1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Turn-taking in political settings faces the problem of how to enable the participation of larger numbers of speakers in orderly ways; solutions have been described as offered by constrained formats like the or the . This paper describes another specific solution, a

The study describes how facilitators managing brainstorming sessions in a participatory project exploit the spatial distribution of the citizens around tables scattered in the meeting room. By organizing discussions table by table, rather than selecting next individual speakers, the facilitators select groups and attributes specific rights and obligations to talk to “tables”, which are then treated not as a mere spatial location but as a political entity. The table-based device does not just solve problems of turn-taking management but also fosters the expression of collective opinions of the “table” as a place for building consensus.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.05mon
2017-04-25
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amerine, Ronald , and Jack Bilmes
    1988 “Following Instructions.” Human Studies11: 327–339. doi: 10.1007/BF00177308
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177308 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, John M.
    1984Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Drew, Paul
    1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew , and John Heritage , 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Garfinkel, Harold
    2002Ethnomethodology’s Program. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goffman, Erving
    1971Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heritage, John , and Steven E. Clayman
    2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner . 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  8. Llewellyn, Nick
    2005 “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology39: 697–716. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056028
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056028 [Google Scholar]
  9. McIlvenny, Paul
    1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society25: 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S004740450002042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
  10. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005 “BEcomING COLLECTIVE: The Constitution of the Audience as an Interactional Process.” In Makings Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. by Bruno Latour , and Peter Weibel , 876–883. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics46: 39–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2015 “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” 16: 1–62. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de
  13. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Materials for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow , 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in Which Numbers are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Situated Order, ed. by Paul ten Have , and George Psathas , 31–42. Washington: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.05mon
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conversation analysis , grassroots democracy , meeting , participation , space and turn-taking
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error