1887
Volume 14 Number 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article examines China’s Confucius Institute program, a significant language policy/planning initiative. I adopt a political perspective in looking into the birth of this language policy initiative, focusing on its role in reconstructing China’s national identity in the context of its rise and its international relations. I explore the background against which the Confucius Institute initiative was formed, and analyse how this initiative was received in the West and how China responded to it. I argue that China is undergoing a reconstruction of its national identity and the Confucius Institute initiative is a major part of this effort. I suggest that such a reconstruction of national identity is an interactive process with an outcome resulting from China’s negotiation with the international community, involving China stating a new position, listening to international responses, clarifying and elaborating upon its position until its new position is accepted by the international community.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.14.6.03liu
2015-12-30
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey , and Rui Gao
    2007 “Remembrance of Things Past: Cultural Trauma, the “Nanking Massacre” and Chinese Identity.” InPeking-Yale University Conference Publication on Tradition & Modernity: Comparative Perspectives, 266–294. Beijing: Peking ­University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allport, Gordon
    1954The Nature of Prejudice. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baidu.com
    2011 “China’s GDP”. baike.baidu.com/view/368359.htm#2. Accessed25 July 2012.
  4. Baidu Wenku
    . “Jiashen Cultural Declaration”. wenku.baidu.com/view/b55d2f3143323968011c92a9.html. Accessed26 March 2013.
  5. Berenskoetter, Felix
    2007 “Friends, There Are No Friends? An Intimate Reframing of the International.” Millennium35 (2): 647–676. doi: 10.1177/03058298070350031501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070350031501 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bush, George W
    2002 “State of The Union Address.” stateoftheunionaddress.org/2002-george-w-bush. Accessed25 July 2012.
  7. Chey, Jocelyn
    2008 “Chinese ‘Soft Power’, Cultural Diplomacy and the Confucius Institutes.” The Sydney Papers20 (1): 32–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. China Youth Newspaper
    2004 “Jiashen Wenhua Xuanyan: Nalilai? Naliqu?” (The Year of ­Jia-shen 2004. Cultural declaration: where from? Where to?). blog.bcchinese.net/sltao/articles/1775.aspx. Accessed25 July 2012.
  9. China.com.cn
    2004 “2004 wenhua gaofeng luntan jin luomu, tongguo ‘Jiashen Wenhua ­Xuanyan’.” (The cultural summit forum concludes with passing of the “Year of Jia-shen 2004. Cultural Declaration). news.china.com/zh_cn/domestic/945/20040905/11864501.html. Accessed25 July 2012.
  10. 2009 “Xin Tsinghua Guoxueyuan nengfou jiumeng chongwen?” (Can the new Tsinghua School of Chinese Classics revive its old dream?)www.china.com.cn/culture/txt/2009–11/05/content_18833204.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  11. 2010 “Guojia Hanban: jian kongzi xueyuan de mudi bu zaiyu wenhua shentou.” (Hanban: The aim of establishing CI is not for cultural penetration.) www.china.com.cn/international/txt/2010–08/03/content_20630847.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  12. 2011 “Yangzhou daxue chengban ‘Yuyan yu guojia de anquan he fazhan’ luntan.” (Yangzhou University hosting the forum “Language and national security and development”). www.china.com.cn/education/mingxiao/2011–04/15/content_22366287.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  13. Confucius Institutes/Classroom
    2011 “About Us.” CI/Classroom. www.hanban.org/confuciousinstitutes/node_10961.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  14. 2014 “About Confucius Institutes/Classrooms”. www.hanban.org/confuciousinstitutes/node_10961.htm. Accessed26 November 2015.
