Conventionalized impoliteness formulae in third-party assessments

References

1. Ahmed, Sara
   2004 The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
   1991 Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
   2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
4. Andermahr, Sonya, Terry Lovell, and Carol Wolkowitz
   2000 A Glossary of Feminist Theory. London: Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anderson, Benedict
   1991 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Antonsich, Marco
   2020 “Everyday Nation in Times of Rising Nationalism.” Sociology(): –. 10.1177/0038038520930178
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520930178 [Google Scholar]
7. Appadurai, Arjun
   2013 The Future as Cultural Fact. London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Balantani, Angeliki
   2015 “Η Επικοινωνιακή Λειτουργία του Εντάξει [The Communicative Function of Entaksi].” InΕλληνική Γλώσσα και Προφορική Επικοινωνία [The Greek Language and Spoken Interaction], ed. byTheodossia-Soula Pavlidou, –. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Besnier, Niko
   1990 “Language and Affect.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223 [Google Scholar]
10. Bien, Peter
    2005 “Inventing Greece.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies(): –. 10.1353/mgs.2005.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2005.0015 [Google Scholar]
11. Billig, Michael
    1995 Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bozatzis, Nikos
    1999 “Greek National Identity in Talk: The Rhetorical Articulation of an Ideological Dilemma.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Lancaster, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bousfield, Derek
    2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
14. Bucholtz, Mary
    1999 “You da Man: Narrating the Racial Other in the Linguistic Production of White Masculinity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics(): –. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00090 [Google Scholar]
15. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
16. Christie, Christine
    2013 “The Relevance of Taboo Language: An Analysis of the Indexical Values of Swearwords.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Christopoulou, Katerina
    2016 “Mια Λεξικολογική Προσέγγιση στο Περιθωριακό Λεξιλόγιο της Νέας Ελληνικής [A Lexicological Approach to Slang Vocabulary in Modern Greek].” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Patras.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Closs, Stephens A.
    2016 “The Affective Atmospheres of Nationalism.” Cultural Geographies(): –. 10.1177/1474474015569994
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474015569994 [Google Scholar]
19. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2009 “A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” InTalk in Interaction: Comparative Perspectives, ed. byMarkku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, –. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
    2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
22. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research(): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
23. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
24. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
25. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Claire Hardaker
    2017 “Impoliteness.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_9 [Google Scholar]
26. Deignan, Alice
    2010 “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” InResearching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, ed. byGraham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.26.21dei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.21dei [Google Scholar]
27. Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek (Λεξικό της Κοινής Νεοελληνικής) 1998 Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
29. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing Methodologically. The Impoliteness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English Studies: –. 10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
30. Dynel, Marta
    2015 “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research(): –. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0013 [Google Scholar]
31. Fox, Jon E., and Cynthia Miller-Idriss
    2008 “Everyday Nationhood.” Ethnicities: –. 10.1177/1468796808088925
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796808088925 [Google Scholar]
32. Gal, Susan, and Judith T. Irvine
    1995 “The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference.” Social Research(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The Culture Wars.” Journal of Politeness Research: –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou
    2017 “Im/politeness and Identity.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_10 [Google Scholar]
35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
    2013 “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research(): –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
36. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2021 “Morality in Socio-pragmatics.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. byMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.021 [Google Scholar]
37. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” InRethinking Context, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    2000 “Emotion within Situated Activity.” InLinguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, –. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gourgouris, Stathis
    1996 Dream Nation: Enlightenment, Colonization and the Institution of Modern Greece. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Günthner, Susanne
    2011 “The Construction of Emotional Involvement in Everyday German Narratives — Interactive Uses of ‘Dense Constructions’.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hamilakis, Yannis
    2007 The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
44. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomedology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hobsbawm, Eric J.
