Hardballs and softballs

References

1. Bolden, Galina , Jenny Mandelbaum , and Sue Wilkinson
   2012 “Pursuing a Response By Repairing an Indexical Reference.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(2): 137–155. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.673380
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.673380 [Google Scholar]
2. Clayman, Steven E.
   1988 “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems35(4): 474–492. doi: 10.2307/800598
   https://doi.org/10.2307/800598 [Google Scholar]
3. Clayman, Steven E.
   1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew , and John Heritage , 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Clayman, Steven E.
   2002 “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media, Culture, and Society24: 191–210. doi: 10.1177/016344370202400203
   https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400203 [Google Scholar]
5. Clayman, Steven E. , and John Heritage
   2002a The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures On the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, Steven E. , and John Heritage
   2002b “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication52(4): 749–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
7. Clayman, Steven E. , Marc N. Elliott , John Heritage , and Laurie McDonald
   2006 “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly36: 561–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1741‑5705.2006.02568.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x [Google Scholar]
8. Clayman, Steven E. , John Heritage , Marc N. Elliott , and Laurie McDonald
   2007 “When Does the Watchdog Bark?: Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review72: 23–41. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200102
   https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102 [Google Scholar]
9. Clayman, Steven E. , Marc Elliott , John Heritage , and Megan Beckett
   2010 “A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential News.” Political Communication27: 229–247. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.496712
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.496712 [Google Scholar]
10. Conza, Angiola Di , Augusto Gnisci , and Angelo Caputo
    2011 “Interviewers Use of Coercive Questioning During a Midterm Period Favorable to the Opposition Party.” In Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces, ed. by A. Esposito , 147–154. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑18184‑9_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_13 [Google Scholar]
11. Ekström Mats
    2011 “Hybridity as a Resource and Challenge in a Talk Show Political Interview.” In Talking Politics in Broadcast Media, ed. by Mats Ekström , and Marianna Patrona , 135–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.42.12eks
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.42.12eks [Google Scholar]
12. Ekström, Mats , Göran Eriksson , Bengt Johansson , and Patrik Wikström
    2012 “Biased Interrogations? A Multi-Methodological Approach on Bias in Election Campaign Interviews.” Journalism Studies14(3): 423–439. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.689488
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.689488 [Google Scholar]
13. Eriksson, Göran
    2011a “Adversarial Moments: A Study of Short-Form Interviews in the News.” Journalism12(1): 51–69. doi: 10.1177/1464884910367588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367588 [Google Scholar]
14. Eriksson, Göran
    2011b “Follow-Up Questions in Political Press Conferences.” Journal of Pragmatics43(14): 3331–3344. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.004 [Google Scholar]
15. Eriksson, Göran , and Johan Östman
    2013 “Cooperative or Adversarial? Journalists’ Enactment of the Watchdog Function in Political News Production.” International Journal of Press/Politics18(3): 304–324. doi: 10.1177/1940161213482493
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213482493 [Google Scholar]
16. Ford, Cecilia , Barbara Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson
    2002 “Constituency and Turn Increments.” In The Language of Turns and Sequences, ed. by Cecilia Ford , Barbara Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson , 14–38. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    2002 “Ad Hoc Inquiries: Two Preferences in the Design of Routine Questions in an Open Context.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, ed. by Douglas W. Maynard , Hanneke Houtkoop , Nora C. Schaeffer , and Johannes van der Zouwen , 313–334. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John
    2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 30–52. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John , Jeffrey Robinson , Marc Elliott , Megan Beckett , and Michael Wilkes
    2007 “Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: The Difference one Word Can Make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine22(10): 1429–1433. doi: 10.1007/s11606‑007‑0279‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John and Andrew Roth
    1995 “Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview.” Research on Language and Social Interaction28(1): 1–60. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1 [Google Scholar]
21. Huls, Erica and Jasper Varwijk
    2011 “Political Bias in TV Interviews.” Discourse and Society22(1): 48–65. doi: 10.1177/0957926510382836
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382836 [Google Scholar]
22. Hutchby, Ian
    2011 “Non-Neutrality and Argument in the Hybrid Political Interview,” Discourse Studies13(3): 349–367. doi: 10.1177/1461445611400665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400665 [Google Scholar]
23. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
24. Kampf, Zahar , and Efrat Daskal
    2011 “When the Watchdog Bites: Insulting Politicians On Air.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Mats Ekström and Marianna Patrona , 177–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.42.14kam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.42.14kam [Google Scholar]
25. Krippendorff, Klaus
    1980 Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Montgomery, Martin
    2007 The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rendle-Short, Johanna
    2007 “Neutralism and Adversarial Challenges in the Political News Interview.” Discourse and Communication1(4): 387–406. doi: 10.1177/1750481307082205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307082205 [Google Scholar]
28. Romaniuk, Tanya
    2013a “Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn , and Elizabeth Holt , 201–220. London, England: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Romaniuk, Tanya
    2013b “Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction46(2): 144–164. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2013.780339
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.780339 [Google Scholar]
30. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
31. Schudson, Michael
    2008 Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tolson, Andrew
    2012 “You’ll Need a Miracle to Win this Election.” ( J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer Assertiveness in UK General Elections 1983–2010.” Discourse, Context, and Media1: 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
33. Walker, Gareth
    2004 “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , and Cecilia E. Ford , 147–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62.10wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.10wal [Google Scholar]