1887
image of The virtue and shades of aggressive humour in press advertising
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Disparaging humour may take numerous forms and despite the emotional ambivalence it may occasionally cause, it may prove a valuable quality of an ad. While investigating one hundred multimodal press ads in English that simultaneously make use of metaphor and humour based on an incongruity-resolution mechanism, it was discovered that one-third thereof employed aggressive humour as well (Stwora 2023). Given the high incidence of the aggressive function in these ads, this paper explores this disparaging dimension in more detail to show that various shades of aggressiveness may be perceived as a virtue when used in advertising discourse. The paper advocates a need to consider further sub-categorisations of the aggressive function of humour when applied in advertising to reflect different hostility levels.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00102.stw
2024-04-16
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attardo, Salvatore
    1994Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2015 “Humorous Metaphors.” InCognitive Linguistics and Humor Research, edited byGeert Brône, Kurt Feyaerts, and Tony Veale, –. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110346343‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346343-005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, Salvatore, and Raskin, Victor
    1991 “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor: –. 10.1515/humr.1991.4.3‑4.293
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 [Google Scholar]
  4. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language online
    American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language online. https://ahdictionary.com
  5. Barsoux, Jean-Louis
    1993Funny Business: Humour Management and Business Culture. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beard, Fred K.
    2008 “Advertising and Audience Offense: The Role of Intentional Humor.” Journal of Marketing Communications (): –. 10.1080/13527260701467760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701467760 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beermann, Ursula, and Willibald Ruch
    2009a “How Virtuous is Humor? Evidence from Everyday Behavior.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research: –. 10.1515/HUMR.2009.023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.023 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009b “How Virtuous is Humor? What We Can Learn from Current Instruments.” Journal of Positive Psychology: –. 10.1080/17439760903262859
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903262859 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berger, Arthur Asa
    1993An Anatomy of Humor. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Besser, Avi, and Virgil Zeigler-Hill
    2011 “Pathological Forms of Narcissism and Perceived Stress during the Transition to the University: The Mediating Role of Humor.” International Journal of Stress Management (): –. 10.1037/a0024826
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024826 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blackford, Benjamin J., James Gentry, Robert L. Harrison, and Les Carlson
    2011 “The Prevalence and Influence of the Combination of Humor and Violence in Super Bowl Commercials.” Journal of Advertising (): –. 10.2753/JOA0091‑3367400408
    https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400408 [Google Scholar]
  12. Buijzen, Moniek, and Patti M. Valkenburg
    2004 “Developing a Typology of Humor in Audiovisual Media.” Media Psychology (): –. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chłopicki, Władysław
    1987 An Application of the Script Theory of Semantics to the Analysis of Selected Polish Humorous Short Stories. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2000 “Linguistic Analysis of Humour in Short Stories.” InŚwiat Humoruedited byStanisław Gajda, Dorota Brzozowska, –. Opole: Drukarnia Wydawnictwa Św. Krzyża w Opolu.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2006 “Humour and Cognition: Dynamics of Characters and Events.” InJęzyk a Komunikacja. At the Crossroads of Linguistic Sciences, edited byPiotr Chruszczewski, –. Kraków: Tertium.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cline, Thomas W., and James J. Kellaris
    1999 “The Joint Impact of Humor and Argument Strength in a Print Advertising Context: A Case for Weaker Arguments.” Psychology and Marketing (): –. 10.1002/(SICI)1520‑6793(199901)16:1<69::AID‑MAR5>3.0.CO;2‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199901)16:1<69::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, Christie
    1990Ethnic Humor around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DiCioccio, Rachel L.
    2012 “Humor as Aggressive Communication.” InHumor Communication: Theory, Impact, and Outcomes, edited byRachel L. DiCioccio, –. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dore, Margherita
    2020 “Intertextuality and Failed Taboo Humour in Advertising.” The European Journal of Humour Research (): –. 10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Dore
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Dore [Google Scholar]
  20. Dynel, Marta
    2013 “Humorous Phenomena in Dramatic Discourse.” The European Journal of Humour Research (): –. 10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisend, Martin
    2011 “How Humor in Advertising Works: A Meta-Analytic Test of Alternative Models.” Marketing Letters: –. 10.1007/s11002‑010‑9116‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-010-9116-z [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferguson, Mark A., and Thomas E. Ford
    2008 “Disparagement Humor: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Psychoanalytic, Superiority and Social Identity Theories.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research: –. 10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fry, William F.
    1963Sweet Madness: A Study of Humor. Palo Alto: Pacific. 10.1037/11790‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11790-000 [Google Scholar]
  24. Graham, Elizabeth E., Michael J. Papa, and Gordon P. Brooks
    1992 “Functions of Humor in Conversation: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Western Journal of Communication: –. 10.1080/10570319209374409
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374409 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray, John
    1992Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus: A Practical Guide for Improving Communication and Getting What You Want in Your Relationships. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gruner, Charles R.
    1997The Game of Humour: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gulas, Charles S., and Marc G. Weinberger
    2006Humor in Advertising. Armonk, NY, and London: M. E. Sharpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gulas, Charles S., Charles R. Taylor, and Marc G. Weinberger
    2021Humor in Advertising: Classic Perspectives and New Insights. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hilliard, Robert L.
    2014Writing for Television, Radio, and New Media. Stanford, CT: Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Horňák, Pavel
    2017 “Humour―The Strongest Emotional Appeal in Advertising.” InStrategic Innovative Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economicsedited byAndroniki Kavoura, Damianos P. Sakas, and Petros Tomaras, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑33865‑1_33
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33865-1_33 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hempelmann, Christian F.
