A table-based turn-taking system and its political consequences

References

1. Amerine, Ronald , and Jack Bilmes
   1988 “Following Instructions.” Human Studies11: 327–339. doi: 10.1007/BF00177308
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177308 [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, John M.
   1984 Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Drew, Paul
   1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew , and John Heritage , 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Garfinkel, Harold
   2002 Ethnomethodology’s Program. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goffman, Erving
   1971 Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Heritage, John , and Steven E. Clayman
   2010 Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jefferson, Gail
   2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner . 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
8. Llewellyn, Nick
   2005 “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology39: 697–716. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056028
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056028 [Google Scholar]
9. McIlvenny, Paul
   1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society25: 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S004740450002042X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
10. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005 “BEcomING COLLECTIVE: The Constitution of the Audience as an Interactional Process.” In Makings Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. by Bruno Latour , and Peter Weibel , 876–883. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics46: 39–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
12. Mondada, Lorenza
    2015 “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” 16: 1–62. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de
13. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Materials for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow , 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in Which Numbers are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Situated Order, ed. by Paul ten Have , and George Psathas , 31–42. Washington: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]