1887
Volume 15, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article is conceptualised within the framework of a historiographical approach to critical discourse analysis ( Flowerdew 2012 ). It focusses on a critical moment in Hong Kong’s socio-political development, the Occupy movement, and a specific language event, an interview on a local Hong Kong English-language television programme discussing the rationale for the movement. A micro-analysis of the interaction focusses on important features of the historical context, intertextual links, the backgrounds and the roles of the participants, and the argumentations strategies used by them. The article shows how a focus on a critical moment in discourse can shed light on the bigger socio-political picture and how arguments regarding particular topics may reflect larger ideological struggles, the political agendas of different groups, and the ways arguments are constructed dialogically in response not only to the words of interlocutors, but also in relation to prior (and future) discourses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
2016-11-29
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achugar, Mariana
    2008What We Remember: The Construction Of Memory In Military Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.29 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman, Bruce , and James Fishkin
    2004Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. by and trans. by C. Emerson . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chugani, Michael
    2014 “Just a stooge act.” South China Morning Post14April.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Devitt, Amy
    1991 “Intertextuality in Tax Accounting.” InTextual Dynamics of the Professions, ed. by Charles Bazerman , and James Paradis , 336–357. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1992Discourse and Social Change. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, Isabela , and Norman Fairclough
    2012Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Flowerdew, John
    1998The Final Years of British Hong Kong. London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin’s Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑26135‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26135-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2012Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230336841
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230336841 [Google Scholar]
  12. Greatbatch, David
    1986 “Aspects of Topical Organisation in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by News Interviewees.” Media Culture and Society8 (4): 441–455. doi: 10.1177/0163443786008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H. P.
    1989/1967 “Logic and Conversation.” InStudies in the Way of Words, ed. by H. P. Grice , 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, John
    1985 “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for Overhearing Audiences.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun van Dijk , 95–117. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hutchby, Ian
    1991 “The Organization of Talk on Talk Radio”. InBroadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell , Chapter 7, 119–137. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kristeva, Julia
    1980Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hymes, Dell
    1974Foundations of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marwick, Arthur
    2001The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rojo, Luisa Martin
    (ed.) 2014 Special Issue ofJournal of Language and Politics13:4.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wodak, Ruth
    2002 “The Discourse Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak , and Michael Meyer , 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error