  15. d’Hooghe, Ingrid
    2007The Rise of China’s Public Diplomacy. Clingendael, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Du, Junling
    2011 “Guojia Hanban zhuren: Kongzi xueyuan shi zhi ‘wenhua chuanbo tontzijun’.” (Director of Hanban: CIs are an army of “scouts spreading the culture”). Renmin Zhengxie Bao, 1st November.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Du, Lin
    2011 “CIs Exerts Pressure and China Displays Soft Power.” Voice of America. www.voanews.com/chinese/news/20111103-China-Says-No-Talking-Tibet-in-Confucius-Institutes-133188683.html. Accessed25 July 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster, Peter
    2011 “China Rises: US Warns Beijing is Expanding its Military Power.” The Telegraph, 25th August.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Glaser, Bonnie S. , and Evan S. Medeiros
    2007 “The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-­making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of ‘Peaceful Rise’.” The China Quarterly190: 291–310. doi: 1010.1017/S0305741007001208
    https://doi.org/1010.1017/S0305741007001208 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gov.cn
    2009 “Jiaoyubu, guojia hanban deng jieshou jizhe caifang tan kongzi xueyuan de fazhan.” (Ministry of Education and Hanban talk about development of CIs in media interview). www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009–03/15/content_1260011.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  21. 2010 “Disi jie ‘yuyuan yu guojia’ gaoceng luntan zhizai tuijin yuyan wenzi fazhan.” (The fourth “Language and the Nation” summit forum aims at promoting development of the Chinese language and written script). www.gov.cn/gzdt/2010–10/12/content_1720031.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  22. Guangming Daily
    2004 “70 wei zhuanjia xuezhe lianming fabiao jiashen wenhua xuanyan.” (70 experts and scholars jointly issue the Jias-hen Cultural Declaration). www.gmw.cn/01gmrb/2004–09/06/content_94060.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  23. Guangming Wang
    2013 “410 suo Kongzi Xueyuan bianbu quanqiu 110 ge guojia” (410 Confucius Institutes in 110 countries all over the world). difang.gmw.cn/hb/2013–03/15/content_7016755.htm. Accessed10 September 2013.
  24. Guoxuejiaoyu.com , Xueyuan Jianjie
    . “About the School.” School of Chinese Classics, Renmin University. guoxue.guoxuejiaoyu.com/xygk_displaynews.asp?id=74. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  25. Hanban
    2004 Constitution and By-Laws of the CIs. english.hanban.org/node_7880.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  26. Hartig, Falk
    2010 “Confusion about CIs: Soft Power Push or Conspiracy? A Case Study of CIs in Germany.” Paper presented at the 18th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia .
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hegel, Georg
    1999 “The German Constitution.” InPolitical Writings, ed. by Laurence Dickey and H. B. Nisbet , 6–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Herz, John
    1951Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Reality. ­Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hobsbawm, Eric , and Terence Ranger
    (eds.) 2003The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Honneth, Axel
    1996The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. London: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Huayuqiao.org
    2005 “Shoujie ‘Yuyan yu Guojia’ gaoceng luntan zai Jinan Daxue juxing.” (The first summit forum “Language and the Nation” held at Jinan University). www.huayuqiao.org/hyqnews/hyqnews_20082005.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  32. Huntington, Samuel
    1996The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jordan, Winthrop
    1968White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550–1812. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kant, Immanuel
    1991 “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” InKant: Political Writings, ed. by Hans Reiss , 41–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lebow, Richard Ned
    1976White Britain and Black Ireland: Social Stereotypes and Colonial ­Policy. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008 “Identity and International Relations”. International Relations22 (4): 473–492. doi: 10.1177/0047117808097312
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117808097312 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leach, Ben
    2009 “Foreign Donors Threaten Academic Freedom at UK Universities.” The ­Telegraph, 28th March.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, Yuming
    2004 “Language of a World Power and Language that makes a World Power.” Guangming Daily, 28th July.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004a “Strategies and Measures to make the Chinese Language Powerful in the Age of Information.” China Information Times15: 7–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Liheng
