1887
image of Between hegemonic fiction and islamophobic fringe

Abstract

Abstract

While many studies have recently addressed and deconstructed rightwing online language aggression and strategies of Othering, it is seldom considered how such bellicose messages are rendered culturally plausible and, as such, “recognizable” to mainstream publics. This article addresses the issue by comparing how the Norwegian extreme-right media outlet the (HRS) discursively constructs Muslim and so-called non-Western immigrant identities in relation to Self/Other distinctions frequently encountered in Hollywood war cinema. Identifying three shared framing patterns — (a) differential allocation of (de)humanizing characteristics, (b) regulation of facial recognition, and (c) restricted perspective-taking — it argues that a structurally similar framework for Manichean conflict perception extends from popular war culture into public political discourse. Attention is directed to how the HRS’s representations play into, and draw tacit plausibility from, broader interpretive frames and how political rhetoric about incomprehensible, evil “Others” may assert their discursive effects by resonating with hegemonic backgrounds of meaning.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00144.and
2026-01-12
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlac.00144.and/jlac.00144.and.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00144.and&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alsultany, Evelyn
    2012Arabs and Muslims in the Media: Race and Representation after 9/11. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreasen, Søren Mosgaard
    2020 “Moral Economies of Exclusion: Politics of Fear through Antagonistic Anonymity.” Global Discourse (): –. 10.1332/204378919X15755364498325
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378919X15755364498325 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2024 “The Shadow Drama: Metaphor, Affect, and Discursive Polarization in Norwegian Extreme-right Representations.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. Advance online publication. 10.1075/jlac.00117.and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00117.and [Google Scholar]
  4. Bangstad, Sindre
    2015 “The Racism that Dares not Speak its Name: Rethinking Neo-nationalism and Neo-racism in Norway.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics (): –. 10.17356/ieejsp.v1i1.26
    https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i1.26 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bangstad, Sindre, and Frode Helland
    2019 “The Rhetoric of Islamophobia: An Analysis of the Means of Persuasion in Hege Storhaug’s Writings on Islam and Muslims.” Ethnic and Racial Studies (): –. 10.1080/01419870.2019.1615630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1615630 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barthes, Roland
    1964 “Rhétorique de l’image.” Communications (): –. 10.3406/comm.1964.1027
    https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1964.1027 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bekkengen, Fam Vivian
    2025 “Norwegian Media Barometer 2024 (Statistical Analyses 179).” Statistics Norway, April8. https://www.ssb.no/en/kultur-og-fritid/tids-og-mediebruk/artikler/norwegian-media-barometer-2024
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry, Jeffrey M., and Sarah Sobieraj
    2014The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke
    2006 “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology (): –. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  10. Brons, Lajos L.
    2015 “Othering, An Analysis.” Transcience: A Journal of Global Studies (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brække, Jonas, Mari Brenna Vollan, and Anniken C. Mohr
    2020 “Anmelder for rasisme [Pressing Racism Charges].” Klassekampen, February5. https://arkiv.klassekampen.no/article/20200205/ARTICLE/200209985
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler, Judith
    2004Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2009Frames of War. When is Life Grievable?London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clover, Julian
    2025 “80% of Norwegian Households Subscribing to Streaming Service.” Broadband TV News, May16. https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2025/05/16/80-of-norwegian-households-subscribing-to-streaming-service/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Døving, Cora Alexa
    2020 “Muslims are… Contextualizing Survey Answers.” InThe Shifting Boundaries of Prejudice. Antisemitism and Islamophobia in Contemporary Norway, ed. byChristhard Hoffmann and Vibeke Moe, –. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. 10.18261/978‑82‑15‑03468‑3‑2019‑09
    https://doi.org/10.18261/978-82-15-03468-3-2019-09 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekman, Mattias
    2015 “Online Islamophobia and the Politics of Fear: Manufacturing the Green Scare.” Ethnic and Racial Studies (): –. 10.1080/01419870.2015.1021264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1021264 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellingsen, Trond
    2020 “‘Kakerlakk- og steppebavian-saken’: Høyesterett har avsagt sin dom [The Cockroach and Baboon Case: The Supreme Court Has Handed Down its Judgement].” HRS, February7. https://www.rights.no/2020/01/kakerlakk-og-steppebavian-saken-hoyesterett-har-avsagt-sin-dom/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Farkas, Johan, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer
    2018 “Cloaked Facebook Pages: Exploring Fake Islamist Propaganda in Social Media.” New Media & Society (): –. 10.1177/1461444817707759
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707759 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaustad, Terje
    2019 “How Streaming Services Make Cinema More Important.” Nordic Journal of Media Studies (): –. 10.2478/njms‑2019‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2019-0005 [Google Scholar]
  20. George, Cherian
    2017Hate Spin: The Manufacture of Religious Offense and its Threat to Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gerbner, George
    1998 “Cultivation Analysis: An Overview.” Mass Communication and Society: –. 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gullestad, Marianne
    2006Plausible Prejudice: Everyday Experiences and Social Images of Nation, Culture and Race. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall, Stuart
    1980 “Encoding/Decoding.” InCulture, Media, Language, ed. byStuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1996 “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power.” InModernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies, ed. byStuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert, and Kenneth Thompson, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hervik, Peter
