1887
Volume 15, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines the role of chronotopes in a municipal campaign to make English the official language. Drawing on theories of scale, localism, and chronotopes in discourse, this article traces how 30 town residents situated the English language in local and US history through talk and gesture. By evoking two contrasting chronotopes as they created and interpreted the language policy, people positioned monolingualism as a local tradition and multilingualism as a new, outside threat. Yet these chronotopes of local time and distant time were also recursive and fluid in two key ways. First, the US could be aligned with or against the local, which allowed English-only advocates to simultaneously criticize the nation and appeal to an idealized US past. Second, some critics of the policy reconfigured the chronotopes in order to posit multilingualism as the more authentic local tradition. These moves allowed the people involved to support, redefine and resist the English-only movement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.05flo
2016-10-07
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2007aLanguage and Social Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007b “Recombinant Selves in Mass Mediated Spacetime.”Language & Communication27 (3): 320–335. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. American Community Survey
    American Community Survey 2012Lino Lakes: Language Spoken at Home. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Applebome, Peter
    2010 “Small New York Town Makes English the Law.” New York Times, May12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Backhaus, Peter
    2012 “Language Policy at the Municipal Level.” InCambridge Handbook of Language Policy, ed. by Bernard Spolsky , 226–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.014 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baron, Dennis
    1990The English-only Question: An official language for Americans?New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauman, Richard , and Charles L. Briggs
    2003Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, Jan
    2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  10. Canagarajah, A. Suresh
    (ed) 2005Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cienki, Alan J.
    2004 “Bush’s and Gore’s Language and Gestures in the 2000 US Presidential Debates: A Test Case for Two Models of Metaphors.” Journal of Language and Politics3 (3): 409–440. doi: 10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  12. Crawford, James
    1989Bilingual Education: History, Politics, Theory, and Practice. Trenton, NJ: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1992Hold your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of English Only. New York: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Davidson, Deanna
    2007 “East Spaces in West Times: Deictic Reference and Political Self-positioning in a Post-socialist East German Chronotope.” Language & Communication27 (3): 212–226. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Cillia, Rudolf , Martin Reisigl , and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society10 (2): 149–173. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dick, Hilary Parsons
    2010 “Imagined Lives and Modernist Chronotopes in Mexican Nonmigrant Discourse.” American Ethnologist37 (2): 275–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1548‑1425.2010.01255.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01255.x [Google Scholar]
  17. 2011 “Making Immigrants Illegal in Small-Town USA.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology21 (1): 35–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2011.01096.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01096.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Masso, Andrés , Angela Castrechini , and Sergi Valera
    2014 “Displacing Xeno-racism: The Discursive Legitimation of Native Supremacy through Everyday Accounts of ‘Urban Insecurity.’” Discourse & Society25 (3): 341–361. doi: 10.1177/0957926513519531
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513519531 [Google Scholar]
  19. Doyle, Niki
    2009 “Albertville Adopts English as Official Language.” AL.com (Alabama), June2.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Duchêne, Alexandre , and Monica Heller
    (eds.) 2012Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodwin, Charles
    1994 “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist96 (3): 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heller, Monica
    2011Paths to Post-Nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Horner, Bruce , Min-Zhan Lu , Jacqueline Jones Royster , and John Trimbur
    2011 “Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach.” College English73 (3): 303–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hult, Francis M.
    2010 “Analysis of Language Policy Discourses across the Scales of Space and Time.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language202: 7–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jack, Jordynn
    2006 “Chronotopes: Forms of Time in Rhetorical Argument.” College English69 (1): 52–73. doi: 10.2307/25472188
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25472188 [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, David Cassels
    2009 “Ethnography of Language Policy.” Language Policy8 (2): 139–159. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑009‑9136‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson, Eric J. and David Cassels Johnson
    2015 “Language Policy and Bilingual Education in Arizona and Washington State.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism18 (1): 92–112. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.882288
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.882288 [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnstone, Barbara
    2013Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945689.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945689.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Irvine, Judith T. and Susan Gal
    2000 “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” InRegimes of Language, ed. by Paul V. Kroskrity , 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Knezevich, Alison
    2012 “Maryland Counties Seek to Make English Official Language. Baltimore Sun, March11.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kotlowitz, Alex
    2007 “Our Town.” New York Times, August5.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kremer, Rich
    2014 “Polk County Makes English its Official Language.” Wisconsin Public Radio, January30.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lawton, Rachele
    2008 “Language Policy and Ideology in the United States: A Critical Analysis of ‘English Only’ Discourse.” Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, Vol.2, ed. by Majid Khosravinik and Alexandra Polyzou , 78–103. University of Lancaster.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Leeman, Jennifer
    2004 “Racializing Language: A History of Linguistic Ideologies in the US Census.” Journal of Language and Politics3 (3): 507–534. doi: 10.1075/jlp.3.3.08lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.08lee [Google Scholar]
  35. Lempert, Michael , and Michael Silverstein
    2012Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lillis, Theresa , and Mary Jane Curry
    2010Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lo Bianco, Joseph
    2007 “Protecting English in an Anglophone Age.” InInternational Handbook of English Language Teaching, ed. by Jim Cummins and Chris Davison , 169–183. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑46301‑8_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_13 [Google Scholar]
  38. Marschall, Melissa J. , Elizabeth Rigby , and Jasmine Jenkins
    2011 “Do State Policies Constrain Local Actors? The Impact of English Only Laws on Language Instruction in Public Schools.” Publius: The Journal Of Federalism41 (4): 586–609. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjr003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjr003 [Google Scholar]
  39. May, Stephen
    2001Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McCarty, Teresa L.
