Forensic linguistic evidence of psychological abuse and discursive manipulation in cyberstalking cases

References

1. al-Khateeb, Haider M., Gregory Epiphaniou, Zhara A. Alhaboby, James Barnes, and Emma Short
   2017 “Cyberstalking: Investigating Formal Intervention and the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Telematics and Informatics:–. 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.016
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.016 [Google Scholar]
2. Acquadro Maran, Daniela, and Tatiana Begotti
   2022 “Cyberstalking and Previous Offline Victimization in Italian Young Adults: The Role of Coping Strategies.” Social Sciences():–. 10.3390/socsci11120549
   https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120549 [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, John L.
   (1962) 2018 How to Do Things with Words. 7th edn.Eastford: Martino Fine Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benedetti, Novella
   2024 “Linguistic Analysis of Gender Asymmetry in Courtroom Interaction Discourse: Analysis of Questioning Strategies in Domestic Violence Trial in Italy.” Pragmalingüística: –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Benedetti, Novella
   (in press). “Cyberstalking And Gender-Based Violence In Italy: A Speech Act Analysis”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Benedetti, Novella, and Queralt, Sheila
   2023 “A Literature Review of the Role of Forensic Linguistics in Gender-based Violent Crimes in Italy: Supporting Legal Professionals and Providing Scientific Evidence.” Revista de Llengua i Dret, Journal of Language and Law: –. 10.58992/rld.i79.2023.3857
   https://doi.org/10.58992/rld.i79.2023.3857 [Google Scholar]
7. Brocardi
   Brocardi. “Art. 612-bis Codice Penale.” AccessedJuly 1, 2025. https://www.brocardi.it/codice-penale/libro-secondo/titolo-xii/capo-iii/sezione-iii/art612bis.html
8. Caponetto, Laura
   2018 “Filosofia del Linguaggio Femminista, Atti Linguistici e Riduzione al Silenzio.” Phenomenology and Mind:–. 10.13128/Phe_Mi‑24978
   https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-24978 [Google Scholar]
9. Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman
   2012 “Speech Acts within Facebook Status Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, :–. 10.1177/0261927X12438535
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438535 [Google Scholar]
10. Carter, Elisabeth
    2024 The Language of Romance Crimes: Interactions of Love, Money, and Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009273008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009273008 [Google Scholar]
11. Chiang, Emily, and Tim Grant
    2017 “Online Grooming: Moves and Strategies.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito():–.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chung, Kai L., and Lorraine Sheridan
    2022 “Perceptions of Stalking: Examining Perceivers’ Country of Origin, Perpetrator-Target Prior Relationship, and the Mediating Effect of Victim Responsibility.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, :–. 10.1177/08862605211042601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042601 [Google Scholar]
13. Ehrlich, Susan
    2001 Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. European Institute for Gender Equality
    European Institute for Gender Equality 2022 Cyber Violence against Women and Girls: Key Terms and Concepts. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/cyber_violence_against_women-and-girls_key_terms-and-concepts.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fairclough, Norman
    2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 3rd edn., –. London: Sage. 10.4135/9780857028020.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n6 [Google Scholar]
16. Flowers, Caroline, Belinda Winder, and Karen Slade
    2022 “‘You Want to Catch the Biggest Thing Going in the Ocean’: A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Stalking.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence():–. 10.1177/0886260520958632
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520958632 [Google Scholar]
17. García Collantes, Ángel, and María José Garrido Antón
    2021 Violencia y Ciberviolencia de Género. Valencia: Editorial Tirant lo Blanch.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grant, Tim, and Nicci MacLeod
    2020 Language and Online Identities: The Undercover Policing of Internet Sexual Crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108766425
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766425 [Google Scholar]