    2007 “Zhongwai hezuo Jianli Kongzi xueyuan de wenti yu duice.” (Issues in establishing CIs jointly by China and foreign countries and measures in solving these issues). Journal of Shenyang Normal University31 (3): 145–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maslen, George
    2007 “Australia: Warning – be Wary of CIs.” University World News8, 2nd December.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nye, Joseph
    1990Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2004Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Paradise, James F
    2009 “China and International Harmony: The Role of CIs in Bolstering ­Beijing’s Soft Power.” Asian Survey Xlix (4): 647–669. doi: 10.1525/as.2009.49.4.647
    https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.4.647 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rawls, John
    1999A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Renmin Zhengxie Bao
    2011 “Guojia Hanban Zhuren: Kongzi Xueyuan shi zhi ‘wenhua chuanbo tongzijun’”. (Director of Hanban: CIs are “cultural scouts”). Renmin Zhengxie Bao, 1st November.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Robertson, Matthew
    2011 “Confucius Say: Generous Gifts Hide Ethical Compromise.” The Drum Opinion, 2ndMarch. www.abc.net.au/unleashed/44588.html. Accessed25 July 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rusciano, Frank
    2003 “The Construction of National Identity A 23-nation Study.” Political Research Quarterly56 (3): 361–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Saunders, Phillip C
    2006 “China’s Global Activism: Strategy, Drivers, and Tools.” Institute for National Strategic Studies Occasional Paper 4. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schmitt, Carl
    1976The Concept of the Political. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Singh, Michael
    2001 “Advocating the Sustainability of Linguistic Diversity.” InAustralian ­Policy Activism in Language and Literacy, ed. by J. Lo Bianco and Risie Wickert , 107–130. ­Melbourne: Language Australia Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Spiering, Menno , and Michael Wintle
    (eds.) 2011 European Identity and the Second World War. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230306943
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306943 [Google Scholar]
  53. Steffenhagen, Janet
    2008 “Has BCIT Sold Out to Chinese Propaganda?” The Vancouver Sun, 2nd April.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Taylor, Charles
    1992 “The Politics of Recognition.” InMulticulturalism and ‘The Politics of ­Recognition’: An Essay by Charles Taylor, ed. by Amy Gutmann , 25–74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tsu, Jing
    2006Failure, Nationalism, and Literature: The Making of Modern Chinese Identity, 1895–1937. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. University World News
    2011 “China’s CIs, Rectification of Statues.” University World News, 20th January.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wen Jiabao
    2005 “Report on the Work of the Government”. news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005–03/14/content_2695646.htm. Accessed9 April 2013.
  58. Wenxin Rugu
    2004 “Zhongguo wenhua de ligenxing zhijiu: Mixin he mangcong” (The ninth wickedness of the Chinese culture: Superstition and blind following). www.360doc.com/content/10/0720/15/985653_40307633.shtml. Accessed26 November 2015.
  59. Wistrich, Robert , and David Ohana
    (eds.) 1995The Shaping Of Israeli Identity: Myth, Memory, And Trauma. London; Portland, Or.: F. Cass.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Xinhua Net
    2006 “Confucius Institutes: Promoting Language, Culture and Friendliness.” news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006–10/02/content_5521722.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  61. 2009 “Confucius Institutes not for Exporting China Values, Official Says”. news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009–04/19/content_11214687.htm. Accessed10 April 2013.
  62. Xu, Lin
    2010 “Report on the Review of Work by the CI Headquarters in 2010 and Planning for 2011”. Speech at the 5th CI Conference Program , 10th December 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 2010 “Report on the 2010 Work Plan of the CI Headquarters.” CI6 (1): 16–19. doi: 10.2174/157339510790231815
    https://doi.org/10.2174/157339510790231815 [Google Scholar]
  64. Yangcheng Evening News
    2007 “Jiashen Wenhua Xuanyan jingshi women shenme” (What warning does the Year of Jia-shen Cultural Declaration give us?). www.ycwb.com/ycwb/2007–01/04/content_1338637.htm. Accessed25 July 2012.
  65. Zheng, Bijian
    2003 “A New Path for China’s Peaceful Rise and the Future of Asia.” history.boaoforum.org/English/F2003nh/dhwi/t20031103_184101btk. Accessed25 July 2012.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.14.6.03liu
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error