1887
Volume 15, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper studies the Belarusian nation as envisioned by the president in his political speeches delivered on the country’s Independence Day. The theoretical framework of the paper rests upon an understanding of the discursive construction of national identity. This analysis of the presidential speeches utilizes principles of the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA). As a special genre of texts, political speeches aim to offer normative guidance and a sense of societal consensus to the public. The paper reveals that in the construction of a national community in Belarus, the presidential speeches ambiguously refer to historical memory, socio-economic development, the political system and the country’s foreign relations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
2017-01-31
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict
    2006Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baranova, Olga
    2008 “Nationalism, Anti-Bolshevism or the Will to Survive? Collaboration in Belarus under the Nazi Occupation of 1941–1944.” European Review of History15 (2): 113–28. doi: 10.1080/13507480801931044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13507480801931044 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bekus, Nelly
    2010Struggle over Identity. The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness.”Budapest: CEU Press. doi: 10.7829/9789639776685Bekus
    https://doi.org/10.7829/9789639776685Bekus [Google Scholar]
  4. “Belarus Country Report.”
    “Belarus Country Report.” 2012 Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  5. Benke, Gertraud
    2003 “From Prices and Prizes to Outmoded Things. Neutrality and Identity in the Speeches of Austrian Presidents on the National Holiday (26.10.) in the Second Republic.” InNATO, Neutrality and National Identity. The Case of Austria and Hungary, edited by András Kovács and Ruth Wodak , 103–46. Vienna: Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brass, Paul R.
    1991Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brüggemann, Mark
    2010 “Koloniales sprachliches Erbe: Sprache und Nation in Lukaschenkas Belarus.” Osteuropa60 (12): 69–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Buhr, Renee L. , Victor Shadurski , and Steven Hoffman
    2011 “Belarus: An Emerging Civic Nation?” Nationalities Papers39 (3): 425–40. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2011.565319.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2011.565319 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Hui-Ching , and Rich Holt
    2009 “Taiwan and ROC: A Critical Analysis of President Chen Shui-Bien’s Construction of Taiwan Identity in National Speeches.” National Identities11 (3): 301–30. doi: 10.1080/14608940903082885
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940903082885 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiari, Bernhard , and Robert Maier
    2004 “Volkskrieg und Heldenstädte: Zum Mythos des Großen Vaterländischen Krieges in Weißrußland.” InMythen der Nationen. 1945 – Arena der Erinnerungen. Katalog zur Ausstellung im Deutschen Historischen Museum Berlin, 737–56. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Distelberger, Teresa , Rudolf de Cillia , and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “Österreichische Identitäten in politischen Gedenkreden des Jubiläumsjahres 2005.” InGedenken im “Gedankenjahr”. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr 2005, edited by Rudolf de Cillia and Ruth Wodak , 29–78. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eke, Steven M. , and Taras Kuzio
    2000 “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies52 (3): 523–47. doi: 10.1080/713663061.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713663061 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman L.
    2005 “Blair’s Contribution to Elaborating a New ‘Doctrine of International Community.’” Journal of Language and Politics4 (1): 41–63. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.1.03fai.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.03fai [Google Scholar]
  14. Flowerdew, John
    2002 “Rhetorical Strategies and Identity Politics in the Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal.” Journal of Language and Politics1 (1): 149–80. doi: 10.1075/jlp.1.1.09flo.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.1.1.09flo [Google Scholar]
  15. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2014 “Historia Magistra Vitae: The Topos of History as a Teacher in Public Struggles over Self- and Other Representation.” InContemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap , 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goujon, Alexandra
    1999 “Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers27 (4): 661–77. doi: 10.1080/009059999108885.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/009059999108885 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2010 “Memorial Narratives of WWII Partisans and Genocide in Belarus.” East European Politics & Societies24 (1): 6–25. doi: 10.1177/0888325409355818.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325409355818 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansen, Imke
    2008 “Die politische Planung der Erinnerung. Geschichtskonstruktion in Belarus zwischen Konflikt und Konsens.” Osteuropa58 (6): 187–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hobsbawm, Eric
    1992 “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” InThe Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger , 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ioffe, Grigory
    2003 “Understanding Belarus: Belarussian Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies55 (8): 1241–72. doi: 10.1080/0966813032000141105.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813032000141105 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2007a “Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity.” East European Politics & Societies21 (2): 348–81. doi: 10.1177/0888325407299790.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325407299790 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2007b “Unfinished Nation-Building in Belarus and the 2006 Presidential Election.” Eurasian Geography and Economics48 (1): 37–58. doi: 10.2747/1538–7216.48.1.37.
    https://doi.org/10.2747/1538–7216.48.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  23. Klymenko, Lina , and Sergiu Gherghina
    2012 “Determinants of Positive Attitudes towards an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Belarus.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review39 (2): 249–69. doi: 10.1163/18763324–03902006.
