Software as ideology

References

1. Adami, Elizabetta , and Gunther Kress
   2010 “The Social Semiotics of Convergent Mobile Devices: New Forms of Composition and the Transformation of Habitus”. InMultimodality. A social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication by Gunther Kress , 184–204. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arlov, Per
   1997 Microsoft Office 97 – Professional. Oslo: IDG Books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bertelsen, Olav , and Søren Pold
   2004 “Criticism as an Approach to Interface Aesthetics.” InProceedings of the third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 23–32. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1028014.1028018
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1028014.1028018 [Google Scholar]
4. Danielsen, Kristin
   1991 Innføringskurs i Microsoft Word [Introduction Course to Microsoft Word]. Sandefjord: Easy Data.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Djonov, Emilia , and Theo van Leeuwen
   2011 “The Semiotics of Texture.” Visual Communication10(4): 541–564. doi: 10.1177/1470357211415786
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211415786 [Google Scholar]
6. Djonov, Emilia , and Theo van Leeuwen
   2013a “Between the Grid and Composition: Layout in PowerPoint’s Design and Use.” Semiotica197: 1–34. doi: 10.1515/sem‑2013‑0078
   https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0078 [Google Scholar]
7. Djonov, Emilia , and Theo van Leeuwen
   2013b “Bullet Points, New Writing, and the Marketization of Public Discourse. A Critical Multimodal Perspective.” InCritical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse, edited by Emilia Djonov , and Sumin Zhao , 232–250. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Edwards, Benji
   2008 “Microsoft Word Turns 25” I InPC World. AccessedDecember 10. 2015www.pcworld.com/article/152585/microsoft_word_program.html#slide1.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fairclough, Norman
   2003 Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fairclough, Norman
    1996 “Technologisation of Discourse”. InText and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byCarmen Caldas-Couthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 71–83. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Norman
    1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Harlow.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Forbes
    . Undated. “The World’s Biggest Public Companies.” AccessedDecember 10. 2015, www.forbes.com/global2000/.
13. Fuller, Matthew
    (ed.) 2008 Software Studies – a Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062749.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062749.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Fuller, Matthew
    2003 Behind the Blip – Essays on the Culture of Software. New York: Autonomedia.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Husby, Monica , Kjell Willersrud , and Roar Fjeldbo
    1994 Microsoft Word 6.0. Videregående kurs. Med øvingsdiskett [Microsoft Word 6.0 Advanced Course. With Exercise Disk]. Sandefjord: Easy Data.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Husby, Monica , Roar Fjeldbo , and Kjell Willersrud
    1995 Microsoft Word – versjon 6.0, norsk. Videregående kurs – med øvingsdiskett [Microsoft Word – Version 6.0, Norwegian. Advanced Course - with Exercise Disk]. Sandefjord: Easy Data.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jewitt, Carey , and Gunther Kress
    2003 Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kress, Gunther , and Theo van Leeuwen
    2006 [1996] Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kuldbrandstad, Lars Anders
    2005 Språkets mønstre. Grammatiske begreper og metoder [Patterns of language. Grammatical Concepts and Methods]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kvåle, Gunhild
    2015 “Multimodale modellar i Microsoft Word. Programvare som semiotisk ressurs” [Multimodal Models in Microsoft Word. Software as Semiotic Resource]. InKontekst, språk og multimodalitet. Nyere sosialsemiotiske perspektiver [Context, Language and Multimodality. New Perspectives from Social Semiotics], edited by Gunhild Kvåle , Eva Maagerø , and Aslaug Veum , 153–169. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ljunggren, Margaret
    1998 Avansert Microsoft Word 97. Step by Step [Advanced Microsoft Word 97. Step by Step]. Nesbru: Vett & Viten AS.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Machin, David , and Andrea Mayr
    2012 How to do Critical Discourse Analysis. A Multimodal Introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Machin, David , and Theo van Leeuwen
    2005 “Language Style and Lifestyle: the Case of a Global Magazine.” Media, Culture & Society27 (4): 577–600. doi: 10.1177/0163443705054151
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443705054151 [Google Scholar]
24. Manovich, Lev
    2001 The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Manovich, Lev
    2013 Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Microsoft
    Microsoft. Undated. “Create a SmartArt Graphic.” AccessedDecember 10. 2015, https://support.office.com/en-ca/article/Create-a-SmartArt-graphic-fac94c93-500b-4a0a-97af-124040594842.
27. Microsoft
    Microsoft 1983 “Undo. Windows.” (Microsoft Word advertisment). Retrieved fromByte. The Small Systems Journal8 (12): 90–91.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2005 Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Van Leeuwen, Theo , Emilia Djonov , and Kay O’Halloran
    2013 “David Byrne really does Love PowerPoint. Art as Research on Semiotics and Semiotic Technology.” Social Semiotics23 (3): 490–423. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2012.738998
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.738998 [Google Scholar]
30. Zhao, Sumin , Emilia Djonov , and Theo van Leeuwen
    2014 “Semiotic Technology and Practice: a Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint.” Text & Talk34(3): 349–375. doi: 10.1515/text‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]