1887
Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280

Abstract

This paper uses corpus-based methods to explore how British Parliamentary arguments against LGBT equality have changed in response to decreasing social acceptability of discriminatory language against minority groups. A comparison of the language of opposition to the equalisation of the age of consent for anal sex (1998–2000) is made to the oppositional language in debates to allow same-sex marriage (2013). Keyword, collocation and concordance analyses were used to identify differences in overall argumentation strategies, assessing the extent to which previously homophobic speech (e.g. homosexuality as ) has been replaced by more indirect strategies (e.g. less use of personalised argumentation via the pronoun ). We argue that while homophobic language appears to be on the decrease in such contexts, there is a mismatch between words and acts, requiring analysts to acknowledge the presence of more subtle indications of homophobic discourse in the future.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.3.1.03lov
2015-10-02
2019-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.3.1.03lov
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpus , debate , homophobia , keywords and parliament
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error