1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Immigration has been and remains a conspicuous topic in American political debate, and the ongoing refugee crisis in Europe, exasperated by the Syrian conflict, has brought the issue of Muslim immigration into focus. The topic has been exploited, among others, by the presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. His proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S. achieved great resonance and stimulated passionate discussion. This discussion, which displayed a high degree of xenophobia and verbal aggression, is the target of this paper’s investigation. Material was collected from Trump’s official Facebook page and was analyzed using Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistic methods. The results highlight the strategies employed in discourse that aims to posit Muslims as “Others” and as incompatible with American society, as well as dangerous, aggressive, and inferior, through the choice of semantic, syntactic, and rhetorical discursive structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.2.07kno
2017-11-23
2019-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akbarzadeh, Shahram , and Bianca Smith
    2005The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media. Melbourne: Monash University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Awass, Omer
    1996 “The Representation of Islam in the American Media.” Hamdard Islamicus19(3):87–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baider, Fabienne , and Maria Constantinou
    2014 “How to Make People Feel Good When Wishing Hell: Golden Dawn and National Front Discourse, Emotions and Argumentation.” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014, edited by Jesus Romero-Trillo , 179–210. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul , and Tony McEnery
    2005 “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics4(2):197–226. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , Majid Khosravinik , Michal Krzyżanowski , Tony McEnery , and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19(3):273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , and Tony McEnery
    2012 “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics34:255–278. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048 [Google Scholar]
  7. Billig, Michael
    1988 “The Notion of ‘Prejudice’: Some Rhetorical and Ideological Aspects.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse8(1–2):91–110. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1‑2.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.91 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brigadir, Igor , Derek Greene , and Padraig Cunninghamg
    2015 “Analyzing Discourse Communities with Distributional Semantic Models.” Presentation at the2015 ACM Web Science Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom. researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstream/handle/10197/6613/websci15-preprint.pdf?sequence=1 doi: 10.1145/2786451.2786470
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2786451.2786470 [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa
    1993 “From Discourse Analysis to Critical Discourse Analysis: The Differential Representation of Women and Men Speaking in Written News.” InTechniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, edited by Gwyneth Fox , Michael Hoey , and John M. Sinclair , 196–208. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cap, Piotr
    2014 “Applying Cognitive Pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A Proximization Analysis of Three Public Space Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics70:16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cisneros, J. David
    2008 “Contaminated Communities: The Metaphor of ‘Immigrant as Pollutant’ in Media Representations of Immigration.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs11(4):569–601. doi: 10.1353/rap.0.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0068 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, Mark
    2008- “The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-Present.” corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
  13. Dunn, Kevin
    2001 “Representations of Islam in the Politics of Mosque Development in Sydney.” Tijdschrit voor Economische en Sociale Geografie92(3):291–308. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9663.00158
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00158 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1995Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flowerdew, Lynne
    2004 “The Argument for Using English Specialized Corpora to Understand Academic and Professional Settings.” InDiscourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics, edited by Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton , 11–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.16.02flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.02flo [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabrielatos, Costas , and Paul Baker
    2008 “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005.” Journal of English Linguistics36(1):5–38. doi: 10.1177/0075424207311247
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gattino, Silvia , and Stefano Tartaglia
    2015 “The Effect of Television Viewing on Ethnic Prejudice Against Immigrants: A Study in The Italian Context.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations44:46–52. doi: http://0‑dx.doi.org.library.svsu.edu/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.004
    https://doi.org/http://0-dx.doi.org.library.svsu.edu/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hafez, Kai
    2000Islam and the West in the Mass Media: Fragmented Images in a Globalizing World. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hart, Christopher
    2013 “Argumentation Meets Adapted Cognition: Manipulation in Media Discourse on Immigration.” Journal of Pragmatics59:200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hart, Christopher , and Piotr Cap
    eds. 2014Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hunston, Susan
    2002Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kassimeris, George , and Leoni Jackson
    2015 “The Ideology and Discourse of the English Defence League: ‘Not Racist, Not Violent, Just No Longer Silent’.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations17(1):171–188. doi: 10.1111/1467‑856X.12036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12036 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kilgarriff, Adam , Vit Baisa , Jan Bušta , Milos Jakubíček , Vojtech Kovář , Jan Michelfeit , Pavel Rychly , and Vit Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on.” Lexicography1(1):7–36. doi: 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilgarriff, Adam , Pavel Rychly , Pavel Smrz , and David Tugwell
