1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Whilst there has been much investigation of courtroom testimony and other linguistic aspects of legal process, there has been little consideration of the linguistic basis of war crimes tribunals such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which provides the data for this article. The testimony of witnesses in ICTY rape trials is investigated to discover how their examination by counsel may affect these alleged victims of a brutal war. The approach taken is textual as well as discoursal, focusing on the co-construction of meaning between counsel and witnesses — and its failures. The frequent meta discussions about the nature of truth in the testimony shows up some disjunction between the parties in their understanding of the process they are engaged in, leading to the conclusion that the witnesses may have been ‘revictimised’

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.4.2.01jef
2016-12-16
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archer, Dawn
    2011 “Facework and Im/politeness across Legal Contexts: An Introduction.” Journal of Politeness Research7: 1–19. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2011.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassham, Gregory
    2004Critical Thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cotterill, Janet
    2003Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O.J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010 “Interpersonal Issues in Court: Rebellion, Resistance and Other Ways of Behaving Badly.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham , 353–380. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte , and Emily Haslam
    2004 “Silencing Hearings? Victim-Witnesses at War Crimes Trials.” European Journal of International Law15 (1): 151–177. doi: 10.1093/ejil/15.1.151
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.1.151 [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew, Paul , and John Heritage
    (eds) 1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eades, Diana
    2008Courtroom Talk and Neocolonial Control. Berlin, DEU: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208320
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208320 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehrlich, Susan
    2001Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203459034
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203459034 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Charles
    1994 “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist96 (3): 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan , 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haack, Susan https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2008.00163.x [Google Scholar]
  13. ICTY
    . IT-96-23 &23/1 Case Information Sheet. AccessedJuly 12, 2013. www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/cis/en/cis_kunarac_al_en.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . IT-96-23 &23/1 Transcripts. AccessedJuly 12, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . IT-96-23 &23/1 Trial Chamber Judgement 22/02/2001. AccessedJuly 12, 2013. www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/tjug/en/kun-tj010222e.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . Key Figures. Updated 08/07/2013. AccessedJuly 12, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeffries, Lesley
    2003 “Not a Drop to Drink: Emerging Meanings in Local Newspaper Reporting of the 1995 Water Crisis in Yorkshire.” Text23 (4): 513–538.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2010Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04516‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2014a “Interpretation.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Peter Stockwell and Sarah Whiteley , 469–486. Cambridge: C.U.P.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014b “Critical Stylistics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Michael Burke , 408–420. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jeffries, Lesley , and Matthew Evans
    2015 “The Rise of Choice as an Absolute ‘Good’: A Study of British Manifestos, 1900–2010.” Language and Politics14 (6): 751–777.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeffries, Lesley , and Brian Walker
    2012 “Key Words in the Press: A Critical Corpus-Driven Analysis of Ideology in the Blair Years (1998– 2007).” English Text Construction5 (2): 208–229. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.2.03jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.2.03jef [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, Alison , and Ruth Clifford
    2011 “Polite Incivility in Defensive Attack: Strategic Politeness and Impoliteness in Cross-examination in the David Irving vs. Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt Trial.” Journal of Politeness Research7 (1): 43–71. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2011.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Komter, Martha
    2012 “The Career of a Suspect’s Statement: Talk, Text, Context.” Discourse Studies14 (6): 731–752. doi: 10.1177/1461445612457486
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457486 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mani, Rama
    2002Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Matoesian, Greg
    1993Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1998 “Discursive Hegemony in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial: Evidence of an Age Graded Allusion in Expert Testimony.” Pragmatics8 (1): 3–19. doi: 10.1075/prag.8.1.01mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.1.01mat [Google Scholar]
  28. 2005 “Nailing Down an Answer: Participations of Power in Trial Talk.” Discourse Studies7 (6): 733–759. doi: 10.1177/1461445605055424
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055424 [Google Scholar]
  29. McCaul, Kim
    2011 “Understanding Courtroom Communication through Cultural Scripts.” InExploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control, ed. by Anne Wagner and Le Cheng , 11–28. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Medica Mondiale
    2009 “...And that it does not Happen to Anyone Anywhere in the World”. The Trouble with Rape Trials: Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence during the War in the former Yugoslavia. www.medicamondiale.org/fileadmin/content/07_Infothek/Gerechtigkeit/medica_mondiale_-_Witness_Study_Bosnia_Summary_english.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Méndez, Juan E
    1997 “Accountability for Past Abuses.” Human Rights Quarterly19 (2): 255–282. doi: 10.1353/hrq.1997.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1997.0018 [Google Scholar]
  32. Minow, Martha
    1998Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrin, L.Timothy , H. Mitchell Caldwell , and Carol Chase
    2003The Art and Science of Trial Advocacy. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Silverstein, Michael
    2010 “Nōlō Contendere: American Legal Advocacy and the Verbal Agōn.” Humanities Day, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Simpson, Paul
    1993Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203312612
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stover, Eric
    2005The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in the Hague. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Teitel, Ruti G
    2000Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Theissen, Gunnar
    2004Supporting Justice, Co-existence and Reconciliation after Armed Conflict: Strategies for Dealing with the Past. Berlin: Berghof Forschungszentrum für konstruktive Konfliktbearbeitung. AccessedJuly 12, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑05642‑3_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05642-3_20 [Google Scholar]
  39. Weinstein, Harvey M. , and Eric Stover
    2004 “Introduction: Conflict, Justice and Reclamation.” InMy Neighbor, My Enemy. Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, ed. by Eric Stover and Harvey M. Weinstein , 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511720352.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720352.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.4.2.01jef
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error