    2011The Annoying Difference: The Emergence of Danish Neo-nationalism, Immigration, and Islamophobia in the Post-1989 World. New York: Berghahn Books. 10.3167/9780857451002
    https://doi.org/10.3167/9780857451002 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2019 “Denmark’s Blond Vision and the Fractal Logics of a Nation in Danger.” Identities (): –. 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1587905
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2019.1587905 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2022 “Critical Understanding of Racialisation in the Era of Global Populism.” Nordic Journal of Social Research (): –. 10.18261/njsr.13.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.18261/njsr.13.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Human Rights Service (HRS)
    Human Rights Service (HRS) 2019 “Om HRS [About HRS].” HRS. https://www.rights.no/om-hrs/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Human Rights Watch (HRW)
    Human Rights Watch (HRW) 2019 “About us.” Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jørgensen, Marianne Winther, and Louise Phillips
    2002Diskursanalyse som teori og metode [Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method]. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Karlsen, Rita
    2018 “Ny bok: Eksperimentet som slo feil [New Book: The Experiment that Failed].” HRS, November12. https://www.rights.no/2018/11/ny-bok-eksperimentet-som-slo-feil/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lean, Nathan
    2017The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Hatred of Muslims. 2nd edn.London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Levinas, Emmanuel
    2002 “Ethics and the Face.” InThe Phenomenology Reader, ed. byDermot Moran and Tim Mooney, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Machin, David, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2005 “Computer Games as Political Discourse. The Case of ‘Black Hawk Down.’” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.4.1.06mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.06mac [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller-Idriss, Cynthia
    2020Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mouffe, Chantal
    2000The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Neumann, Iver B., and Daniel H. Nexon
    2006 “Introduction: Harry Potter and the Study of World Politics.” InHarry Potter and International Relations, ed. byDaniel H. Nexon and Ivor B. Neumann, –. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. O’Shea, Noel
    2016 “‘Something Genuinely Norwegian’: Cultural Identity Under the Influence of American Cinema in the Found Footage Aesthetic of Trolljegeren/Trollhunter (2010).” Studies in European Cinema (): –. 10.1080/17411548.2016.1258883
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2016.1258883 [Google Scholar]
  40. Payne, Matthew
    2016Playing War: Military Video Games After 9/11. New York: New York University Press. 10.18574/nyu/9781479895106.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479895106.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pötzsch, Holger
    2011 “Borders, Barriers, and Grievable Lives: The Discursive Production of Self and Other in Film and Other Audio-visual Media.” Nordicom Review (): –. 10.1515/nor‑2017‑0114
    https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0114 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2012 “Between Constitutive Absence and Subversive Presence: Self and Other in the Contemporary War Film.” Ph.D. diss., Tromsø University.
  43. 2013 “Ubiquitous Absence.” Nordicom Review (): –. 10.2478/nor‑2013‑0047
    https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0047 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2018 “Of Monsters and Men: Forms of Evil in War films.” InThe Enemy in Contemporary Film, ed. byMartin Löschnigg and Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110591217‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110591217-004 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2024 “Guilt and Grievability at War: Military Accountability and the Other in Mark of Cain and Battle for Haditha.” Journal of War & Culture Studies (): –. 10.1080/17526272.2023.2296705
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2023.2296705 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pötzsch, Holger, and Emil Lundedal Hammar
    2019 “Playing Perpetrators: Interrogating Evil in Videogames about Violent Conflicts.” InThe Routledge International Handbook of Perpetrator Studies, ed. bySusanne C. Knittel and Zachary J. Goldberg, . London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315102887‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102887-30 [Google Scholar]
  47. Said, Edward W.
    1978Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty
    1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” InMarxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited byCary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, –. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stahl, Roger
    2010Militainment, Inc.: War, Media, and Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Storhaug, Hege
    2018 “Et grotesk signal fra de gjengkriminelle: Skutt og drept på åpen gate [A Grotesque Signal from the Gangs: Shot and Killed in the Street].” HRS, November20. https://www.rights.no/2018/11/et-grotesk-signal-fra-de-gjengkriminelle-skutt-og-drept-pa-apen-gate/
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2020 “Får ikke jobb med hijab på hodet. Overrasket? [Can’t Get a Job with a Hijab on. Surprised?].” HRS, March9. https://www.rights.no/2020/03/far-ikke-jobb-med-hijab-pa-hodet-overrasket/
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Storyboard
    Storyboard 2025 “Top Sites 01.09. 2018 — 01.06. 2020.” Storyboard. https://storyboard.news/v2/client/advanced?domain=www.rights.no&start=2018-09-01&end=2020-06-01
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2005Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Weldes, Jutta
    2003 “Popular Culture, Science Fiction, and World Politics: Exploring Intertextual Relations.” InTo Seek Out New Worlds: Exploring Links Between Science Fiction and World Politics, ed. byJutta Weldes, –. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781403982087_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982087_1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 “Staging Politics in Television: Fiction and/or Reality?” InEinigkeitsdiskurse, ed. byStephan Habscheid and Clements Knobloch, –. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00144.and
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00144.and
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: immigration ; Islamophobia ; the human rights service ; war cinema ; discourse analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error