Justifying the accusation

References

1. Benveniste, Émile
   1966 “La nature des pronoms.” Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Binns, Amy
   2012 “DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!: Managing Troublemakers in Magazines’ Online Communities.” Journalism Practice6 (4): 547–562. 10.1080/17512786.2011.648988
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.648988 [Google Scholar]
3. Bishop, Jonathan
   2012 “The Psychology of Trolling and Lurking: The Role of Defriending and Gamification for Increasing Participation in Online Communities Using Seductive Narratives.” InVirtual Community Participation and Motivation: Cross-Disciplinary Theories, ed. byHonglei Li, 160–176. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑4666‑0312‑7.ch010
   https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0312-7.ch010 [Google Scholar]
4. Bourcier, Danièle, and Oswald Ducrot
   1980 Les mots du discours. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coles, Bryn Alexander, and Melanie West
   2016 “Trolling the Trolls: Online Forum Users Constructions of the Nature and Properties of Trolling.” Computers in Human Behavior601: 233–244. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070 [Google Scholar]
6. Doury, Marianne
   2003 “L’évaluation des arguments dans les discours ordinaires: Le cas de l’accusation d’amalgame.” InLangage et société105 (3): 9–37. 10.3917/ls.105.0009
   https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.105.0009 [Google Scholar]
7. Doury, Marianne
   2008 “‘Ce n’est pas un argument !’ Sur quelques aspects des théorisations spontanées de l’argumentation.” InPratiques139–1401: 111–128. 10.4000/pratiques.1207
   https://doi.org/10.4000/pratiques.1207 [Google Scholar]
8. Dynel, Marta
   2016 “‘Trolling Is Not Stupid’: Internet Trolling as the Art of Deception Serving Entertainment.” Intercultural Pragmatics13 (3): 353–381. 10.1515/ip‑2016‑0015
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0015 [Google Scholar]
9. Eemeren, Frans Hendrik van, Bart Garssen, Erik. C. W. Krabbe, Arnolda Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean Hubert Martin Wagemans
   2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer Reference. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
10. Goffman, Erving
    [1973] 1996 Les relations en public. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hardaker, Claire
    2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research6 (2): 215–242. 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
12. Hardaker, Claire
    2013 “‘Uh… Not to Be Nitpicky,,,,,but…the Past Tense of Drag Is Dragged, Not Drug.’ An Overview of Trolling Strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict1 (1): 58–86. 10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har [Google Scholar]
13. Herring, Susan, Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab
    2002 “Searching for Safety Online: Managing ‘Trolling’ in a Feminist Forum.” The Information Society181: 371–384. 10.1080/01972240290108186
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108186 [Google Scholar]
14. Mazzarella, Diana
    2015 “Pragmatics and Epistemic Vigilance: The Employment of Sophisticated Interpretative Strategies.” Croatian Journal of PhilosophyXV (44): 183–199.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Müller, Misha-Laura
    2016 Plausible Deniability: From Gricean Pragmatics to the Insights of Relevance Theory. Master thesis. Neuchatel University.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Oswald, Steve
    2022 “Insinuation is Committing.” Journal of Pragmatics1981: 158–170. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.006 [Google Scholar]
17. Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak, and James J. Lee
    2008 “The Logic of Indirect Speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (3): 833–838. 10.1073/pnas.0707192105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707192105 [Google Scholar]
18. Plantin, Christian
    1996 L’argumentation. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Plantin, Christian
    2002 “Argumentation Studies and Discourse Analysis: The French Situation and Global Perspectives.” InDiscourse Studies4 (3): 343–368. 10.1177/14614456020040030501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040030501 [Google Scholar]
20. Preece, Jennifer
    2000 Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rheingold, Howard
    1993 The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Richardson, John
    2004 (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9 [Google Scholar]
23. de Saussure, Louis, and Steve Oswald
    2009 “Argumentation et engagement du locuteur : Pour un point de vue subjectiviste.” Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française291 : 215–243.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Spears, Russell, and Martin Lea
    1992 “Social Influence and the Influence of the ‘Social’ in Computer-Mediated Communication.” InContexts of Computermediated Communication, ed. byMartin Lea, 30–65. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    ([1986] 1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” InMind & Language25 (4): 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
27. Wason, Peter Cathcart
    1965 “The Contexts of Plausible Denial.” InJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior4 (1): 7–11. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(65)80060‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80060-3 [Google Scholar]
28. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    (eds.) 2001 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis: Introducing Qualitative Methods. London, Thousand Oaks [Calif.]: Sage. 10.4135/9780857028020
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]