    1991 Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Holt, Elizabeth
    2000 “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04 [Google Scholar]
47. Jay, Timothy, and Kristin Janschewitz
    2008 “The Pragmatics of Swearing.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/JPLR.2008.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.013 [Google Scholar]
48. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
49. Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression — A Position Paper.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict(): –. 10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
50. Karachaliou, Rania
    2018 Η Προσφώνηση στις Συνομιλιακές Αφηγήσεις [Addressing in Conversational Narratives]. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Karachaliou, Rania
    2020 “Το Πραγματολογικό Μόριο α στην Πρόσληψη των Αφηγήσεων [The Pragmatic Particle ah in the Reception of Greek Narratives].” InΠραγματολογικά Μόρια στην Ελληνική και Άλλες Γλώσσες [Pragmatic Particles in Greek and Other Languages], ed. byTheodossia-Soula Pavlidou, –. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
    1989 More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
53. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2015 Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
55. Mateo, José, and Francisco Yus
    2013 “Towards a Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Taxonomy of Insults.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict(): –. 10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat [Google Scholar]
56. Musolff, Andreas
    2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict(): –. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
57. Nolan, Mary
    1997 “Against Exceptionalisms [Review of American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, by Seymour Martin Lipset].” The American Historical Review(): –. 10.2307/2171511
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2171511 [Google Scholar]
58. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 “Indexing Gender.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ochs, Elinor
    1996 “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi Schieffelin
    1989 “Language Has a Heart.” Text(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
    2016 Καταγράφοντας την Ελληνική Γλώσσα [Making a Record of the Greek Language]. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2006 “Facial Expression in an Assessment.” InVideo Analysis: Methodology and Methods, ed. byHubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, and Hans-Georg Soeffner, –. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    (eds.) 2012 Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
64. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses
    1999 “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” InMetonymy in Language and Thought, ed. byKlaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
66. Rampton, Ben
    1995 Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Reber, Εlisabeth
    2012 Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.215
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.215 [Google Scholar]
68. Sacks, Harvey
    1972a “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. byDavid Sudnow, –. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sacks, Harvey
    1972b “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, –. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. byRichard Baumann, and Joel Sherzer, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Santa Ana, Otto
    1999 ‘“Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-Immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926599010002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004 [Google Scholar]
72. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” InStudies in Anaphora, ed. byBarbara A. Fox, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch [Google Scholar]
73. Selting, Margret
    1996 “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-Called ‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” InProsody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008 [Google Scholar]
74. Sifianou, Maria
    2019 “Im/Politeness and In/Civility: A Neglected Relationship?” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008 [Google Scholar]
75. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Introduction.” InEmotion in Interaction, ed. byAnssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
76. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
77. Terkourafi, Marina
    2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
78. Terkourafi, Marina
    2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics(): –. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
79. Thompson, Andrew
    2001 “Nations, National Identities and Human Agency: Putting People Back into Nations.” The Sociological Review(): –. 10.1111/1467‑954X.00242
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00242 [Google Scholar]
80. Todorova, Maria
    [1997] 2009 Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Tzanelli, Rodanthi
    2008 “The Nation has Two Voices: Diforia and Performativity in Athens 2004.” Cultural Studies(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
82. van Dijk, Teun
    2006 “Politics, Ideology and Discourse.” InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume on Politics and Language, ed. byRuth Wodak, –. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00722‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7 [Google Scholar]
83. Wetherell, Margaret
    2012 Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446250945
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945 [Google Scholar]
84. Whitehead, Kevin A.
    2012 “Racial Categories as Resources and Constraints in Everyday Interactions: Implications for Racialism and Non-Racialism in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Ethnic and Racial Studies(): –. 10.1080/01419870.2011.591407
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.591407 [Google Scholar]
85. Whitehead, Kevin A., and Gene H. Lerner
    2009 “When are Persons ‘White’? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racial Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926509106413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509106413 [Google Scholar]
86. Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger
    2006 “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly(): –. 10.1177/019027250606900203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900203 [Google Scholar]