1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Online reviews have partly become a complaints channel in which posters vent their negative feelings (Henning-Thurau et al. 2004), but the contents, as well as the way posters express their opinions, may vary depending on the type of review, the platform, and the consumers’ expectations, among others. This study explores 600 negative reviews in Spanish, posted to the outsourced review site Trustpilot about three different companies: Zara, Airbnb, and Travelgenio. The aim of this study is to examine: (1) the themes that posters raise as the source of complaint or conflict; and (2) the impoliteness formulae (Culpeper 2016) found in the three datasets. The results show that reviews are structured around a limited set of themes and formulae, which range from rather descriptive evaluations that report moderate dissatisfaction (Zara reviews) to highly aggressive reviews related to communication problems and significant loss of money and time (Travelgenio).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00104.her
2024-04-30
2026-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ascaniis, Silvia, Alessia Borrè, Elena Marchiori, and Lorenzo Cantoni
    2015 “‘Listen to your Customers!’ How Hotels Manage Online Travel Reviews. The Case of Hotels in Lugano”. InInformation and Communication Technologies in Tourism: Proceedings of the International Conference in Lugano, Switzerland, February 3–6, 2015, 59–72. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑14343‑9_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernal, Marta
    2007Categorización sociopragmática de la cortesía y de la descortesía. Un Estudio de la conversación coloquial española. Estocolmo: Universidad de Estocolmo.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube”. Journal of Pragmatics731: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bousfield, Derek
    2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bravo, Diana
    2005 “Categorías, tipologías y aplicaciones: hacia una redefinición de la cortesía comunicativa.” InEstudios de la (des)cortesía en español. categorías conceptuales y aplicaciones a córpora orales y escritos, ed. byDiana Bravo, 21–52. Buenos Aires: Dunken.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridges, Judith, and Camilla Vásquez
    2018 “If Nearly All Airbnb Reviews Are Positive, Does That Make Them Meaningless?”. Current Issues in Tourism21 (18): 2057–2075. 10.1080/13683500.2016.1267113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1267113 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cenni, Irene, and Patrick Goethals
    2017 “Negative Hotel Reviews on TripAdvisor: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis”. Discourse, Context & Media16 (2): 22–30. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cenni, Irene, and Camilla Vásquez
    2020 “Reflection: Airbnb’s Food-related ‘Online Experiences’: A Recipe for Connection and Escape”. Food and Foodways29 (1): 97–107. 10.1080/07409710.2020.1862547
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2020.1862547 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cenni, Irene, Patrick Goethal, and Camilla Vásquez
    2020 “A Cross-linguistic Study of Metacommunication in Online Hotel Reviews.” Intercultural Pragmatics17 (4): 445–470. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑4003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-4003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandrasapth, Koblarp, Natalia Yannopoulou, Klaus Schoefer, Tana Cristina Licsandru, and Thanos Papadopoulos
    2021 “Conflict in Online Consumption Communities: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research”. International Marketing Review38 (5): 900–926. 10.1108/IMR‑02‑2021‑0059
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2021-0059 [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25 (3): 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in The Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link”. Journal of Politeness Research1 (1): 35–72. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2016 “Impoliteness Strategies”. InInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. byAlessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 421–445. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dayter, Daria, and Sofia Rüdiger
    2014 “Speak your Mind, but Watch Your Mouth: Complaints in CouchSurfing References”. InFace Work and Social Media, ed. byKristina Bedijs, Gudrun Held, and Christiane Maab, 193–212. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Díaz-Muñoz, Patricia, and Carmen Maíz-Arévalo
    . Forthcoming, this issue. “‘We Are Completely Stunned’: Corrective Facework in Hosts’ Responses to Airbnb Reviews with Negative Valence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ert, Eyal, Aliza Fleischer, and Nathan Magen
    2016 “Trust and Reputation in the Sharing Economy: The Role of Personal Photos in Airbnb.” Tourism Management551: 62–73. 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng, Wei, and Wei Ren
    2020 “Impoliteness in Negative Online Consumer Reviews: A Cross-Language and Cross-Sector Comparison.” Intercultural Pragmatics17 (1): 1–25. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010a “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politeness”. International Review of Pragmatics21: 46–94. 10.1163/187731010X491747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X491747 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2010b “The Status Quo and Quo-Vadis of Impoliteness Research”. Intercultural Pragmatics7 (4): 535–559. 10.1515/iprg.2010.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.025 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity”. Journal of Pragmatics1341: 120–133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2021a “Impoliteness and Conflict in Spanish.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics, ed. byDale Koike and César Félix Brasdefer, 371–386. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2021b “Getting into The Mob: A Netnographic, Case-Study Approach to Online Public Shaming.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: Between Convergence and Controversy, ed. byMarjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen and Jan Chovanec, 247–274. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84602‑2_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84602-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language and Communication841: 61–75. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou
    2019 “Im/politeness and Discursive Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics1451: 91–101. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  25. García, Carmen
    2009 “Intralingual Pragmatic Variation in the Performance of Reprimanding.” Intercultural Pragmatics6 (4): 443–472. 10.1515/IPRG.2009.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.024 [Google Scholar]
  26. Giles, Howard, and Peter Powesland
    1997 “Accommodation Theory”. InSociolinguistics: Modern Linguistics Series, ed. byNicholas Coupland, and Adam Jaworski, 232–239, London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25582‑5_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_19 [Google Scholar]
  27. He, Sherry, Brett Hollenbeck, and Davide Proserpio
    2022 “The Market of Fake Reviews.” Marketing Science41 (5): 896–921. 10.1287/mksc.2022.1353
    https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1353 [Google Scholar]
  28. Henning-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin P. Gwinner, Gianfranco Walsh, and Dwayne D. Gremler
    2004 “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?”. Journal of Interactive Marketing18 (1): 38–52. 10.1002/dir.10073
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hernández-López, María de la O.
