1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Fragile men and fishy arguments
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

What happens when someone tells you that you are offended, even though you do not feel offended yourself? Contested attributions of offence provide an interesting testing ground for how one’s feelings of offence can diverge from how offence is displayed in interaction. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of attributions of offence to ask on what grounds a speaker can be labelled as offended, even when the speaker does not claim any feelings of offence, as well as to what extent a speaker can deny being offended, when appearing to, indeed, be offended. We present a case study of an interaction from Twitter (X) stemming from an instance of failed humour, exploring the linguistic cues that people rely on when judging others to be offended. We find that disputes regarding offence are not actually necessarily to do with one’s feelings at all but instead relate to whether someone’s emotional involvement is perceived to be a barrier to their objectivity and argumentative strength.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
2026-02-03
2026-03-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax/jlac.00147.bax.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baxter-Webb, Ibi
    2025 “Calculating Costs or Weighing Social Relations? The Basis of the ‘Benefactive Order’ in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2025.2450995
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2025.2450995 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergmann, Jörg
    1998 “Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bousfield, Derek
    2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, Nick
    2024 “US Election: How Trump and His Followers Use Offensive Humour to Make Prejudice Acceptable.” The Conversation, February 16. 10.64628/AB.us4tqdpwr
     https://doi.org/10.64628/AB.us4tqdpwr [Google Scholar]
  7. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Douglas, Jack D.
    1970 “Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings.” InDeviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings, edited byJack D. Douglas, –. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Drew, Paul
    1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dynel, Marta, and Fabio I. M. Poppi
    2020 “Arcana Imperii: The Power of Humorous Retorts to Insults on Twitter.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.00031.dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00031.dyn [Google Scholar]
  14. Elder, Chi-Hé
    2021a “Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, edited byMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár and Marina Terkourafi, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2021b “Microaggression or Misunderstanding? Implicatures, Inferences and Accountability.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.020 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2024 Pragmatic Inference: Misunderstandings, Accountability, Deniability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009036672
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009036672 [Google Scholar]
  17. Garcia, Angela
    1991 “Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument.” American Sociological Review (): –. 10.2307/2096258
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2096258 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, Harold
    1956 “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/221800
     https://doi.org/10.1086/221800 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1964 “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities.” Social Problems (): –. 10.2307/798722
     https://doi.org/10.2307/798722 [Google Scholar]
  20. 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks
    1970 “On Formal Structures of Practical Action.” InTheoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, edited byJohn McKinney and Edward Tiyakian, –. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Günthner, Susanne
    1995 “Exemplary Stories: The Cooperative Construction of Moral Indignation.” Versus (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 1996 “The Prosodic Contextualization of Moral Work: An Analysis of Reproaches in ‘Why’-Formats.” InProsody in Conversation, edited byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haugh, Michael
    2015a Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240078
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240078 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015b “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018 [Google Scholar]
  26. Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
    2019 “‘The Apology Seemed (In)sincere’: Variability in Perceptions of (Im)politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Haugh, Michael, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
    2025 “Morality and Discourse.” InMorality in Discourse, edited byMichael Haugh and Rosina Márquez-Reiter, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197618066.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618066.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2018 “Accusations and Interpersonal Conflict in Televised Multi-Party Interactions Amongst Speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.00012.hau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00012.hau [Google Scholar]
  29. 2019 “Offence and Conflict Talk.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, edited byMatthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-12 [Google Scholar]
  30. Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Rosina Márquez Reiter
    2022 “Offence and Morality: Pragmatic Perspectives.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Heritage, John
    1988 “Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” InAnalysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, edited byCharles Antaki, –. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu, and Yulong Song
    2021 “Admonishing: A Paradoxical Pragmatic Behaviour in Ancient China.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.20022.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20022.kad [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Luckmann, Thomas
    1995 “On the Intersubjective Constitution of Morals.” InThe Prism of the Self, edited bySteven G. Crowell, –. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8408‑1_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8408-1_6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Malle, Bertram F., Steve Guglielmo, and Andrew E. Monroe
    2014 “A Theory of Blame.” Psychological Inquiry (): –. 10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340 [Google Scholar]
  39. Marcoccia, Michel
    2004 “On-line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Márquez-Reiter, Rosina, and Michael Haugh
    2019 “Denunciation, Blame and the Moral Turn in Public Life.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Matamoros-Fernández, Ariadna, and Aleesha Rodriguez
    2022 “Not Just a Joke: We Scoured TikTok for Anti-Asian Humour during the Pandemic and Found too Many Disappointing Memes.” The Conversation, September 30. 10.64628/AA.uh7xhtg3s
     https://doi.org/10.64628/AA.uh7xhtg3s [Google Scholar]
  42. Morris, G. H.
    1988 “Finding Fault.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X8800700101
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700101 [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Driscoll, Jim
    2020 Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350169708
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350169708 [Google Scholar]
  44. Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
    2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2016 “Criticizing Another’s Child: How Teachers Evaluate Students During Parent-Teacher Conferences.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404515000809
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000809 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfeffer, Jürgen, Daniel Matter, and Anahit Sargsyan
    2023 “The Half-Life of a Tweet.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media: –. 10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22228
     https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22228 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 “Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings.” Sociology (): –. 10.1177/003803857801200107
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200107 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2005 “On Complainability.” Social Problems (): –. 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
     https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schneider, Klaus P., and María Elena Placencia
    2017 “(Im)politeness and Regional Variation.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_21
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_21 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shaw, Chloe, and Alexa Hepburn
    2013 “Managing the Moral Implications of Advice in Informal Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.839095
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.839095 [Google Scholar]
  51. Sifianou, Maria, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2017 “(Im)politeness and Cultural Variation.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_22
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_22 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2017 “What Makes Teasing Impolite in Australian and British English? ‘Step[ping] over Those Lines […] you Shouldn’t Be Crossing.’” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0034
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0034 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sternau, Marit, Mira Ariel, Rachel Giora, and Ofer Fein
    2017 “Deniability and Explicatures.” InDoing Intercultural Pragmatics: Cognitive, Linguistic, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives on Language Use, edited byRachel Giora and Michael Haugh, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110546095‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110546095-006 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tayebi, Tahmineh
    2016 “Why do People Take Offence? Exploring the Underlying Expectations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  55. Townsend, Leanne, and Claire Wallace
    2016 Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_487729_en.pdf (accessed7 March 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
Loading
Fragile men and fishy arguments
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00147.bax
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: plausible deniability ; offence-taking ; moral transgressions ; offence attribution ; online interaction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error