1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

A notable feature of the participatory communication repertoire developed by the Occupy movement is known as the “Human Microphone” or “People’s Mic”, reminiscent of the call-and-response format of action. A collection was made of more than 160 online amateur videos recorded at an Occupy protest site or event in which the Human Mic and the disaffiliative “mic check” were used in diverse ways. In 19 separate cases, more than one video recording was independently uploaded of the same event, thus giving a unique insight into the constitution of participation in a collective (and yet potentially dissensual) politico-interactional space from disparate technology-mediated spatial positions at the site. Ethnomethodological conversation analysis (EMCA) is used to analyse the social interactional accomplishment and collective organisation of the ‘voice’ of the Human Mic, including its propagation to larger audiences and its interdiscursive translation into new settings as a strategic tool of political communication that attempts to ‘occupy’ institutional speech.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
2017-04-25
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, John M.
    1984Our Master’s Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayman, Steven E.
    1993 “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review58: 110–130. doi: 10.2307/2096221
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2096221 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clayman, Steven E. , and John Heritage
    2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooren, François
    2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fairclough, Norman
    1996 “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard , and Malcolm Coulthard , 71–83. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, Nikki , and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 “‘The Camera Rolls’: Using Third-Party Video in Field Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science642 (1): 109–123. doi: 10.1177/0002716212438205.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212438205 [Google Scholar]
  8. Laurier, Eric
    2015 “YouTube: Fragments of a Video-Tropic Atlas.” Area48(8): 488–495. doi: 10.1111/area.12157.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12157 [Google Scholar]
  9. Llewellyn, Nick
    2005 “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology39 (4): 697–716. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056028
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056028 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lomax, Helen , and Neil Casey
    1998 “Recording Social Life: Reflexivity and Video Methodology.” Sociological Research Online3 (2). www.socresonline.org.uk/3/2/1.html [Date accessed: 17 May 2010]. doi: 10.5153/sro.1372
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1372 [Google Scholar]
  11. Maeckelbergh, Marianne
    2011 “Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement.” Social Movement Studies10 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2011.545223
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545223 [Google Scholar]
  12. McIlvenny, Paul
    1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society25: 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S004740450002042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
  13. Nardone, Michael
    2012 Repetition and Difference: On the Human Microphone as Interventionist Form. Available online: thehumanmicrophone.blogspot.ca/2012/04/repetition-and-difference-on-human_25.html [Date accessed: 25 April 2015].
  14. Reynolds, Edward J.
    2013Enticing a Challengeable: Instituting Social Order as a Practice of Public Conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Journalism and Communication: The University of Queensland.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Steinberg, Rebecca L.
    2014 “The Occupy Assembly: Discursive Experiments in Direct Democracy.” Journal of Language and Politics13 (4): 702–731. doi: 10.1075/jlp.13.4.06ste.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.06ste [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error