Constructing the “self” and the “other” in Bush’s political discourse before and after the Iraq war (2002–2008)

References

1. Baker, Paul , and Ellece, Sibonile
   2011 Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. USA: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cap, Piotr
   2015 “Follow-ups in the US anti-terrorist discourse: Proposal for a macro-discursive approach to monologic follow-up sequences.” Discourse & Society, in print. doi: 10.1177/0957926515581155
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515581155 [Google Scholar]
3. Carter, Ralph
   1998 “Congress and Post-Cold War U.S. Foreign Policy”. InAfter the End: Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World, ed. by Scott, J. M , 108–137. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822382157‑005
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382157-005 [Google Scholar]
4. Chilton, Paul
   2004 Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ‘Dicator’
   ‘Dicator’ 2006 Oxford Wordpower. UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Engel, Dominik
   2004 Modelling Self and Other: A Hybrid Approach to the Analysis of Images of Self and Other in the Radio Addresses Delivered by the American President Before and After 9/11. Master thesis: University of Salzburg.
7. Fairclough, Norman
   1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fairclough, Norman
   2001 Language and Power, 2nd edition. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Graham, Phil ., Keenan, Thomas ., and Dowd, Anne-Maree
   2004 “A call to arms at the end of history: A discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror.” Discourse & Society15(2): 199–221. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041017
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041017 [Google Scholar]
10. Halliday, Michael ., and Christian Matthiessen
    2004 An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hodge, Robert Ian V. , and Kress Gunther R.
    1993 Language as ideology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kandil, Magdi A.
    2009 The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in American, Arab, and British media: Corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Master thesis: Georgia State University.
13. Kull, Steven , Clay Ramsay ., Stefan Subias ., and Evan Lewis
    2004 US public beliefs on Iraq and the presidential election. Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks. Available atwww.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Iraq/IraqReport4_22_04.pdf (Accessed: January 6 2012).
14. Lazar, Annita ., and Michelle M. Lazar
    2004 “The discourse of the new world order: ‘Out-casting’ the double face of threat.” Discourse & Society15(2): 223–242. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041018
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041018 [Google Scholar]
15. Mazid, Bahaa-eddin
    2007 “Presuppositions and strategic functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 speech: A critical discourse analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics6(3): 351–375. doi: 10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz [Google Scholar]
16. Oddo, John
    2011 “War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in four US presidential addresses.” Discourse & Society22(3): 287–314. doi: 10.1177/0957926510395442
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442 [Google Scholar]
17. ‘Regime’
    ‘Regime’ 2006 Oxford Wordpower. UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Simpson, Paul , and Andrea Mayr
    2009 Language and Power: A Resource Book for Students. UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sowińska, Agnieszka
    2013 “A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008).” Discourse & Society24(6): 792–809. doi: 10.1177/0957926513486214
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486214 [Google Scholar]
20. Thompson, Geoff
    2004 Introducing functional grammar. UK: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 “Opinions and ideologies in the Press.” InApproaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan, Bell ., and P. Garrett , 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2000 “Widening information gaps and policies of prevention.” InDigital democracy: Issues of theory and practice, ed. by Hacker, Kenneth L. , and Teun A., Van Dijk , 166–183. London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781446218891.n10
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891.n10 [Google Scholar]
23. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Politics, ideology, and discourse.” InEncyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. by Keith, Brown , 728–740. UK: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00722‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7 [Google Scholar]
24. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    1993 “Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: a synopsis.” Discourse and Society4(2): 193–223. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002004 [Google Scholar]
25. Weintraub, Megan
    2007 “The formative power of wartime rhetoric: A critical discursive analysis of presidential speeches.” Gnovis Journal8(1): 48–63.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Williams, Michael
    2011 The good war: NATO and the liberal conscience in Afghanistan. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230348660
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348660 [Google Scholar]
27. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth , and Michael Meyer , 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wodak, Ruth , and Michael Meyer
    2001 “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth , and Michael Meyer , 1–13. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]