Volume 15, Issue 4
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Political discourses are found not only in speeches and newspapers, but also in cultural artefacts such as architecture, art and music. Turkey’s June 2013 protests saw an explosion of music videos distributed on the internet. This paper uses these videos as a case study to examine the limits and potential of popular music’s articulation of popular and populist politics. Though both terms encompass what is “widely favoured”, populism includes discourses which construct “the people” pitted against “an elite”. Past research has shown how popular music can articulate subversive politics, though these do not detail what that subversion means and how it is articulated. This paper uses specific examples to demonstrate how musical sounds, lyrics and images articulate populist and popular politics. From a corpus of over 100 videos, a typical example is analysed employing social semiotics. It is found that popular music has the potential to contribute to the public sphere, though its limits are also exposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.03way
2016-10-07
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abousnnouga, Gill and Machin, David
    2010 “Analysing the language of war monuments”. Visual Communication9 (2): 131–149. doi: 10.1177/1470357210369884
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369884 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amnesty International
    Amnesty International 2013.“Gezi Park protests: Brutal denial of the right to peaceful assembly in Turkey.” Accessed on12 February 2013, www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=20991
  3. Barış, Ruken
    2010 “Media Landscape: Turkey”. Accessed19 December 2011, www.ejc.net/media_landscape/article/turkey/
  4. Carpentier, Nico
    2007 “Populaire toegang en toegankelijkheid in de massamedia: publiek debat of demagogisch populisme? Een (de)constructieve dialoog met ‘Populisme'.’’ Advocare15: 47–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de Bellaigue, Christopher
    2013 “Turkey: surreal, menacing…pompous.” New York Review of Books, accessed2 March 2013, www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/dec/19/turkey-surreal-menacing-pompous/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Cleen, Benjamin and Carpentier, Nico
    2010 “Contesting the populist claim on ‘the people’ throughpopular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang.” Social Semiotics20 (2): 175–196. doi: 10.1080/10350330903565899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903565899 [Google Scholar]
  7. Eriksson, Göran
    2015 “Ridicule as a strategy for the recontextualization of the working class: A multimodal analysis of class-making on Swedish Reality Television”. Critical Discourse Studies12 (1): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2014.962067
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.962067 [Google Scholar]
  8. Freedom House
    Freedom House 2014Freedom of the press 2014, accessed6 February 2015, https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2014#.VNRye52UemO
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frith, Simon
    1981Sound Effects. New York: Pantheon books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1988 “Art ideology and pop practice.” InMarxism and the interpretation of culture, edited by Grossberg and Nelson . Chicago: University of Illinois Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑19059‑1_33
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_33 [Google Scholar]
  11. 1993 “Youth/Music/Television.” InSound and vision, edited by Frith, Goodwin and Grossberg , 67–84. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, Andrew
    1993Dancing in the Distraction Factory: music television and popular culture. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grossberg, Lawrence
    1987 “Rock and roll in search of an audience.” InPopular music and communication, edited by Lull . Beverly Hills: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M.A.K.
    1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hallin, Dan and Mancini, Paulo
    2004Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790867
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hebdige, Dick
    1979Subculture: The meaning of style. Suffolk: Metheun & co.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hesmondhalgh, David and Negus, Keith
    2002 “Popular music studies: meanings, power and value.” InPopular Music Studies, edited by Hesmondhalgh and Negus , 1–10. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hibbett, Ryan
    2005 “What is indie rock?” Popular music and society28 (1): 55–77. doi: 10.1080/0300776042000300972
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0300776042000300972 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hudson, Alexandra
    2013 “Woman in red becomes leitmotif for Istanbul’s female protesters.” Reuters, accessed4 June 2013, in.reuters.com/article/2013/06/03/turkey-protests-women-idINDEE9520HY20130603
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Huq, Rupa
    2002 “Raving not drowning: authenticity, pleasure and politicsin the electronic dance scene.”InPopular Music Studies, edited by Hesmondhalgh and Negus , 90–102. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenkins, Gareth
    2012 “A house divided against itself: the deteriorating state of media freedom in Turkey.” Central Asia-Caucasus Instituteaccessed2 February 2012, www.silkroadstudies.org/new/inside/turkey/2012/120206A.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kress, Gunter and Van Leeuwen, Theo
    1996Reading İmages: The Grammar of visual design. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kress, Gunter and van Leeuwen, Theo
    2001Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lynskey, Dorian
    201033 revolutions per minute: a history of protest songs. London: Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Machin, David
