The evidential dimension of implicitly conveyed disagreement in political debates

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, Lloyd B.
   1986 “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” InEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. byChafe Wallace, and Joanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chafe, Wallace
   1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chafe, Wallace, and Joanna Nichols
   (eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, Nj: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cornillie, Bert
   2009 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship between two Different Categories”. Functions of Language16(1): 44–62. 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor [Google Scholar]
6. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
   2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. UK: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑39391‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3 [Google Scholar]
7. Dayter, Daria
   2014 “Self-Praise in Micro-blogging.” Journal of Pragmatics611: 91–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021 [Google Scholar]
8. D’Errico, Francesca, Isabella Poggi, and Rocco Corriero
   2014 “Aggressive Language and Insults in Digital Political Participation.” International Conferences ICT 2014: 105–114.
   [Google Scholar]
9. de Haan, Ferdinand
   1999 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics18(1): 83–101.
   [Google Scholar]
10. de Saussure, Louis, and Steve Oswald
    2009 Argumentation et engagement du locuteur: pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française291: 215–243.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Evans, Ash
    2016 “Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags.” Language@Internet131. Available at : Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags – Language@Internet (languageatinternet.org).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nikole Patson
    2007 “The ‘Good Enough’ Approach to Language Comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass1(1–2): 71–83. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00007.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x [Google Scholar]
13. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1971 “Verbs of Judging. An Exercise in Semantic Description.” InStudies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. byCharles J. Fillmore, and Terence D. Langendoen, 272–289. New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Friedman, Viktor
    1986 “Evidentiality in the Balkans. Macedonian and Albanian.” InEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. byWallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 168–187. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Garassino, Davide, Viviana Masia, and Nicola Brocca
    2019 “Tweet as You Speak. The Role of Implicit Strategies and Pragmatic Functions in Political Communications: Data from a Diamesic Comparison.” Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata2–31: 187–208.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grice, Herbert P.
    1975 [1989] “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, Vol.91, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hintz, Daniel J., and Diane M. Hintz
    2017 “The Evidential Category of Mutual Knowledge in Quechua.” Lingua186–1871: 88–109. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.014 [Google Scholar]
18. Hodges, Adam
    2020 “Plausible Deniability”. InLanguage in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, ed. byJanet McIntosh, and Norma Mendoza-Denton, 137–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108887410.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887410.009 [Google Scholar]
19. Kamio, Akio
    1997 Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
20. Kiparsky, Carol, and Paul Kiparsky
    1971 “Fact.” InSemantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, ed. byDanny D. Steinberg, and Leon A. Jakobovitz, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Jayeon, and Xu, Weiai
    2018 “The more Attacks, the more Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review44(2): 201–213.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2009 La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2019 La lingua disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2021 “Manipulative Shallow Processing Induced by Presuppositions and Topics. Theoretical Perspectives and Experimental Evidence.” Frontiers in Communication, available at: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.610807
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.610807 [Google Scholar]
27. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo, and Viviana Masia
    2014 “Implicitness Impact: Measuring Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics611: 161–184. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.010 [Google Scholar]
28. Masia, Viviana
    2017 Sociobiological Bases of Information Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.9 [Google Scholar]
29. Masia, Viviana
    2020 “Presupposition, Assertion and the Encoding of Evidentiality in Political Discourse.” Linguistik Online102(2): 129–153. 10.13092/lo.102.6828
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.102.6828 [Google Scholar]
30. Masia, Viviana
    2021 The Manipulative Disguise of Truth. Tricks and Threats of Implicit communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.322
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.322 [Google Scholar]
31. Meibauer, Jörg
    2014 “A Truth that’s Told with Bad Intent: Lying and Implicit Content.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics28(1): 79–118. 10.1075/bjl.28.05mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.28.05mei [Google Scholar]
32. Nuyts, Jan
    2015 “Subjectivity Between Discourse and Conceptualization.” Journal of Pragmatics861: 106–110. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015 [Google Scholar]
33. Récanati, François
    1987 Meaning and Force. The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sbisà, Marina
    2007 Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
36. Stalnaker, Robert C.
    1973 “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic21: 447–457. 10.1007/BF00262951
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262951 [Google Scholar]
37. Stalnaker, Robert C.
    1974 “Pragmatic Presuppositions.” InSemantics and Philosophy, ed. byMunitz K. Milton, and Peter Unger, 471–482. New York: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Willett, Thomas
    1988 “A Cross-linguistic Survey of Grammaticalization of Evidentiality.” Studies in Language12(1): 57–91. 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
39. Yuan, Shupei, and Lu Hang
    2020 “It’s Global Warming, Stupid: Aggressive Communication Styles and Political Ideology in Science Blog Debates about Climate Change.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(4): 1003–1025. 10.1177/1077699020904791
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020904791 [Google Scholar]