1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Conversation analysis (CA) and ethnomethodology (EM) have long dealt with political talk, but this is the first thematic volume showing the continuity and diversity of EMCA studies in this field. This introduction provides an overview of early to recent EMCA contributions to the study of political talk and discusses how they developed a distinctive field of investigation and how the papers of the special issue draw on and contribute to it. The introduction also clarifies how specific sequential and categorial organizations of social interaction manifest and foster political action and participation, and are locally treated as of political importance by the participants themselves. The study of micro-politics of sequentiality focuses on the temporal, emergent, and sequential unfolding of interaction and the way its organization opens/closes possible occasions for politically relevant actions. By showing how these are established, responded and oriented to by the participants, it offers a respecification of political issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee
2017-04-25
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, John M.
    1984a “Public Speaking and Audience Responses: Some Techniques for Inviting Applause.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage , 370–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1984bOur Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1985 “Refusing Invited Applause: Preliminary Observations from a Case Study of Charismatic Oratory.” Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk , 161–181. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barthélémy, Michel
    1992 “Événement et espace public: L’affaire Carpentras [Event and public space: the Carpentras case].” Quaderni18 (1): 125–140. doi: 10.3406/quad.1992.975
    https://doi.org/10.3406/quad.1992.975 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackledge, Adrian
    2005Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bovet, Alain
    2006 “La constitution du public dans la démocratie semi-directe. Le cas de l’initiative populaire ‘pour une procréation respectant la dignité humaine’ [The constitution of the public in a semi-direct democracy. The case of the popular initiative ‘for a procreation respecting human dignity].” Mots81: 35–48. doi: 10.4000/mots.650
    https://doi.org/10.4000/mots.650 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007Analyse des pratiques médiatiques de mise en forme et de mise en oeuvre du débat public [Analysis of media practices formatting and achieving public debate]. PhD doctoral thesis, Faculté des Sciences économiques et sociales de l’Université de Fribourg, Université de Fribourg.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bovet, Alain , and Marc Relieu
    2014 “Assembling the Collective Experience of a Serious Game Mediation as an Interactional Practice.” Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8512: 571–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cap, Piotr
    2006Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clayman, Steven E.
    1988 “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems35 (4): 474–492. doi: 10.2307/800598
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800598 [Google Scholar]
  11. 1989 “The Production of Punctuality: Social Interaction, Temporal Organization, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology95 (3): 659–691. doi: 10.1086/229329
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229329 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1991 “News Interview Openings: Aspects of Sequential Organization.” In Broadcast Talk: A Reader, ed. by Paddy Sannell , 48–75. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1993 “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review58 (1): 110–130. doi: 10.2307/2096221
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2096221 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2002 “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media Culture & Society24 (2): 191–210. doi: 10.1177/016344370202400203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400203 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2010 “Questioning in Broadcast Journalism.” In ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed and Susan Ehrlich . 256–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 “Conversation Analysis in the News Interview.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 630–656. West-Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118325001.ch31
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch31 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clayman, Steven E. , Marc N. Elliott , John Heritage , and Megan Beckett
    2010 “A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential News.” Political Communication27 (3): 229–247. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.496712
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.496712 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clayman, Steven E. , Marc N. Elliott , John Heritage , and Laurie McDonald
    2006 “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly36 (4): 561–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1741‑5705.2006.02568.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Clayman, Steven E. , John Heritage , Marc N. Elliott , and Laurie McDonald
    2007 “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review72 (1): 23–41. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102 [Google Scholar]
  20. Clayman, Steven E. , and Matthew P. Fox
    . this issue. “Hardballs and Softballs: Modulating Adversarialness in Journalistic Questioning.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 20–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Clayman, Steven E. , and John Heritage
    2002aThe News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002b “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication52:749–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Drew, Paul , and John Heritage
    (eds) 1992Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dupret, Baudouin , Jiri Nekvapil , and Ivan Leudar
    (eds) 2007Media, Wars and Identities – Part One. Vol. 9, Ethnographic Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Eglin, Peter , and Stephen Hester
    1999 ““You’re All a Bunch of Feminists”: Categorization and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies22: 253–272. doi: 10.1023/A:1005444602547
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005444602547 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ekström, Mats , and Marianna Patrona
    (eds) 2011Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.42 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2000New Labour. New Language. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fitzgerald, Richard , and William Housley
    2002 “Identity, Categorization and Sequential Organization: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse & Society13 (5):679–602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  30. (eds) 2009Media, Policy and Interaction. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 “Introduction to Membership Categorisation Analysis.” In Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley , 1–21. Los Angeles: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781473917873
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fitzgerald, Richard , and Joanna Thornborrow