    (ed) 2011Ethnography and Language Policy. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Menken, Kate
    2008English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Money Magazine
    Money Magazine 2011 “Best Places to Live.” CNNMoney, December5.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Norris, Sigrid
    2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pennycook, Alastair
    1998English and the Discourses of Colonialism. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2010Language as a Local Practice. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Perrin, Daniel
    2011 “Language Policy, Tacit Knowledge, and Institutional Learning: The Case of the Swiss Public Service Broadcaster SRG SSR.” Current Issues in Language Planning12 (3): 331–348. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2011.604953
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.604953 [Google Scholar]
  47. Petersoo, Pille
    2007 “What Does ‘We’ Mean?: National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language & Politics6 (3): 419–436. doi: 10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet [Google Scholar]
  48. Pietikäinen, Sari
    2013 “Spatial interaction in Sámiland: Regulative and Transitory Chronotopes in the Dynamic Multilingual Landscape of an Indigenous Sámi Village.” International Journal of Bilingualism18 (5): 478–490. doi: 10.1177/1367006913484210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484210 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pratt, Mary Louise
    2012 “‘If English was Good Enough for Jesus…’: Monolinguismo y Mala Fe.” Critical Multilingualism Studies1 (1): 12–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Prior, Paul , and Jody Shipka
    2003 “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.” InWriting Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, ed. by Charles Bazerman and David R. Russell , 180–238. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. ProEnglish
    ProEnglish 2007 “Texas Town’s English Ordinance has Teeth.” The ProEnglish Advocate13 (1): 7–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. ProEnglish
    ProEnglish 2008 “ProEnglish helps Nashville English Initiative Qualify for Ballot.” The ProEnglish Advocate14 (3): 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. ProEnglish
    ProEnglish 2010 “ProEnglish Fights for Lino Lakes’ Official English Victory.” The ProEnglish Advocate16 (3): 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Ramanathan, Vaidehi , and Brian Morgan
    2007 “TESOL and Policy Enactments: Perspectives from Practice.” TESOL Quarterly41 (3): 447–463. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00080.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00080.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Rosario, Ruben
    2011 “Flak aside, English-only Bill is Still Pure Pandering.” St. Paul Pioneer Press (St. Paul, Minnesota), January22.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Silverstein, Michael
    1979 “Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” InThe Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne , William F. Hanks , and Carol L. Hofbauer , 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2003 “The Whens and Wheres’-as well as Hows’-of Ethnolinguistic Recognition.” Public Culture15 (3): 531–557. doi: 10.1215/08992363‑15‑3‑531
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-3-531 [Google Scholar]
  58. Spolsky, Bernard
    2004Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2009Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626470 [Google Scholar]
  60. Staub, Andrew
    2010 “Forty Fort Council Rejects English-only Ordinance.” Citizens Voice (Luzerne County, Pennsylvania), September8.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tardy, Christine M.
    2009 “‘Press 1 for English’: Textual and Ideological Networks in a Newspaper Debate on US Language Policy.” Discourse and Society20 (2): 265–286. doi: 10.1177/0957926508099006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508099006 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2011 “Enacting and Transforming Local Language Policies.” College Composition and Communication62 (4): 634–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. The Economist 2010 “English Only Spoken Here.” July16.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Trimbur, John
    2006 “Linguistic Memory and the Politics of U.S. English.” College English68 (6): 575–588. doi: 10.2307/25472176
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25472176 [Google Scholar]
  65. U. S. Census Bureau
    U. S. Census Bureau 2010Lino Lakes QuickFacts. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wiley, Terrence G.
    1998 “The Imposition of World War I Era English-only Policies and the Fate of German in North America.” InLanguage and Politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and Realities, ed. by Thomas Ricento and Barbara Burnaby , 211–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Wilgoren, Jodi
    2002 “Divided by a Call for a Common Language.” New York Times, July19.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Woolard, Kathryn A.
    2008 “Language and Identity Choice in Catalonia: The Interplay of Contrasting Ideologies of Linguistic Authority.” InLengua, Nacion, e Identidad: La Regulación del Plurilingüismo en España y América Latina, ed. by Kirsten Süselbeck , Ulrike Mühlschlegel , and Peter Masson , pp.303–323. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert/Madrid: Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2013 “Is the Personal Political? Chronotopes and Changing Stances toward Catalan Language and Identity.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism16 (2): 210–224. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2012.720670
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.720670 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wortham, Stanton , and Catherine Rhodes
    2012 “The Production of Relevant Scales: Social Identification of Migrants during Rapid Demographic Change in One American Town.” Applied Linguistics Review3 (1): 75–99. doi: 10.1515/applirev‑2012‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0004 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wright, Zeke
    2011 “English-only town law is rescinded in Jackson, N.Y. Revote follows letter from AG.” Bennington Banner (Bennington, Vermont), June3.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Young, Blaine
    2012 “Interview with Suzanne Bibby.” The Blaine Young Show (Frederick, Maryland), February22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGaio3PMn5w.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuen, Laura
    2012 “English-only Measure still Divides Lino Lakes.” Minnesota Public Radio, March12.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.05flo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.4.05flo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bakhtin , chronotope , discourse , English , English-only movement , gesture , language ideology , language policy , local , nationalism and scale
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error