1887
Volume 17, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jlp.00017.edi-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.00017.edi
2018-11-06
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bayley, Paul
    (ed) 2004 “Introduction. The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. byPaul Bayley, 1–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bischof, Karin, and Marion Löffler
    2016 “The Gendered Construction of the Demos. Parliamentary Debates on the Integration of Former National Socialists into the Austrian Demos.” Paper presented at theEuropean Conference on Politics and Gender (ECPG), Uppsala, Sweden, June 13, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bischof, Karin
    2015Global Player EU? Eine ideologiekritische Metaphernanalyse. Bielefeld: transcript. 10.14361/9783839431153
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839431153 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bischof, Karin, and Stoegner Karin
    2009 “Towards a Comprehensive View on Prejudice.” InHandbook of Prejudice, ed. byAnton Pelinka, Karin Bischof, and Karin Stoegner, 443–462. Amherst: Cambria Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burkhardt, Armin
    2003Das Parlament und seine Sprache: Studien zu Theorie und Geschichte parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Tübingen: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110914092
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914092 [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, David F. J., and Christian Schaller
    (eds) 2002Demokratiequalität in Österreich: Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven, Opladen. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑09585‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09585-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chappell, Louise
    2002 “The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” InWomen, Politics and Change, ed. byKaren Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton, Paul
    2003 “Introduction.” Journal of Language and Politics2(1): 1–3. 10.1075/jlp.2.1.02chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.02chi [Google Scholar]
  9. Dörner, Andreas
    2003 “Politische Kulturforschung.” InPolitikwissenschaft. Ein Grundkurs, ed. byHerfried Münkler, 587–619. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dörner, Andreas, and Ludgera Vogt
    (eds) 1995Sprache des Parlaments und Semiotik der Demokratie. Beiträge zur politischen Kommunikation in der Moderne. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Every, Danielle and Augoustinos, Martha
    2007 “Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers.” Discourse and Society18(4): 411–436. 10.1177/0957926507077427
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507077427 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fiske, Susan T., and Alyssa L. Norris
    2009 “Sexism and Heterosexism.” InHandbook of Prejudice, ed. byAnton Pelinka, Karin Bischof, and Karin Stoegner, 77–118. Amherst: Cambria Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox, Ruth
    2011Parliaments and Public Engagement: Innovation and Good Practice From Around the World. London: Hansard Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grad Fuchsel, H. and Martín Rojo, L.
    2003 “‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ nationalist discourses in Spanish parliamentary debates.” Journal of Language and Politics2(1): 31–70. 10.1075/jlp.2.1.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.04gra [Google Scholar]
  15. Habermas, Jürgen
    1992Faktizität und Geltung – Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Habermas, Jürgen
    1996Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansard Society
    Hansard Society (2011) Connecting Citizens to Parliament, How Parliament can engage more effectively with hard to reach groups. London: Hansard Society. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansard Society
    Hansard Society (2013) #futurenews: The Communication of Parliamentary Democracy in a Digital World. London: Hansard Society. https://assets.contentful.com/u1rlvvbs33ri/3x5fTrhbji6AQswyGMcwMA/48f494c8e1b4523dc7ab63f39027e69a/Publication__Future-News-the-Communication-ofParliamentary-Democracy-in-a-Digital-World.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Henderson, Ailsa
    2007Hierarchies of Belonging. National Identity and Political Culture in Scotland and Quebec. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie and Kari Palonen
    (eds.) 2016Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ilie, Cornelia
    2001 “Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of confrontation.” InR. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.) Language and ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches, 235–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.205.14ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.205.14ili [Google Scholar]
  22. 2004 “Insults as (Un)parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. byPaul Bayley, 45–86. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili [Google Scholar]
  23. 2010European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2013 “Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization20(3): 501–521. 10.1080/13510347.2013.786547
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.786547 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
    2012Parliamentary Discourses across Cultures: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kerner, Ina
    2009Differenzen und Macht: zur Anatomie von Rassismus und Sexismus. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Klinger, Cornelia, Gudrun-Axeli Knapp, Birgit Sauer
    2007Achsen der Ungleichheit. Zum Verhältnis von Klasse, Geschlecht und Ethnizität. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Krastev, Ivan
    2007 “The Populist Moment.” Critique and Humanism23(1): 103–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
    2008The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, George
    1999 “Metaphor, Morality, Politics: Or, Why Conservatives have Left Liberals in the Dust.” InWorkings of Language: From Prescriptions to Perspectives, ed. byRebecca S. Wheeler, 139–155. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leston-Bandeira, Cristina
    2012 “Studying the relationship between parliament and citizens.” Journal of Legislative Studies18(3–4): 265–274. 10.1080/13572334.2012.706044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706044 [Google Scholar]
  32. Leston-Bandeira, Cristina, and David Bender
    2013 “How deeply are parliaments engaging on social media?” Information Polity18(4): 281–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lovenduski, Joni
    2012 “Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual.” British Politics7(4): 314–340. 10.1057/bp.2012.13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.13 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynen von Berg, Heinz
    2000Politische Mitte und Rechtsextremismus: Diskurse zu fremdenfeindlicher Gewalt im 12. Deutschen Bundestag (1990–1994). Opladen: Springer VS.10.1007/978‑3‑663‑11086‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11086-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayer, Stefanie, Edma Ajanovic, and Birgit Sauer
    2014 “Intersections and Inconsistencies. Framing Gender in Right-wing Populist Discourses in Austria.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research22(4): 250–266. 10.1080/08038740.2014.964309
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.964309 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morlino, Leonardo
    2009Qualities of Democracy: How to Analyze Them. Florence: Institute Italiano di Scienze.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Musolff, Andreas
    2004Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  38. Müller, Jan-Werner
    2017Was ist Populismus? Ein Essay. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ochoa Espejo, Paulina
    2011The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Palonen, Kari
    2016Vote as the last speech act in parliamentary debate. Presented atECPR General Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, September 8, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rancière, Jacques
    1999Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Salzborn, Samuel
    2012Demokratie. Theorie, Formen, Entwicklung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwarz-Friesel, Monika, and Jehuda Reinharz
    2013Die Sprache der Judenfeindschaft im 21 Jahrhundert, Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stoegner, Karin
    2014Antisemitismus und Sexismus. Historisch-gesellschaftliche Konstellationen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Taggart, Paul
    2004 “Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies9(3): 269–288. 10.1080/1356931042000263528
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528 [Google Scholar]
  47. Theiner, Patrick, Julia Schwanholz, and Andreas Busch
    2017Parliaments 2.0? Digital Media Use by National Parliaments in the EU. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Urbinati, Nadia
    1998 “Democracy and Populism.” Constellations5(1): 110–124. 10.1111/1467‑8675.00080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00080 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wengeler, Martin
    2000 “Argumentationsmuster im Bundestag. Ein diachroner Vergleich zweier Debatten zum Thema Asylrecht.” InSprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation, ed. byArmin Burkhardt and Cornelia Pape, 221–240. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wodak, Ruth and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2017 “Introduction: Right-wing populism in Europe and USA.” Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
  51. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2011 “Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” InPolitical Languages in the Age of Extremes, ed. byWillibald Steinmetz, 351–379. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk
    2000Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Yuval-Davis, Nira
    2011The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446251041
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251041 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.00017.edi
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error