1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Despite the emergence of newer forms of web-based political engagement, radio phone-ins continue to have a significant role in the enactment of the democratic process, providing a live forum for direct encounters between members of the public and politicians, beyond the professional forms of mediated encounters between studio journalists and politicians. In this paper, drawing on data from the BBC’s 2015 phone-in , we use Membership Categorisation Analysis to examine the ways in which political engagement is configured within this forum in the run up to the UK General Election in 2015. In particular, we examine how callers and politicians engage in live political debate through transforming personal experiences into politicised social categories. What emerges most significantly here is that, whereas in previous series participants configured political categories through personal social identities, in 2015 there is a particular emphasis on callers’ geographical locations as political categories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit
2017-04-25
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Coleman, Stephen
    2002 “Election Call 2001: How Politicians and the Public Interacted.” Parliamentary Affairs55: 731–742. doi: 10.1093/parlij/55.4.731
    https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.4.731 [Google Scholar]
  2. Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
    2012a “‘With Whom do I have the Pleasure?’: Callers’ Categories in Political Talk Radio Programs.” Journal of Pragmatics, 44(3): 280–297. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2012b “Types of Interaction on Israeli Political Radio Phone-in Programmes and their Relations to the Public Sphere.” Javnost-The Public19(3): 21–39. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2012.11009089
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2012.11009089 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ekström, Mats , and Ulla Moberg
    2015 “‘Welcome to Participate!’: Host Activities and Caller’s Position in Swedish Election Campaign Phone-ins in the 1970s and the 2000s.” Journalism16(5): 654–671. doi: 10.1177/1464884914536841
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914536841 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fitzgerald, Richard
    2007 “An Initial Investigation into the Role of Talkback in Hong Kong and Singapore.” Media International Australia124: 87–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitzgerald, Richard , and William Housley
    2002 “Identity, Categorisation and Sequential Organisation: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse and Society13(5): 579–602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007 “Talkback Community and the Public Sphere.” Media International Australia122: 150–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (eds) 2015Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473917873
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Habermas, Jürgen
    1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA..
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hester, Stephen , and Peter Eglin
    (eds) 1997Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Boston, MA: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hofstetter, Richard C.
    1998 “Political Talk Radio, Situational Involvement, and Political Mobilization.” Social Science Quarterly79(2): 273–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Housley, William , and Richard Fitzgerald
    2002 “A Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorisation Analysis.” Qualitative Research2(1): 59–84. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchby, Ian
    1996Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2001 ‘“Witnessing’: The Use of First-Hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio.” Discourse Studies3 (4): 481–497. doi: 10.1177/1461445601003004009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaworski, Adam , and Richard Fitzgerald
    2008 “‘This Poll has not Happened Yet’: Temporal Play in Election Predictions.” Discourse & Communication, 2 (1): 5–27. doi: 10.1177/1750481307085574
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307085574 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner . 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  18. Kilby, Laura , and Ava. D. Horowitz
    2013 “Opening up Terrorism Talk: The Sequential and Categorical Production of Discursive Power within the Call Openings of a Talk Radio Broadcast.” Discourse & Society24 (6): 725–742. doi: 10.1177/0957926513503270
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513503270 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Francis L. F.
    2007 “Talk Radio Listening, Opinion Expression and Political Discussion in a Democratizing Society.” Asian Journal of Communication17(1): 78–96. doi: 10.1080/01292980601114588
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980601114588 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lunt, Peter , and Sonia Livingstone
    2013 “Media Studies’ Fascination with the Concept of the Public Sphere: Critical Reflections and Emerging Debates.” Media, Culture and Society35(1): 87–96. doi: 10.1177/0163443712464562
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712464562 [Google Scholar]
  21. McNair, Brian , Mathew Hibberd , and Philip Schlesinger
    2002 “Public Access Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics.” Journalism Studies3 (3): 407–422. doi: 10.1080/14616700220145623
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700220145623 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ross, Karen
    2004 “Political Talk Radio and Democratic Participation: Caller Perspectives on Election Call.” Media, Culture and Society26 (6): 785–801. doi: 10.1177/0163443704045509
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704045509 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “On the Analysability of Stories by Children”. In Ethnomethodology, ed. by Roy Turner , 216–32. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995Lectures on ConversationVol.I and II, ed. by Gail Jefferson . Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  25. Stremlau, Nicole , Emanuele Fantini and Iginio Gagliardone
    2015 “Patronage, Politics and Performance: Radio Call-in Programs and the Myth of Accountability.” Third World Quarterly36 (8): 1510–1526. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1048797
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1048797 [Google Scholar]
  26. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 “Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies14 (3): 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
  27. Thornborrow, Joanna
    2001 “Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasting.” Discourse Studies3 (4): 459–479. doi: 10.1177/1461445601003004008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004008 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2002Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015The Discourse of Public Participation Media. From Talk Show to Twitter. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thornborrow, Joanna , and Richard Fitzgerald
    2002 “From Problematic Object to Routine ‘Add-On’: Dealing with E-mails in Radio Phone-ins.” Discourse Studies4 (2): 201–224. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040020501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020501 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2013 “‘Grab a Pen and Paper’: Interaction v. Interactivity in a Political Radio Phone-in.” Journal of Language and Politics12 (1): 1–28. doi: 10.1075/jlp.12.1.01tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.1.01tho [Google Scholar]
  32. Turner, Graeme
    2009 “Politics, Radio and Journalism in Australia The Influence of ‘Talkback’;.” Journalism10 (4): 411–430. doi: 10.1177/1464884909104948
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909104948 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error