    . this issue. “‘I’m a Scouser’: Membership Categories and Political Geography in the 2015 UK Election Call Phone-in.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 41–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Geden, Oliver
    2007Diskursstrategien im Rechtspopulismus [Discursive strategies of right wing populism]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Greatbatch, David
    1986 “Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by Interviewees.” Media Culture & Society8 (4): 441–455. doi: 10.1177/0163443786008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1988 “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society17 (3): 401–430. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963 [Google Scholar]
  36. Heritage, John
    1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk , 95–117. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2002 “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (10–11): 1427–1446. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heritage, John , and Steven E. Clayman
    2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Heritage, John , and David Greatbatch
    1986 “Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences.” American Journal of Sociology92 (1): 110–157. doi: 10.1086/228465
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228465 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1991 “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deirdri Boden and Don H. Zimmerman . 93–173. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hodges, Adam , and Chad Nilep
    2007Discourse, War and Terrorism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hutchby, Ian
    1996Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Keel, Sara
    . this issue. “The Interactive Achievement and Transformation of a “Revolutionary Category” – Sans-Papiers – During Public Press Conferences.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 60–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union, Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Llewellyn, Nick
    2005 “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology39 (4): 697–716. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056028
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056028 [Google Scholar]
  47. Llewellyn, Nick , and Carly W. Butler
    2011 “Walking Out on Air.” Research on Language and Social Interaction44 (1): 44–64. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2011.544128
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.544128 [Google Scholar]
  48. McIlvenny, Paul
    1996a “Popular Public Discourse at Speakers’ Corner: Negotiating Cultural Identities in Interaction.” Discourse & Society7 (1): 7–37. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007001002 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1996b “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society25: 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S004740450002042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
  50. . this issue. “Mobilising the Micro-Political Voice: Doing the ‘Human Microphone’ and the ‘Mic-Check’.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 112–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mole, Richard C.M.
    (ed) 2007Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230591301
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591301 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005 “BEcomING COLLECTIVE: The constitution of the audience as an interactional process.” In Makings Things Public. Athmospheres of Democracy, ed. by Bruno Latour , and Peter Weibel , 876–883. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics21 (2): 289–316. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.548650
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.548650 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics46 (1): 39–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2015 The facilitator’s task of formulating citizens’ proposals in political meetings: Orchestrating multiple embodied orientations to recipients. 16: 1–62. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2015/ga-mondada.pdf
  56. 2017 “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Language Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig , Peter Mühlhäusler and Steve Pagel , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Mondada, Lorenza , Hanna Svensson , and Nynke Van Schepen
    . this issue. “A Table-Based Turn-Taking System and its Political Consequences: Managing Participation, Building Opinion Groups, and Fostering Consensus.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 85–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Reisigl, Martin , and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Richardson, John
    2004 (Mis)representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9
  60. Rojo, Luisa M.
    2014 “The Spatial Dynamics of Discourse in Global Protest Movements.” Journal of Language and Politics13 (4): 583–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell H. Hymes . 325–345. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John Lee , 54–69. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1992Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson . Vol. I + II. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1987 “Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey Alexander , Bernhard Giesen , Richard Munch , and Neil J. Smelser , 207–234. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1988/1989 “From Interview to Confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather Encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction22: 215–240. doi: 10.1080/08351818809389304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389304 [Google Scholar]
  66. 1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in which Numbers Are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Studies in Social Organisation and Embodied Activitiesed. by Paul ten Have and George Psathas , 31–42. Washington D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  68. Thornborrow, Joanna
    2002Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2008Discourse & Power. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07299‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3 [Google Scholar]
  70. Watson, Patrick , and Christian Greiffenhagen
    2009 “Press Scrums: Some Preliminary Observations.” In Media, Policy and Interaction, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley , 115–135. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Watson, Rod
    1997 “Some General Reflections on Categorization and Sequence in the Analysis of Conversation.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin , 49–76. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 2015 “De-Refying Categories.” In Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley , 23–49. Los Angeles: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781473917873.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873.n2 [Google Scholar]
  73. Widmer, Jean
    2010Discours et cognition sociale [Discourse and social cognition]. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wodak, Ruth
    2009The Discourse of Politics in Action. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230316539
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wodak, Ruth , and Teun A. Van Dijk
    (eds) 2000Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): categorization , conversation analysis , institutional talk , political interactions and sequentiality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error