1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Semantic conflict in online discussions
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents a study on the negotiation of word meaning in the context of semantic conflict. Focusing on online discussions about whether it is acceptable to deceive children about the existence of Santa Claus, we analyse the linguistic dynamics observed in an online Swedish discussion forum. We explore how participants negotiate the meaning and appropriateness of the word (‘lying’). Our findings reveal that positioning oneself in relation to the contested word is central to the negotiation process, as participants use meta-linguistic objections and comments for negotiating word meanings, employing strategies of contrasting, explicating, and implying. Key constructions used include “x-and-x” to disqualify associated meanings, and “x-is-x” to assert inherent meanings. This research provides insights into the mechanics of semantic negotiation, demonstrating how participants manage disagreement and conflict through language in online interactions. We also show how word meaning negotiations can be used to map out the meaning potential of the negotiated word, in this case ‘lying’.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
2025-05-15
2025-06-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr/jlac.00133.myr.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allwood, Jens
    2000 “An Activity-Based Approach to Pragmatics.” InAbduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics, edited byHarry Bunt and William Black, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/nlp.1.02all
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.1.02all [Google Scholar]
  2. Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli
    2016 “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 [Google Scholar]
  3. Babcock, Meghan. J., Vivien P. Ta, and William Ickes
    2014 “Latent Semantic Similarity and Language Style Matching in Initial Dyadic Interactions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology: –. 10.1177/0261927X13499331
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13499331 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986 “The Problem of Speech Genres.” InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, edited byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, –. Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/720466‑005
     https://doi.org/10.7560/720466-005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bilmes, Jack
    2011 “Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk”. Human Studies: –. 10.1007/s10746‑011‑9183‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan, and Verschueren, Jef
    1992 “The Role of Language in European Nationalist Ideologies.” Pragmatics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou [Google Scholar]
  8. boyd, danah M., and Ellison, Nicole B.
    2007 “Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication: –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Bunt, Harry, Jan Alexandersson, Jean Carletta, Jae-Woong Choe, Alex Chengyu Fang,
    2010 “Towards an ISO Standard for Dialogue Act Annotation.” InProceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), May 2010, La Valette, Malta. https://hal.science/inria-00544997
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Croft, William, and Alan D. Cruse
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruse, Alan D.
    1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2005 “Conversational Interpretation of Lexical Items and Conversational Contrasting.” InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. byAuli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.17.15dep
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.15dep [Google Scholar]
  14. 2011 “The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies: –. 10.1007/s10746‑011‑9187‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9187-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Derks, Daantje, Ard A. Bos, and Jasper von Grumbkow
    2008 “Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Motives and Social Context.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior (): –. 10.1089/cpb.2007.9926
     https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9926 [Google Scholar]
  16. Drew, Paul
    1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  17. Egbert, Maria
    1997 “Some Interactional Achievements of Other-initiated Repair in Multiperson Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00039‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00039-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 “Other-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization: Some Conversational Events that Trigger Linguistic and Regional Membership Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Erle, Tobias M., Katharina Schmid, Simon H. Goslar, and Julia D. Martin
    2021 “Emojis as Social Information in Digital Communication.” Emotion. Advance online publication. 10.1037/emo0000992
     https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000992 [Google Scholar]
  20. Eshghi, Arash, Christine Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough, and Matthew Purver
    2015 “Feedback in Conversation as Incremental Semantic Update.” InProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2015), –. Queen Mary University of London, UK, April 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language: –. 10.2307/414531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia, Angela C., and Jennifer B. Jacobs
    1999 “The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction: –. 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibson, Will
    2009 “Intercultural Communication Online: Conversation Analysis and the Investigation of Asynchronous Written Discourse.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed
    2017 “Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of Digital CA.” Journal of Pragmatics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Glikson, Ella, Alon Cheshin, and Gerben A. van Kleef
    2018 “The Dark Side of a Smiley: Effects of Smiling Emoticons on Virtual First Impressions.” Social Psychological & Personality Science (): –. 10.1177/1948550617720269
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720269 [Google Scholar]
  27. Herring, Susan
    2004 “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behaviour.” InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, edited bySasha Barab, Rob Kling and James H. Gray, –. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kádár, Dániel, Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression: A Position Paper.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaye, Linda K., Helen J. Wall, and Stephanie A. Malone
    2016 “‘Turn That Frown Upside-Down’: A Contextual Account of Emoticon Usage on Different Virtual Platforms.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.088
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.088 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kelly, Lynne, and Aimee E. Miller-Ott
    2018 “Perceived Miscommunication in Friends’ and Romantic Partners’ Texted Conversations.” Southern Communication Journal (): –. 10.1080/1041794X.2018.1488271
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1488271 [Google Scholar]
  31. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lo, Shao-Kang
    2008 “The Nonverbal Communication Functions of Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior (): –. 10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
     https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ludlow, Peter
    2014 Living Words: Meaning Underdetermination and the Dynamic Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lyons, John
    1995 Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810213 [Google Scholar]
