Volume 16, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The present paper proposes a CADS-based analysis of European Parliament speeches, by merging (C)DA theoretical constructs (inspired by Laclau and Mouffe 1985 ) and CL tools. In this fashion, the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus of Parliamentary Speeches Archive (ECPC) is examined along synchronic and diachronic, quantitative and qualitative lines, in an inductive study that commutes from the micro-text to the macro-context.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baker, Paul
    2006Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2010Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , Majid Khosravinik , Michal Krzyżanowski , Tony McEnery , and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society19 (3): 273–305. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul , and Anthony McEnery
    2005 “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics4 (2): 197–226. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayley, Paul
    ed. 2004Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayley, Paul , Cinzia Bevitori , and Elisabetta Zoni
    2004 “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britain, Germany and Italy.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 185–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.06bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.06bay [Google Scholar]
  7. Bayley, Paul , and Félix San Vicente
    2004 “Ways of Talking about Work in Parliamentary Discourse in Britain and Spain.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 237–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.07bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.07bay [Google Scholar]
  8. Balcerowicz, Leszek , Andrzej Rzonca , Lech Kalina , and Aleksander Łaszek
    2013Economic Growth in the European Union. Brussels: The Lisbon Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bevitori, Cinzia
    2004 “Negotiating Conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 87–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.03bev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.03bev [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, Douglas , Conrad, Susan , and Reppen, Randi
    1998Corpus Linguistics : Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad , and Edward Finegan
    1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chilton, Paul
    ed. 2002Journal of Language and Politics, 2:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. “Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union” 2008 OJ C115/13.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Constantinescu, Andrei , and Liliana-Aurora Constantinescu
    2013 “The Global Crisis Financial and Economic Crisis and the Main Priorities of the European Union for 2020.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov6(55).1: 171–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Copeland, Paul , and Scott James
    2011 “From Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020: The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Governance and Discourse of Economic Reform.” UACES 41st Annual Conference: 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dibattista, Denise
    2004 “Legitimising and Informative Discourse in the Kosovo Debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 151–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.05dib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.05dib [Google Scholar]
  17. European Commission
    European Commission 2005 Commission Work Programme for 2005. eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0015:FIN:EN:PDF. AccessedSeptember 8, 2015.
  18. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2015 “European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.” www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_ATA(2015)549016. AccessedSeptember 8, 2015.
  19. Eurostat
    Eurostat 2005Eurostat Yearbook 2005. ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-CD-05-001. AccessedSeptember 8, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Garzone, Giuliana , and Francesca Santulli
    2004 “What Can Corpus Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” InCorpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington , John Morley , and Louann Haarman , 351–68. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, Michael
    2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203327630
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327630 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ilie, Cornelia
    2010European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38 [Google Scholar]
  23. Koller, Veronika , and Gerlinde Mautner
    2004 “Computer Applications in Critical Discourse Analysis.” InApplying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin , Ann Hewings , and Kieran O’Halloran , 216–28. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kopaczyk, Joanna
    2012 “Applications of the Lexical Bundles Method in Historical Corpus Research.” InCorpus Data across Languages and Disciplines, ed. by Piotr Cap , 83–95. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kotz, David M.
    “The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism.” Review of Radical Political Economics41.3 (2009): 305–317. doi: 10.1177/0486613409335093
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093 [Google Scholar]
  26. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal
    1985/2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mehan, Hugh
    1997 “The Discourse of the Illegal Immigration Debate: A Case Study in the Politics of Representation.” Discourse and Society8 (2): 249–70. doi: 10.1177/0957926597008002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002006 [Google Scholar]
  28. Montesano Montessori, Nicolina
    2014 “The Potential of Narrative Strategies in the Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Positions and Social Change.” InFrom Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis across Disciplines, ed. by Bertie Kaal , 171–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.55.08mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.08mon [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Halloran, Kieran , and Caroline Coffin
    2004 “Checking Overinterpretation and Underinterpretation: Help from Corpora in Critical Linguistics.” InApplying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin , Ann Hewings , and Kieran O’Halloran , 257–97. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Orpin, Debora
    2005 “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10: 1: 37–61. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp [Google Scholar]
  31. Partington, Alan
    ed. 2013Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stubbs, Michael
    1996Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford, Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Svartvik, Jan
    2007 “Corpus Linguistics 25+ Year On.” InCorpus Linguistics 25 Years On, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti , 11–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401204347_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204347_003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2000 “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” InThe Semiotics of Racism. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak , 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner , 203–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010Discourse and Context A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vasta, Nicoleta
    2004 “Consent and Dissent in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates on the 1998 Gulf Crisis.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 111–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.04vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.04vas [Google Scholar]
  38. Wodak, Ruth , and Teun A. van Dijk
    (eds.) 2000Racism at the Top Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS); ECPC; European Parliament
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error