19. Green, Mitch S.
    2013 “Assertions.” InPragmatics of Speech Actions, edited byMarina Sbisà and Ken Turner, –. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214383.387
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383.387 [Google Scholar]
20. Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
    2016 “‘Real Men Don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
21. Havard, Tirion E., and Michelle Lefevre
    2020 “Beyond the Power and Control Wheel: How Abusive Men Manipulate Mobile Phone Technologies to Facilitate Coercive Control.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence():–. 10.1332/239868020X15850131608789
    https://doi.org/10.1332/239868020X15850131608789 [Google Scholar]
22. Heydon, Georgina
    2019 Researching Forensic Linguistics: Approaches and Applications. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429290640
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290640 [Google Scholar]
23. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
    Istituto Nazionale di Statistica 2015 La Violenza Contro le Donne Dentro e Fuori la Famiglia. Rome: ISTAT. https://www.istat.it/it/files//2015/06/Violenze_contro_le_donne.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
24. James, David V., and Lorraine Sheridan
    2020 “What Works in Risk Assessment in Stalking Cases.” InThe Wiley Handbook of What Works in Violence Risk Management, edited byStephen Wormith, Leam A. Craig, and Todd E. Hogue, –. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119315933.ch27
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119315933.ch27 [Google Scholar]
25. Kamphuis, Jan H., Paul M. G. Emmelkamp, and Anna Bartak
    2003 “Individual Differences in Post-Traumatic Stress Following Post-Intimate Stalking: Stalking Severity and Psychosocial Variables.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology:–. 10.1348/014466503321903562
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503321903562 [Google Scholar]
26. Kelly, Liz
    1988 Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kirwan, Gráinne, and Andrew Power
    2013 Cybercrime: The Psychology of Online Offenders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511843846
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843846 [Google Scholar]
28. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2007 “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis.” Critical Discourse Studies():–. 10.1080/17405900701464816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816 [Google Scholar]
29. Lindgren, Simon
    2018 “A Ghost in the Machine: Tracing the Role of ‘the Digital’ in Discursive Processes of Cybervictimization.” Discourse and Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481318766936
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318766936 [Google Scholar]
30. Lynn, Nicholas, and Patricia Canning
    2021 “Additions, Omissions, and Transformations in Institutional ‘Retellings.’” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito():–. 10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/8_1a5
    https://doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/8_1a5 [Google Scholar]
31. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Evans Craig, and Ruth Mullineux-Morgan
    2023 Online Child Sexual Grooming Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009314626
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009314626 [Google Scholar]
32. Maple, Carsten, Emma Short, and Antony Brown
    2011 Cyberstalking in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of the ECHO Pilot Survey. University of Bedfordshire. hdl.handle.net/10547/270578
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mullen, Paul E., Michele Pathé, and Rosemary Purcell
    2009 Stalkers and Their Victims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Noor, Natrah, and Bahiyah Abdul Hamid
    2021 “Cyberbullying in the Name of God: Critical Discourse Analysis of Online Responses to the Act of De-Hijabbing in Malaysia.” The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies():–. 10.17576/3L‑2021‑2704‑15
    https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2704-15 [Google Scholar]
35. Pence, Ellen, and Michael Paymar
    1993 Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer. 10.1891/9780826179913
    https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826179913 [Google Scholar]
36. Queralt, Sheila
    2022 Estafas amorosas. El donjuán seduce, convence y manipula. Barcelona: Editorial Larousse.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Queralt, Sheila
    2023 “Los aportes de la lingüística forense contra el cibercrimen”. Del Español. Revista de Lengua:–. 10.33776/dlesp.v1.7923
    https://doi.org/10.33776/dlesp.v1.7923 [Google Scholar]
38. Reyns, Bradford W.
    2019 “Online Pursuit in the Twilight Zone: Cyberstalking Perpetration by College Students.” Victims and Offenders():–. 10.1080/15564886.2018.1557092
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1557092 [Google Scholar]
39. Ribeiro Carreira, Rosângela A.
    2021 “WhatsApp e o Contexto Discursivo como Prova de Violência.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito():–. 10.21747/21833745/lanlaw8_2a4
    https://doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw8_2a4 [Google Scholar]
40. Roulet, Eddy
    1984 “Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics():–. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90061‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90061-4 [Google Scholar]
41. Searle, John R.
    1969/1975 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sgarbi, Chiara, and Laura De Fazio
    2014 “Lo Stalking: Profili Vittimologici e Strumenti di Tutela delle Vittime.” Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia:–. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/ric/article/view/1438
    [Google Scholar]
43. Short, Emma, Andrew Guppy, Jacqui A. Hart, and James Barnes
    2015 “The Impact of Cyberstalking.” Studies in Media and Communication():–. 10.11114/smc.v3i2.970
    https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v3i2.970 [Google Scholar]
44. Sorlin, Sandrine
    2017 “The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting Im/Politeness Theories.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002 [Google Scholar]
45. Spitzberg, Brian H., and William R. Cupach
    2014 The Dark Side of Relationship Pursuit: From Attraction to Obsession and Stalking. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203805916
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805916 [Google Scholar]
46. Sweet, Paige L.
    2019 “The Sociology of Gaslighting.” American Sociological Review():–. 10.1177/0003122419874843
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843 [Google Scholar]
47. Turell, María Teresa
    2005 Lingüística Forense, Lengua y Derecho: Conceptos, Métodos y Aplicaciones. Edited byMaría Teresa Turell. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada.
    [Google Scholar]
48. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society():–. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
49. Walker, Lenore E.
    (1979) 1980 The Battered Woman. Reprint edn.New York: William Morrow and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Weekes, Cassidy J., Jennifer E. Storey, and Afroditi Pina
    2025 “Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review.” Trauma, Violence, and Abuse():–. 10.1177/15248380251333411
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251333411 [Google Scholar]
51. Wilson, Chanelle, Lorraine Sheridan, and David Garratt-Reed
    2023 “Examining Cyberstalking Perpetration and Victimization: A Scoping Review.” Trauma, Violence, and Abuse():–. 10.1177/15248380221082937
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082937 [Google Scholar]
52. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, –. London: Sage. 10.4135/9780857028020.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n6 [Google Scholar]
53. Worsley, Joanne D., Jaqueline M. Wheatcroft, Emma Short, and Rhiannon Corcoran
    2017 “Victims’ Voices: Understanding the Emotional Impact of Cyberstalking and Individuals’ Coping Responses.” SAGE Open():–. 10.1177/2158244017710292
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710292 [Google Scholar]