  35. Marco, Albeda M.
    2023 “Rhetorical Questions as Reproaching Devices.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.00077.alb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00077.alb [Google Scholar]
  36. Marcoccia, Michel
    2004 “On-Line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00038‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
  37. Marwick, Alice. E., and Lewis, Rebecca
    2017 “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.” Data & Society. Available athttps://datasociety.net/library/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/ (accessed30th November 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Meredith, Joanne
    2019 “Conversation Analysis and Online Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040 [Google Scholar]
  39. Meredith, Joanne, and Elizabeth Stokoe
    2014 “Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘Chat’ with Spoken Interaction.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481313510815
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815 [Google Scholar]
  40. Moulinou, Iphigenia
    2014 “Striving to Make the Difference: Linguistic Devices of Moral Indignation.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.2.1.03mou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.1.03mou [Google Scholar]
  41. Myrendal, Jenny
    2015 Word Meaning Negotiation in Online Discussion Forum Communication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/40807
  42. 2019 “Negotiating Meanings Online: Disagreements About Word Meaning in Discussion Forum Communication.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445619829234
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619829234 [Google Scholar]
  43. Norén, Kerstin, and Per Linell
    2007 “Meaning Potentials and the Interaction between Lexis and Contexts: An Empirical Substantiation.” Pragmatics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Obermaier, Magdalena, and Desirée Schmuck
    2022 “Youths as Targets: Factors of Online Hate Speech Victimization among Adolescents and Young Adults.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (). 10.1093/jcmc/zmac012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac012 [Google Scholar]
  45. Paulus, Trena, Warren, Amber, and Jessica N. Lester
    2016 “Applying Conversation Analysis Methods to Online Talk: A Literature Review”. Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Petraki, Eleni
    2005 “Disagreement and Opposition in Multigenerational Interviews with Greek-Australian Mothers and Daughters.” Text (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Rommetveit, Ragnar
    1992 “Outlines of a Dialogically Based Social-Cognitive Approach to Human Cognition and Communication.” InThe Dialogical Alternative: Towards a Theory of Language and Mind, ed. byAstri Heen Wold, –. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Schober, Michael F.
    2005 “Conceptual Alignment in Conversation.” InOther Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide between Self and Others, edited byBertram F. Malle and Sara D. Hodges, –. New York: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. (Vol.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language (): –. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  52. Schönfeldt, Juliane, and Andrea Golato
    2003 “Repair in Chats: A Conversation Analytic Approach.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02 [Google Scholar]
  53. Soler, Aina G., Matthieu Labeau, and Chloé Clavel
    2023 “Measuring Lexico-Semantic Alignment in Debates with Contextualized Word Representations.” InProceedings of the First Workshop on Social Influence in Conversations (SICon 2023), –. 10.18653/v1/2023.sicon‑1.6
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sicon-1.6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Srivastava, Sumit, Mariët Theune, and Alejandro Catala
    2023 “The Role of Lexical Alignment in Human Understanding of Explanations by Conversational Agents.” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’23), –. 10.1145/3581641.3584086
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584086 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ta, Vivien P., Meghan J. Babcock, and William Ickes
    2017 “Developing Latent Semantic Similarity in Initial, Unstructured Interactions: The Words May Be All you Need”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X16638386
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16638386 [Google Scholar]
  56. Terkourafi, Marina
    2011 “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/Politeness across Time and Space.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2011.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tracy, Karen
    2008 “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/JPLR.2008.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.009 [Google Scholar]
  58. Walther, Joseph B., and Kyle P. D’Addario
    2001 “The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Social Science Computer Review (): –. 10.1177/089443930101900307
     https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
Loading
Semantic conflict in online discussions
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00133.myr
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: online interaction ; word meaning negotiation ; disagreement ; conflict

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error