1887
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution grants citizenship to every child born on US soil. While most Americans think this 150 year old formulation is permanent, it is actually open to change. We explore the legal debate over the current formulation of US citizenship. Using the research design of the exemplar case study, we undertake a conceptual metaphor-based critical discourse analysis of three contending contemporary legal stances regarding US citizenship. In the light of four current court cases, some legal theorists argue that the formulation is both undemocratic and inadequate, and should be amended to address 21st century national concerns. Others argue to retain the current formulation in spite of these concerns. Our study reveals that the rival stances are argued in terms of irreconcilable conceptual metaphors, and each legal stance in itself is deficient to address these current concerns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15038.san
2017-03-21
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah
    1958The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barderrama, Francisco E. , and Raymond Rodríguez
    2006Decade of Betrayal: Mexican Repartriation in the 1930s. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunningham-Parmeter, Keith
    2011 “Alien language: Immigration metaphors and the jurispru-dence of Otherness.” Fordham Law Review79: 1545–1590.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Epstein, Lee , and Andrew Martin
    2012 “Legal scholarship highlight: Activism and the Roberts Court.” SCOTUSblog, www.scotusblog.com/2012/11 (accessed28 June 2015)
  5. Gardner, Martin
    1996The night is large: Collected essays, 1938–1995. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs, Raymond Jr.
    1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 “Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action.” InThe Power of Metaphor: Examining its influence on Social Life, ed. by Mark J. Landau , Michael D. Robinson , and Brian P. Meier , 17–40. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Graglia, Lino A.
    2009 “Birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens: An irrational public policy.” Texas Review of Law & Politics14: 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hacker, J. David
    2011 “A census-based count of the Civil War dead.” Civil War History57: 307–48. doi: 10.1353/cwh.2011.0061
    https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2011.0061 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ing, Matthew
    2011 “Birthright citizenship, illegal aliens, and the original meaning of the Citizenship Clause.” Akron Law Review45: 719–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kerber, Linda A.
    1992 “The paradox of women’s citizenship in the early Republic: The case of Martin vs. Massachusetts, 1805.” The American Historical Review97: 349–78. doi: 10.2307/2165723
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2165723 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, Victoria , and Frank Shyong
    . 3March 2015 “‘Maternity tourism’ raids target California operations catering to Chinese.” Los Angeles Times, A1.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krause, Monika
    2008 “Undocumented migrants: An Arendtian perspective.” European Journal of Political Theory7: 331–48. doi: 10.1177/1474885108089175
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885108089175 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Landau, Mark , Michael Robinson , and Brian Meier
    (eds) 2013The Power of Metaphor: Examining its Influence on Social Life. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mechaca, Martha
    1993 “Chicano Indianism: A historical account of racial repression in the United States.” American Ethnologist20: 583–603. doi: 10.1525/ae.1993.20.3.02a00070
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1993.20.3.02a00070 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ngai, Mae M.
    2007 “Birthright citizenship and the alien citizen.” Fordham Law Review75: 2521–2530.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400850235
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850235 [Google Scholar]
  19. Olivas, Michael A.
    2011 “The political efficacy of Plyler v. Doe: The danger and the discourse.” UC Davis Law Review45: 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Passel, Jeffrey S. , and Mark H. Lopez
    2012 “Up to 1.7 million unauthorized immigrant youth may benefit from new deportation rules.” Pew Research Center. Washington, DC: Pew Research.
  21. Perrez, Julien and Min Reuchamps
    2015The political impact of metaphors, special issue ofMetaphor and the Social World5(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group 2007 “MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol22(1): 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sageman, Marc
    2004Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812206791
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812206791 [Google Scholar]
  24. Santa Ana, Otto , Layza López , and Edgar Munguía
    2010 “Framing peace as violence: U.S. television news depictions of the 2007 Los Angeles police attack on immigrant rights marchers.” Aztlán35(1): 69–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Santa Ana, Otto , Sandra L. Treviño , Michael Bailey , Kristen Bodossian , and Antonio de Necochea
    2007 “A May to Remember: Adversarial images of immigrants in U.S. newspapers during the 2006 policy debate.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race4(1): 207–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schuck, Peter H. , and Rogers M. Smith
    1985Citizenship without Consent: Illegal Aliens in the American Polity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Searle, John R.
    1992The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sengupta, Somini and Hwaida Saad
    . 5November 2015 “As Refugees Flee, Thousands of Children Have No Country to Call Their Own.” New York Times. (retrieved5 November 2015fromwww.nytimes.com/2015/11/06/world/europe/as-refugees-flee-thousands-of-children-have-no-country-to-call-their-own.html?_r=0)
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Steen, Gerald J. , Aletta G. Dorst , J. Berenike Herrmann , Anna Kaal , Tina Krennmayr , and Trijntje Pasma
    2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsai, Robert
    2008Eloquence & Reason: Creating a First Amendment Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. doi: 10.12987/yale/9780300117233.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300117233.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division 2013 The number of international migrants worldwide reaches 232 million. Population Facts. www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/popfacts/PopFacts_2013-2_new.pdf (accessed on28June 2015).
  32. Valencia, Richard R.
    2008Chicano students and the Courts: The Mexican American Legal Struggle for Educational Equality. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Besien, Fred
    1989 “Metaphors in scientific language.” Communication & Cognition22: 5–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Winter, Steven L.
    1988 “The metaphor of ‘standing’ and the problem of self-governance.” Stanford University Law Review40: 1371–1516. doi: 10.2307/1228780
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1228780 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1989 “Transcendental nonsense, metaphoric reasoning, and the cognitive strikes law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review137: 1105–1237. doi: 10.2307/3312131
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3312131 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1990 “Bull Durham and the uses of theory.” Stanford University Law Review42: 639–93. doi: 10.2307/1228888
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1228888 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wodak, Ruth
    2002a “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 1–13. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2002b “The discourse-historical approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 63–94. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zong, Jie , and Jeanne Batalova
    2016 14April. “Frequently requested statistics on immigrant and immigration in the United States.” Migration Policy Institute On-line Journal. USA: Migration Policy Institute. (retrieved24 April 2016fromwww.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15038.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.15038.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): citizenship , conceptual metaphor , critical discourse analysis and legal discourse
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error