    2019 “What Makes a Positive Experience? Offline/Online Communication and Rapport Enhancement in Airbnb Positive Reviews.” Pragmatics and Society10 (2): 177–204. 10.1075/ps.16060.ohe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16060.ohe [Google Scholar]
  30. 2022 “When Travellers’ Expectations Are Not Met: Dispraise in Airbnb Online Consumer Reviews.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict10 (2): 241–268. 10.1075/jlac.00041.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00041.her [Google Scholar]
  31. 2024Changing Discursive Trends in the Online Review Genre: A Cross-Linguistic Study of BlablaCar. The Netherlands: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hidalgo Downing, Raquel
    2022 “Quejas, elogios y cumplidos online: las reseñas en TripAdvisor”. Signos. Estudios de Lingüística55 (109): 532–559.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ho, Victor
    2017 “Giving Offense and Making Amends: How Hotel Management Attempts to Manage Rapport with Dissatisfied Customers”. Journal of Pragmatics1091: 1–11. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kaul de Marlangeon, Silvia, and Laura Alba-Juez
    2012 “A Typology of Verbal Impoliteness Behavior for the English and Spanish Cultures.” RESLA251: 69–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1997 “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language4 (2): 251–287. 10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiliç, Ali, and Çiğdem Karatepe
    2021 “Electronic Complaints: An Empirical Study of Negative Reviews from Amazon.com Posters”. Advances in Language and Literary Studies12 (5): 42–47. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.5.p.42
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.5.p.42 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, Kwang-Ho, and Dong Hee Kim
    2019 “A Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Platform Business Model: The Case of Airbnb.” Service Business131: 647–669. 10.1007/s11628‑019‑00399‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-019-00399-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Litvin, Stephen W., Ronald E. Goldsmith, and Bing Pan
    2008 “Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Hospitality and Tourism Management.” Tourism Management29 (3): 458–468. 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “Online Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video”. Journal of Pragmatics43 (10): 2578–2593. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
    2013El Discurso Político en Twitter: Análisis de Mensajes que Trinan. Barcelona: Anthropos.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Moyna, María Irene, and José Luis Blas Arroyo
    2021 “Pragmatic Variation and Forms of Address”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics, ed. byDale Koike, and César Félix Brasdefer, 289–304. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nelson, Phillip
    1970 “Information and Consumer Behavior”. Journal of Political Economy78 (2): 311–329. 10.1086/259630
    https://doi.org/10.1086/259630 [Google Scholar]
  43. Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
    2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics1321: 91–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Patton, Michael
    2014Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rizer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson
    2010 “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’.” Journal of Consumer Culture10 (1): 13–36. 10.1177/1469540509354673
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rose, Susan, Neil Hair, and Moira Clark
    2011 “Online Customer Experience: A Review of the Business-to-Consumer Online Purchase Context.” International Journal of Management Reviews131: 24–39. 10.1111/j.1468‑2370.2010.00280.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00280.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Sifianou, Maria
    2012 “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1554–1564. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research1 (2): 237–262. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vásquez, Camilla
    2011 “Complaints Online: The Case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (6): 1707–1717. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2014The Discourse of Online Consumer Reviews. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vivas Márquez, Julia, and Susana Ridao Rodrigo
    2015 “‘Lo siento pero me parecen horribles!!!’: Análisis pragmalingüístico de la descortesía en la red social Facebook.” Revista de Filología331: 217–236.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00104.her
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00104.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anger; conflict; impoliteness; online consumer reviews; Spanish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error