dialectical Perspective.” Argumentation11: 283–301. 10.1007/BF00136779
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136779 [Google Scholar]
  80. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
    2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616389
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389 [Google Scholar]
  81. van Eemeren, Frans., and Bart Garssen
    2023 “The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited.” Argumentation1–14. 10.1007/s10503‑023‑09605‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09605-w [Google Scholar]
  82. Vargas, Francielle, Isabelle Carvalho, Fabiana Góes, Thiago Pardo, and Fabrício Benevenuto
    2022 “HateBR: A Large Expert Annotated Corpus of Brazilian Instagram Comments for Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection.” InProceedings of LREC 2022, 7174–7183. Marseille, France: ELRA. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.777
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Walton, Douglas N.
    1996 “Practical Reasoning and the Structure of Fear Appeal Arguments”. Philosophy & Rhetoric29(4): 301–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Waseem, Zeerak
    2016 “Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter.” InProceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, 138–142. Austin, Texas: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W16‑5618
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-5618 [Google Scholar]
  85. Weaver, Simon
    2011 “Jokes, Rhetoric and Embodied Racism: A Rhetorical Discourse Analysis of the Logics of Racist Jokes on the Internet.” Ethnicities11(4): 413–435. 10.1177/1468796811407755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811407755 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wiegand, Michael, Melanie Siegel, and Josef Ruppenhofer
    2018 “Overview of the GermEval 2018 Shared Task on the Identification of Offensive Language.” InProceedings of GermEval 2018 Workshop, 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2018), 1–10. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  88. Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl
    2015 “Discourse and Racism.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd Edition, edited byDeborah Tannen, Heidi Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 576–596. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Wodak, Ruth
    2020The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00085.car
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00085.car
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Afrophobia; counter-speech; covert hate speech; LGBTQphobia; overt hate speech; Romaphobia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error