    2017 “Key Terms in the Field of Humor.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humoredited bySalvatore Attardo, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-4 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hurley, Matthew M., Daniel C. Dennett, and Reginald B. Adams Jr.
    2011Inside Jokes. Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9027.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9027.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2017Filozofia Dowcipu. Humor jako Siła Napędowa Umysłu (Trans.Rafał Śmietana). Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Infante, Dominic A.
    1987 “Aggressiveness.” InPersonality and Interpersonal Communicationedited byJames C. McCroskey and John A. Daly, –. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Koszałkowska, Karolina, and Monika Wróbel
    2019 “Moral Judgment of Disparagement Humor.” Humor (): –. 10.1515/humor‑2018‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0023 [Google Scholar]
  36. Krikmann, Arvo
    2006 “Contemporary Linguistic Theories of Humour.” Folklore. Electronic Journal of Folklore: –. 10.7592/FEJF2006.33.kriku
    https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2006.33.kriku [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir
    2003 “Individual Differences in Use of Humor and Their Relation to Psychological Well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire.” Journal of Research in Personality (): –. 10.1016/S0092‑6566(02)00534‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. McGraw, Peter, and Joel Warner
    2015The Humour Code. A Global Search for What Makes Things Funny. New York etc.: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Meyer, John C.
    2000 “Humor as Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication.” Communication Theory: –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2000.tb00194.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Michalik, Urszula, and Iwona Sznicer
    2017 “The Use of Humor in the Multicultural Working Environment.” InMulticulturalism, Multilingualism and the Self: Studies in Linguistics and Language Learningedited byDanuta Gabryś-Barker, Dagmara Gałajda, Adam Wojtaszek, and Paweł Zakrajewski, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56892‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56892-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Morreall, John
    1983Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Peters, Natalie, Lucie Holmgreen, and Debra Oswald
    2015 “It’s Just a Joke: Reactions to and Justifications for Gender Role Stereotypes in Advertisements.” Journal of Psychological Research (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Plester, Barbara, Tim Bentley, and Emily Brewer
    2022 “‘It Only Hurts When I Laugh’: Tolerating Bullying Humour in Order to Belong at Work.” The European Journal of Humour Research (): –. 10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.2.645
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.2.645 [Google Scholar]
  44. Raskin, Victor
    1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosch, Eleanor
    1978 “Principles of Categorisation.” InCognition and Categorisation, edited byEleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ruch, Willibald, and Sonja Heintz
    2016 “The Virtue Gap in Humor: Exploring Benevolent and Corrective Humor.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science (): –. 10.1037/tps0000063
    https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000063 [Google Scholar]
  47. Santiago, Marina, and Sarah Seewoester Cain
    2017 “Audience Affiliation, Membership Categories, and the Construction of Humor in Stand-Up Comedy.” InHumorous Discourseedited byWładysław Chłopicki and Dorota Brzozowska, –. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501507106‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507106-008 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt-Hidding, Wolfgang
    1963 “Wit and Humor.” InHumor und Witz, edited byWolfgang Schmidt-Hidding, –. Munich: Hueber.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stwora, Anna
    2020a “The Thin Invisible Line – Between Funny and Distasteful Multimodal Advertising Discourse.” InExplorations in Humor Studies: Humor Research Project, edited byMarcin Kuczok, Anna Stwora, and Mariola Świerkot, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2020b “Funny or Distasteful? A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Surprise and Humour in Multimodal Advertising.” The European Journal of Humour Research (): –. 10.7592/EJHR2020.8.2.Stwora
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.2.Stwora [Google Scholar]
  51. 2020c “Sociopragmatic and Strategic Functions of Humour in Intercultural Business Contexts.” InExploring Business Language and Culture, edited byUrszula Michalik, Anna Stwora, Iwona Sznicer, and Paweł Zakrajewski, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑58551‑8_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58551-8_9 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2021 “On the Popcultural Life of Historical Works of Art in Humorous Advertising.” Świat i Słowo / World and Word (): –. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7911
    https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.7911 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2022 “The Intricacies of (Debatable) Humour in Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Standpoint.” Academic Journal of Modern Philology: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2023Synergistic Application of Metaphorical and Humorous Elements in Polish and English Advertising Discourse. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Stwora, Anna, and Grzegorz Zemełka
    2020 “Towards Enhancement, Distraction or Oblivion – Studying the Impact of Humorous Language in Advertising.” InExplorations in Humor Studies: Humor Research Project, edited byMarcin Kuczok, Anna Stwora, and Mariola Świerkot, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Śniecikowska, Beata
    2017 “Books with Pictures, Pictures with Sounds. On Some Phono-Visual Strategies in Avant-Garde and Post-Avant-Garde Literature for Children.” Paper presented atthe conference Culture • Cognition • Communication: (Inter)cultural Perspectives on Language and the Mind (ICPLM 2017), Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, September 14–15, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Tsakona, Villy
    2009 “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wiggins, Jerry S.
    1991 “Agency and Communion as Conceptual Coordinates for the Understanding and Measurement of Interpersonal Behavior.” InThinking Clearly about Psychology: Essays in Honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 1. Matters of Public Interest, Vol. 2. Personality and Psychopathology, edited byDante Cicchetti and William M. Grove, –. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wolff, H. A., C. E. Smith, and H. Murray
    1943 “The Psychology of Humor: A Study of the Responses to Race Disparagement Jokes.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology: –. 10.1037/h0075400
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075400 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yus, Francisco
    2003 “Humor and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00179‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2016Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00102.stw
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00102.stw
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error