1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280

Abstract

Despite its centrality to religiously aggravated hate crime recorded in England and Wales, the nature of the language used has been neglected in research. This paper, based on a unique dataset, aims to rectify this. It takes its approach from the field of linguistic impoliteness, a field that has yet to consider hate crime. Therein lies our second aim: To consider whether impoliteness notions can be usefully extended to the language of hate crime. In our data, we examine, in particular, conventionalized impoliteness formulae, insults, threats, incitement and taboo words. Whilst we reveal some linguistic support for the way religiously aggravated hate crime is framed in the law and discussed in the legal literature, we highlight areas of neglect and potential ambiguity. Regarding impoliteness, we demonstrate its effectiveness as an approach to these data, but we also highlight areas of neglect in that literature too, notably, non-conditional threats and incitement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
2017-10-02
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlac.5.1.01cul.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Archer, Dawn
    2005Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.135
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
  2. Asquith, Nicole
    2009 “The Harms of Verbal and Textual Hatred Hate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime.” InHate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime, edited by Paul Iganski , 161–173. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1962/1975 (2nd edn.) How to do Things with Words. Edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà . Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beebe, Leslie M.
    1995 “Polite Fictions: Instrumental Rudeness as Pragmatic Competence.” InLinguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, edited by James E. Alatis , Carolyn A. Straehle , Brent Gallenberger and Maggie Ronkin , 154–168. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bousfield, Derek
    2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulthard, Malcolm , and Alison Johnson
    2007An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Croom, Adam M.
    2013 “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language and Communication33 (3):177–204. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25: 349–367. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics42(12):3232–3245. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan , Marti, Leyla , Mei, Meilian , Nevala, Minna and Gila Schauer
    2010 “Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey.” Intercultural Pragmatics7–4: 597–624. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2010.027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.027 [Google Scholar]
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  15. Delgado, Richard
    1982 “Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review17:133–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fraser, Bruce , and William Nolen
    1981 “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language27:93–109. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.1981.27.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1981.27.93 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabriel, Yiannis
    1998 “An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations.” Human Relations51(11):1329–1354. doi: 10.1023/A:1016946332565
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016946332565 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The Culture Wars.” Journal of Politeness Research5:273–304. doi: 10.1515/JPLR.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 “Face, Identity, and Im/politeness: Looking Backwards, Moving forward – From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1):1–33. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar , Nuria Lorenzo-Dus , and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2013 “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 97–120. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar , and Maria Sifianou
    . Forthcoming. “(Im)politeness and Identity.” InHandbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness edited by Jonathan Culpeper , Michael Haugh and Dániel Kádár . Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi: 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan , 41–58. London and New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Harris, Sandra
    1984 “Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates’ Courts.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language49:5–28. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Holtgraves, Thomas
    2005 “Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, and Linguistic Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture1:73–93. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.73 [Google Scholar]
  26. Iganski, Paul
    2008Hate Crime and the City. Bristol: The Policy Press. doi: 10.1332/policypress/9781861349408.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861349408.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleinke, Sonja and Birte Bös
    2015 “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of Its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora.” Pragmatics25(1):47–71. doi: 10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurzon, Dennis
    1998 “The Speech Act Status of Incitement: Perlocutionary Acts Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics29(5):571–596. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00083‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00083-0 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lachenicht, Lance G.
    1980 “Aggravating Language: A Study of Abusive and Insulting Language.” International Journal of Human Communication13 (4):607–688. doi: 10.1080/08351818009370513
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818009370513 [Google Scholar]
  30. Langton, Rae
    1993 “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs22:293–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Limberg, Holger
    2009 “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics41(7):1376–1394. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Locher, Miriam A.
    2006 “Polite Behaviour within Relational Work: The Discursive Approach to Politeness.” Multilingua25(3):249–267. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 “Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction.” InHandbooks of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communicationedited by Gerd Antos , and Eijos Ventola , 509–540. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Locher, Miriam A. and Derek Bousfield
    2008 “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield , and Miriam A. Locher , 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  35. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield , and Miriam A. Locher , 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martínez-Cabeza, Miguel A.
    2009 “Dangerous Words: Threats, Perlocutions and Strategic Actions.” InCognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data, edited by Wiesław Oleksy , and Piotr Stalmaszczyk , 269–284. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsuda, Mari
    1989 “Public Responses to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story.” Michigan Law Review87:2320–2381. doi: 10.2307/1289306
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1289306 [Google Scholar]
  38. Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea
    2000Delete Expletives?: Research Undertaken jointly by the Advertising Standards Authority, British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting Standards Commission and the Independent Television Commission. London: ASA, BBC, BSC and ITC.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rudanko, Juhani
    2006 “Aggravated Impoliteness and Two Types of Speaker Intention in an Episode in Shakespeare's Timon of Athens.” Journal of Pragmatics38(6):829–841. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  40. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics39:639–656. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2008Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (2ndedn). London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tedeschi, James T. , and Richard B. Felson
    1994Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10160‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10160-000 [Google Scholar]
  43. Terkourafi, Marina
    2001Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics3:179–201. doi: 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
  45. 2003 “Generalised and Particularised Implicatures of Politeness.” InPerspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, edited by Peter Kühnlein , Hannes Rieser , and Henk Zeevat , 151–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.114.09ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.114.09ter [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas, Jenny
    1995Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tracy, Karen
    2008 “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture4(2):169–191. doi: 10.1515/JPLR.2008.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. Walters, Mark Austin
    2013 “Conceptualizing ‘Hostility’ for Hate Crime Law: Minding ‘the Minutiae’ when Interpreting Section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies34(1):47–74. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqt021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt021 [Google Scholar]
  49. Watts, Richard J.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  50. Young, Stacy L.
    2004 “Factors that Influence Recipients’ Appraisals of Hurtful Communication.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21:291–303. doi: 10.1177/0265407504042833
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042833 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): hate crime , identity , impoliteness , incitement , insults , religion , taboo words and threats
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error