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18763324–03902006 [Google Scholar]
  24. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Laruelle, Marlène
    2007 “Wiedergeburt per Dekret. Nationsbildung in Zentralasien.” Osteuropa8–9: 139–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leshchenko, Natalia
    2004 “A Fine Instrument: Two Nation-Building Strategies in Post-Soviet Belarus.” Nations and Nationalism10 (3): 333–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1354–5078.2004.00170.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354–5078.2004.00170.x [Google Scholar]
  27. 2008 “The National Ideology and the Basis of the Lukashenka Regime in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies60 (8): 1419–33. doi: 10.1080/09668130802292234
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292234 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindner, Rainer
    1999 “Forum: New Directions in Belarusian Studies. Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus.” Nationalities Papers27 (4): 631–47. doi: 10.1080/009059999108867.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/009059999108867 [Google Scholar]
  29. Linz, Juan José
    2000Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Markwick, Roger
    2012 “The Great Patriotic War in Soviet and Post-Soviet Collective Memory.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, edited by Dan Stone , 692–713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Marples, David
    1999aBelarus: A Denationalized Nation. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1999b “National Awakening and National Consciousness in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers27 (4): 565–78. doi: 10.1080/009059999108830.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/009059999108830 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 “Color Revolutions: The Belarus Case.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies39: 351–64. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2009 “Outpost of Tyranny? The Failure of Democratization in Belarus.” Democratization16 (4): 756–76. doi: 10.1080/13510340903082986.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340903082986 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2012 “History, Memory, and the Second World War in Belarus.” Australian Journal of Politics & History58 (3): 437–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8497.2012.01646.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8497.2012.01646.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Matveeva, Anna
    2009 “Legitimising Central Asian Authoritarianism: Political Manipulation and Symbolic Power.” Europe-Asia Studies61 (7): 1095–1121. doi: 10.1080/09668130903068624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130903068624 [Google Scholar]
  37. Özkırımlı, Umut
    2010Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reisigl, Martin
    2009 “Spoken Silences – Bridging Breaks. The Discursive Construction of Historical Continuities and Turning Points in Austrian Commemorative Speeches by Rhetorical Tropes.” InJustice and Memory Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An International Comparison, edited by Ruth Wodak and Gertraud Auer Borea , 213–40. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2013 “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” InCritical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak , 2:349–73. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A Methodological Framework.” InContemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap , 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Reisigl, Martin , and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 87–121. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rentrop, Petra
    2004 “Arbeiten an der Erinnerung. Geschichte und kollektives Gedächtnis.” Osteuropa54 (2): 146–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Riach, David
    2000 “Nation Building: Identity Politics in Belarus.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism17: 49–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sahm, Astrid
    1999 “Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process.” Nationalities Papers27 (4): 649–60. doi: 10.1080/009059999108876
    https://doi.org/10.1080/009059999108876 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2008 “Im Banne des Krieges: Gedenkstätten und Erinnerungskultur in Belarus.” Osteuropa58 (6): 229–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Shenhav, Shaul
    2005 “Thin and Thick Narrative Analysis. On the Question of Defining and Analyzing Political Narratives.” Narrative Inquiry15 (1): 75–99. doi: 10.1075/ni.15.1.05she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.1.05she [Google Scholar]
  48. Stuckey, Mary E.
    2004Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2005 “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally. Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics4 (1): 65–91. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij [Google Scholar]
  50. Weiss, Gilbert
    2002 “Searching for Europe: The Problem of Legitimisation and Representation in Recent Political Speeches on Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics1 (1): 59–83. doi: 10.1075/jlp.1.1.06wei.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.1.1.06wei [Google Scholar]
  51. Wodak, Ruth
    2013 “Critical Discourse Analysis: Challenges and Perspectives.” InCritical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak , xix–xliii. Los Angeles: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781446286289
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446286289 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wodak, Ruth , Rudolf De Cillia , Martin Reisigl , and Karin Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zlotnikov, Leonid
    2009 “The Belarusian ‘Economic Miracle’ – Illusions and Reality.” InBack from the Cold? The EU and Belarus in 2009, edited by Sabine Fischer , 65–78. Chaillot Paper, No.119. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Belarus , discourse , Discourse Historical Approach , nation-building , political speeches and rhetoric
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error