    2007Introduction to multimodal analysis. London: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2010Analysing popular music: Images, sound, text. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446280027
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280027 [Google Scholar]
  28. Machin, David and Richardson, John
    2012 “Discourses of unity and purpose in the sounds of fascist music: a multimodalapproach.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (4): 329–345 doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.713203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.713203 [Google Scholar]
  29. Machin, David and van Leeuwen, Theo
    2005 “Computer games as political discourse: the case of Black Hawk Down.” Journal of Language and Politics4 (1): 119–141. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.1.06mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.06mac [Google Scholar]
  30. Moore, Allan
    2002 “Authenticity as authentication.” Popular music2 (2): 209–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Özguneş, Neslihan and Terzis, Georgios
    2000 “Constraints and remedies for journalists reporting national conflict: The case of Greece and Turkey.” Journalism Studies (3): 405–426. doi: 10.1080/14616700050081759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700050081759 [Google Scholar]
  32. Railton, Diane and Watson, Paul
    2011Music video and the politics of representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633227.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633227.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Solomon, Thomas
    2005 “Living underground is tough’:Authenticity and locality in the hip-hop community in Istanbul,Turkey.” Popular MusicVolume 24 (1) :1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0261143004000273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143004000273 [Google Scholar]
  34. Storey, John
    2003Cultural theory and popular culture. An introduction. Harlow: PearsonEducation.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Street, John
    1986Rebel rock: The politics of popular music. Oxford: Basil Blackwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sümer, Çağdaş and Yaşlı, Fatih
    2010Hegemonyadan Diktoryaya AKP ve Liberal-Muhafazakar İttifak. Ankara: Tan Kitapevi Yayınları.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tagg, Philip
    1983Nature as a musical mood category. Göteborg: IASPM Internal Publications. Accessed5 January 2011, www.tagg.org/articles/xpdfs/nature.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1984 “Understanding musical time sense.” InTvarspel – Festskrift for Jan Ling (50 a°r). Goteborg: Skriften fran Musikvetenskapliga Institutionen. Accessed5 January 2011, www.tagg.org/articles/xpdfs/timesens.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1990 “Music in mass media studies. Reading sounds for example.”InPopular Music Research 2, edited by Roe and Carlsson . Göteborg: Nordicom-Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Traynor, Ian and Letsch, Constanze
    (2013) “Turkey divided more than ever by Erdoğan’s Gezi Park Crackdown.” The Guardian, accessed11.02.2015, www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/20/turkey-divided-erdogan-protests-crackdown
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Uzgel, İlhan and Duru, Bülent
    2010AKP Kitabı Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara: Pheoenix Yayınevi.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. ”Discourse and Society4 (2): 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  43. van Leeuwen, Theo
    1995 “Representing social action. ”Discourse and society6 (1): 81–106. doi: 10.1177/0957926595006001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1996 “The representation of social actors.” InTexts and Practices – Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Caldas-Coulthard and Coulthard , 32–70. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1999Speech, music, sound. London:Macmillan Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑27700‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2005Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Way, Lyndon
    2012 “Pop’s subversive potential: Turkish popular music videos as a multi-modal site of resistance.” Multimodal Communication1 (3): 251–275
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2013 “Discourses of popular politics, war and authenticity in Turkish pop music.” Social Semiotics. 23 (5): 715–734. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2013.819723
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.819723 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014 “Özgünlük ve Direniş Hikayeleri: Popüler Müzikte Protesto Potansiyeli”. Kültür ve İletişim Dergisi. 17 (1): 39–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Way, Lyndon and Gedik, Ali
    2013 “Music and Image: Popular Music’s Resistance to Conservative Politics. ”Paper presented atEge University 14th cultural studies symposium – Confinement, Resistance, Freedom. İzmir, TurkeyMay 8–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams, Raymond
    1976Key Words. London: Fontana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wingstedt, Johnny , Brandstrüm, Sture , and Berg
    , Jan. 2010 “Narrative Music, Visuals and Meaning in Film. ”Visual Communication9 (2): 193–210 doi: 10.1177/1470357210369886
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369886 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wright, Will
    1975Six Guns and Society: A structural study of the western. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Yeşiltaş, Murat
    2009 “Soft balancing in Turkish foreign policy: the case of the 2003 Iraq War.” Perceptions14 (1): 25–51.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.03way
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.03way
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): popular music; Popular politics; populist politics; protest; Turkey and authenticity

Most Cited