Volume 16, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Islamic terrorism is arguably the biggest threat that western democracies are now facing. Using Membership Categorisation Analysis as a research methodology and transcripts of the recordings of the negotiations between law enforcement agencies and Mohammed Merah, a self-professed Islamic terrorist, the purpose of this paper is to analyse how an Islamic terrorist accounts for committing terrorist attacks. Taking an ethnomethodological stance, the analyses are rooted in Merah’s own practical reasoning, made visible through his identity work and the way in which he accounts for his actions and renders them intelligible as an act of Islamic terror. Findings indicate that Merah’s identity work points to a dichotomous (us and them) version of a religious and political world order in which an imagined de-territorialised Muslim community (the ummah) is being defended against the aggression of western democracies. Defence of this imagined community justifies global terrorist attacks against the enemies of Islam.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Benedict
    1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andre, Virginie , and Shandon Harris-Hogan
    2013 “Mohamed Merah. From Petty Criminal to Neojihadist.” Politics, Religion and Ideology14(2): 307–319. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2013.792655
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2013.792655 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beyler, Clara
    2006 “The Jihadist Threat in France.” Current Trends in Islamic Ideology3: 89–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bin Laden, Osama
    1998 Jihad against Jews and Christians. AccessedDecember 3, 2016. fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/980223-fatwa.htm.
  5. Clifton, Jonathan
    2009 “A Membership Categorization Analysis of the Waco Siege. Perpetrator-victim Identity as a Moral Discrepancy Device for Doing Subversion.” Sociological Research On-line14(5). Available at: www.socresonline.org.uk/14/5/8.html doi: 10.5153/sro.2002
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2002 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013 “What’s in a Name? Names, National Identity, Assimilation, and the New Racist Discourse of Marine Le Pen.” Pragmatics23(3): 403–420. doi: 10.1075/prag.23.3.02cli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.3.02cli [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooren, François
    2010 “Ventriloquie, Performativité et Communication. Ou Comment Fait-On Parler les Choses. [Ventriloquism, Performativity and Communication. Or How to Make Things Talk].” Reseaux5: 33–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cillia, Rudolf , Martin Reisigl , and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society10(2): 149–173. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Egerton, Frazer
    2010 “Alienation and its discontents.” European Journal of International Relations17(3): 453–474. doi: 10.1177/1354066109350056
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350056 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eglin, Peter , and Stephen Hester
    1999 “‘You’re all a Bunch of Feminists’. Categorisation and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies2(4): 253–272. doi: 10.1023/A:1005444602547
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005444602547 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2003The Montreal Massacre. A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Emerson, Michael
    (ed.) 2009Ethno-Religious Conflict in Europe. Typologies of Radicalization in Europe’s Muslim Communities. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzgerald, Richard , and William Housley
    (Eds.) 2009Media, Policy and Debate. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2009 “Introduction. Media, Policy and Interaction.” InMedia, Policy and Interaction, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald , and William Housley , 1–12. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitzgerald, Richard , William Housley , and Carley Butler
    2009 “Omnirelevance and Interactional Context.” Australian Journal of Communication36(3): 45–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, Steve
    2008 “Ethnomethodolgy.” InThe Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research, ed. by Richard Thorpe , and Robin Holt , 91–93. New York: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, Harold , and Harvey Sacks
    1970 “On Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” InTheoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Development, ed. by John McKinney , and Edward Tiryakian , 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hennessy, Orla
    2012The Phenomenon of Foreign Fighters in Europe. The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT) – The Hague. AccessedDecember 3, 2016. www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-Hennessy-Phenomenon-of-Foreign-Fighters-Europe-July-2012.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hester, Stephen , and Peter Eglin
    1997 “Conclusions: Membership Categorization Analysis and Sociology.” InCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester , and Peter Eglin , 153–163. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoffman, David
    2012 “Review Essay: Twenty Important Journal Articles on Radicalization to, and Deradicalisation from, Terrorism.” Perspectives on Terrorism6/6. Available at: www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/234
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Housley, William , and Richard Fitzgerald
    2001 “Categorisation, Narrative and Devolution in Wales.” Sociological Research Online6(2). Available at: www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/housley.html doi: 10.5153/sro.601
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.601 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2002 “The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorisation Analysis.” Qualitative Research2: 59–83. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2003 “Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview.” Sociological Research Online, 8(2). Available at: www.socresonline.org.uk/8/2/housley.html doi: 10.5153/sro.795
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.795 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015 “Introduction.” InAdvances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald , and William Housley , 1–22. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473917873.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873.n1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984Categorisation and the Moral Order. Boston, etc.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kepel, Gilles
    2006Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. London: IB Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Koshik, Irene
    2005Beyond Rhetorical Questions. Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lentini, Peter
    2010 “If They Know Who Put the Sugar It Means They Know Everything’: Understanding Terrorist Activity Using Operation Pendennis Wiretap (Listening Device and Telephone Intercept) Transcripts. ARC Linkage Project on Radicalisation: 1-35. AccessedDecember 3, 2016. artsonline.monash.edu.au/radicalisation/files/2013/03/conference-2010-know-sugar-know-everything-pl.pdf.
  30. Lepper, Georgia
    2000Categories in Text and Talk: A Practical Introduction to Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208727
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208727 [Google Scholar]
  31. Leudar, Ivan , Victoria Marsland , and Jiri Nekvapil
    2004 “On Membership Categorisation: ‘us’,‘them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society15(2–3): 243–266. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041019
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041019 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mullins, Sam
    2007 “Home Grown Terrorism. Issues and Implications.” Perspectives on Terrorism1(3). www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/12.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pargeter, Alison
    2008The New Frontier of Jihad. Radical Islam in Europe. London: I. B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peters, Rudolph
    1996Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam. A Reader. Princetown, N.J.: Markus Wiener.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies9(2–3): 219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  36. Psathas, George
    1995Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412983792
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983792 [Google Scholar]
  37. Roy, Olivier
    2003 “EuroIslam: the Jihad Within?” The National Interest71: 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow , 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1979 “Hotrodder: A Revolutionary Category.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 7–14. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1986 “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John Gumperz , and Dell Hymes , 325–345. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sageman, Marc
    2006 “The Psychology of Al Qaeda Terrorists.” InMilitary Psychology. Clinical and Operational Applications, ed. by Carrie Kennedy , and Eric Zillman , 281–295. London and New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2007 “A Tutorial on Membership Categorisation.” Journal of Pragmatics39(3): 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Silke, Andrew
    2008 “Holy Warriors: Exploring the Psychological Processes of Jihadi Radicalisation.” European Journal of Criminology5(1): 99–123. doi: 10.1177/1477370807084226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807084226 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stokoe, Elisabeth
    2012 “Moving Forward with Membership Categorisation Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies14: 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
  46. Van De Mieroop, Dorien , and Jonathan Clifton
    2011 “Standardized Relational Pairs in Interviews with Former Slaves. Construction, Negotiation and Alignment.” Narrative Inquiry21(1): 44–67. doi: 10.1075/ni.21.1.03van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21.1.03van [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Dijk, Teun
    1997 “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” Belgian Journal of Linguistics11(1): 11–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Veldhuis, Tinka and Staun, Jorgen
    2009Islamist Radicalization. A Root Cause Model. Clingendael, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error