Discourses of discrimination

References

1. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon L. Millar
   2017 Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72604‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 [Google Scholar]
2. Billig, Michael
   1995 Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
   2014a “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics731: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
   2014b “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2(2): 59–81. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou [Google Scholar]
5. Bouattia, Malia
   2019 “Between Submission and Threat: The British State’s Contradictory Relationship with Muslim Women.” InIt’s Not About the Burqa, edited byMariam Khan. London: Picador.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bousfield, Derek
   2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics39(12): 2185–2216. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
7. Bracke, Sarah
   2012 “From ‘Saving Women’ to ‘Saving Gays’: Rescue Narratives and their Dis/Continuities.” European Journal of Women’s Studies9(2): 237–252. 10.1177/1350506811435032
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506811435032 [Google Scholar]
8. Braidotti, Rosi
   2002 Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Braidotti, Rosi
   2019 Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
11. Chen, Gina Masullo
    2016 Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Closs Stephens, Angharad
    2016 “The Affective Atmospheres of Nationalism.” Cultural Geographies23(2): 181–198. 10.1177/1474474015569994
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474015569994 [Google Scholar]
13. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
    2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
15. Demata, Massimiliano, and Natalia Knoblock
    2021 “Editorial.” Journal of Language and Discrimination5(1): 1–4. 10.1558/jld.19996
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.19996 [Google Scholar]
16. Dobs, Abby M., and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2013 “Impoliteness in Polylogal Interaction: Accounting for Face-Threat Witnesses’ Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics531: 112–130. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
17. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
18. Eckert, Penelope
    2016 “Third Wave Variationism.” InOxford Handbook Topics in Linguistics. Online edn.Oxford Academic, 5 Dec. 2014), 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.27accessed12 Nov. 2025.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.27 [Google Scholar]
19. Esposito, Eleonora
    2021 “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict9(1): 1–20. 10.1075/jlac.00051.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00051.int [Google Scholar]
20. Fairclough, Norman
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Farris, Sara R.
    2012 “Femonationalism and the ‘Regular’ Army of Labour Called Migrant Women.” History of the Present2(2): 184–199. 10.5406/historypresent.2.2.0184
    https://doi.org/10.5406/historypresent.2.2.0184 [Google Scholar]
22. Farris, Sara R.
    2017 In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822372929
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372929 [Google Scholar]
23. Georgalidou, Marianthi
    2017 “Addressing Women in the Greek Parliament: Institutional Confrontation or Sexist Aggression?” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(1): 30–57. 10.1075/jlac.5.1.02geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.02geo [Google Scholar]
24. Georgalidou, Marianthi, Katerina Frantzi, and George Giakoumakis
    2020 “Aggression in Media-Sharing Websites in the Context of Greek Political/Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict8(2): 321–350. 10.1075/jlac.00039.geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00039.geo [Google Scholar]
25. Hancock, Claire
    2015 “‘The Republic is Lived with an Uncovered Face’ (and a Skirt): (Un-)dressing French Citizens.” Gender, Place and Culture22(7): 1023–1040. 10.1080/0966369X.2014.958061
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958061 [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomedology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. hooks, bell
    2000 Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. 2nd edn. London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Jonathan Culpeper
    2010 “Historical (Im)politeness: An Introduction.” InHistorical (Im)Politeness, edited byJonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 9–36. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kiesling, Scott
    2018 “Masculine Stances and the Linguistics of Affect: On Masculine Ease.” NORMA13(3–4): 191–212. 10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756 [Google Scholar]
30. Kiesling, Scott
    2021 “The ‘Gay Voice’ and ‘Brospeak’: Toward a Systematic Model of Stance.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, edited byKira Hall, and Rusty Barrett. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
32. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
    2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 566–581. 10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz [Google Scholar]
33. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2005 “Politicizing Gender in Discourse: Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis as Political Perspective and Praxis.” InFeminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse, edited byMichelle M. Lazar, 1–30. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599901_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_1 [Google Scholar]
34. Mey, Jacob
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
37. Schippers, Mimi
    2007 “Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony.” Theory and Society361: 85–102. 10.1007/s11186‑007‑9022‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 [Google Scholar]
38. Sifianou, Maria
    2019 “Im/politeness and In/civility: A Neglected Relationship?” Journal of Pragmatics1471: 49–64. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008 [Google Scholar]
39. Weaver, Simon
    2011 “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G.” European Journal of Cultural Studies14(3): 249–264. 10.1177/1367549410396004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410396004 [Google Scholar]
40. Weaver, Simon
    2016 The Rhetoric of Racist Humour: US, UK and Global Race Joking. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315553504
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553504 [Google Scholar]
41. Whitehead, Kevin A., and Gene H. Lerner
    2009 “When are Persons ‘White’? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racial Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and Society20(5): 613–641. 10.1177/0957926509106413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509106413 [Google Scholar]
42. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
43. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    eds. 2016 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd edn.London: Sage. 10.4135/9781036235192
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192 [Google Scholar]
44. Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl
    2017 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byRuth Wodak, and Martin Reisigl, 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]