1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper attempts to make a critical cognitive analysis of US strategic intelligence reports and aims at investigating language strategies and cognitive biases that occur in the reports and how the reports create the “realities” that may influence policymakers’ decisions. The data for analysis include seven reports released by US Intelligence Community which analyze, more or less, the Sino-US relations currently and in the foreseeable future as well as the implications of a rising China on US policies. The analytic framework is built up by integrating Critical Metaphor Analysis, Conceptual Blending Theory and Discourse Space Theory, each of which deal with different aspects of the discourse and on the whole provide a comprehensive analysis of it. The critical cognitive analysis of intelligence reports could disclose the views that analysts hold on particular issues, providing valuable reference for understanding or evaluating their reports’ contents, and reveal the ideology inherent in US strategic thinking, helping to estimate US strategic policies in the long term.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.1.04zha
2016-04-29
2019-08-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beer, A. Frabcis and Christ’l De Landtsheer
    2004Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz, Bruce D. , and Alan E. Goodman
    1989Strategic Intelligence for American National Security. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruce, James B.
    2008 “Making analysis more reliable: Why epistemology matters to intelligence.” InAnalyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles, and Innovations, ed. by George, Roger Z. , and James B. Bruce , 171–190. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cap. Piotr
    2013Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2005 “Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift: Toward a Discourse Space Theory.” InAnnual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Francisco Jose Ruiz de Mendoza , 78–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1996Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York/Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William and Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, Vyvyan , and Melanie Green
    2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1994Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1997Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fauconnier, Gilles , and Mark Turner
    2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Filardo Llamas, Laura
    2010 “Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The legitimization of the 1998 Agreement.” InPolitical Discourse and Conflict Resolution: Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, ed. by Hayward, Katy and Catherine O’Donnell , 210–229. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2012 “To live in the heart (and mind) of others: The construction of memory in Northern Irish Commemorative Plaques.” CADAAD5(2): 152–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Filardo, Laura
    2008 “A comparative study of the discursive legitimation of the agreement by the four main Northern Irish Political parties throughout time.” Ethnopolitics, 7: 21–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frawley, William
    1992Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goatly, Andrew
    1997The Language of Metaphor. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hansen, Lene
    2006Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hart, Christopher
    2007 “Critical discourse analysis and conceptualization: Mental spaces, blended spaces and discourse spaces in the British National Party.” InCognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory, ed. by Christopher Hart & Dominik Lukes , 106–130. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2008 “Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: toward a theoretical framework.” Critical Discourse Studies5(2): 91–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2012 “Moving beyond metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA: Construal operations in immigration discourse.” InCritical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart , 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015 “Discourse.” InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Eva Dabrowska and Dagmar Divjak , 331–346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Heuer, Richards
    1999Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, Lock. K.
    (ed.) 2007Strategic Intelligence, Volumes 1-5. Westport: Praeger Security International.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kent, Sherman
    1949Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kovecses, Zoltan
    2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, George
    1993 “The contemporary theory of metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought, 2nd edition, ed. by Andrew Ortony , 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, George , & Mark Turner
    1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nuyts, Jan
    2001Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Saeed, John. I.
    1997 Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Schaffner, Christina and Anita L. Wenden
    1995Language and Peace. Aldersot: Dartmouth.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Steen, Gerard , Aletta, G. Dorst , J. Berenike Herrmann , Anna, A. Kaal , Tina Krennmyr and Trijntje Pasma
    2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.1.04zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.1.04zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error