    2004 “The Sketch Engine.” InProceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress, edited by Geoffrey Williams and Sandra Vessier , 105–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Koester, Almut
    2010 “Building Small Specialised Corpora.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy , 66–79. New York, NY: Routledge doi: 10.4324/9780203856949.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Krishnamurthy, Ramesh
    1996 “Ethnic, Racial and Tribal: The Language of Racism.” InTexts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard , 129–149. London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewis, Justin M. W. , Paul Mason , and Kerry Moore
    2011 “Images of Islam in the UK: The Representation of British Muslims in the National Press 2000–2008.” InPointing the Finger: Islam and Muslims in the British Media, edited by Julian Petley and Robin Richardson , 40–65. Oxford: Oneworld.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lirola, Maria Martinez
    Ed. 2014Discourses on Immigration in Times of Economic Crisis: A Critical Perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mamadouh, Virginie
    2012 “The Scaling of The ‘Invasion’: A Geopolitics of Immigration Narratives in France and The Netherlands.” Geopolitics17(2):377–401. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2011.578268
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.578268 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mårtensson, Ulrika
    2014 “Hate Speech and Dialogue in Norway: Muslims ‘Speak Back’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(2):230–248. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.851473
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.851473 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2009 “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 122–141. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Musolff, Andreas
    2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(1):41–56. doi: 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Keeffe, Anne , Michael McCarthy , and Ronald Carter
    2007From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
  35. Orpin, Debbie
    2005 “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(1):37–61. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp [Google Scholar]
  36. Partington, Alan
    2006 “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) At Work.” Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs171:267–304. doi: 10.1515/9783110199895.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895.267 [Google Scholar]
  37. Perren, Lew , and Charles Dannreuther
    2013 “Political Signification of the Entrepreneur: Temporal Analysis of Constructs, Agency and Reification.” International Small Business Journal31(6):603–628. doi: 10.1177/0266242612441809
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612441809 [Google Scholar]
  38. Prentice, Sheryl , and Andrew Hardie
    2009 “Empowerment and Disempowerment in the Glencairn Uprising: A Corpus-based Critical Analysis of Early Modern English News Discourse.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics10(1):23–55. doi: 10.1075/jhp.10.1.03pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.03pre [Google Scholar]
  39. Reisigl, Martin , and Wodak, Ruth
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Richardson, John E.
    2004a(Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2004bIslamophobia: Issues, Challenges and Action. Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rojo, Luisa Martin , and Teun A. van Dijk
    1997 “‘There Was A Problem, And It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society8(4):523–566. doi: 10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  43. Salama, Amir H. Y.
    2011 “Ideological Collocation and the Recontexualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam Post-9/11: A Synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society22(3):315–342. doi: 10.1177/0957926510395445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395445 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sinclair, John
    1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Smolla, Rodney
    1992Free Speech in an Open Society. New York: Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stefanowitsch, Aanatol , and Stefan T. Gries
    2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8 (2):209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  47. Steuter, Erin , and Deborah Wills
    2010 “‘The Vermin Have Struck Again’: Dehumanizing the Enemy in Post 9/11 Media Representations.” Media, War & Conflict3(2):152–167. doi: 10.1177/1750635210360082
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635210360082 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stubbs, Michael
    1992 “Institutional Linguistics: Language and Institutions, Linguistics and Sociology.” InThirty Years of Linguistic Evolution, edited by Martin Putz , 189–214. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.61.18stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.18stu [Google Scholar]
  49. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1991Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society4 (2):249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  51. van Dijk, Tuen A.
    2000a “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak , 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2000b “The Reality of Racism: On Analyzing Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” InFestschrift Für die Wirklichkeit, edited by Guido Zurstiege , 211–226. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑87330‑9_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87330-9_23 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society17(3):359–383. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
  54. van Leeuwen, Theo , and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies1(1):83–118. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wodak, Ruth
    Ed. 1989Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (Vol.7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wodak, Ruth , and Meyer, Michael
    (2015) “Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd edition), edited by Ruth Wodak , and Michael Meyer , 1–22. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodak, Ruth , and Teun A. van Dijk
    Eds. 2000Racism at the Top: The Investigation, Explanation and Countering of Xenophobia and Racism. Klagenfurt: Drava.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.2.07kno
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.5.2.07kno
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Corpus Linguistics , Critical Discourse Analysis , immigration , Muslims , social media and xenophobia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error