Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper focuses on what is referred to as the SkillsFuture initiative as the most current crystallization of the Singapore government’s lifelong learning policy, and the state-sponsored discourse associated with it. Adopting a critical discourse-analytic approach, the study examines a data set that cuts across various genres and media (i.e. political speeches, Internet website, video clips), covering both linguistic and (moving) visual instantiations, involving semiotic features like pronouns, modality, image design parameters, and importantly, metaphor. The paper seeks to provide insight into the ideological foundations of Singapore’s education-labour policies as an indication of the ideal(ized) Singaporean citizen-subject promulgated by the state, and how these are semiotically instantiated in state-sponsored discourse. In so doing, the analysis also considers the contextual specificity of the neoliberal-oriented values purveyed, as the individualizing tropes of neoliberalism discursively interact with what might be considered a post-Confucian Singaporean communitarian/collective ethos.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Birch, Kean , and Vlad Mykhnenko
    2010 “Introduction: A world Turned Right way up.” InThe Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism: The Collapse of an Economic Order?, ed. by Kean Birch , and Vlad Mykhnenko , 1–20. London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bound, Helen , and Peter Rushbrook
    2015 “Problematising Workplace Learning.” InTowards a New Understanding of Workplace Learning: The Context of Singapore, ed. by Bound, Helen , and Peter Rushbrook , 1–16. Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Roger
    2011 “The March of the Market.” InThe Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, ed. by Mike Molesworth , Richard Scullion , and Elizabeth Nixon , 11–24. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Wendy
    2003 “Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory & Event7(1). Available at: www.muse.jhu.edu/article/48659 (AccessedApril 2017). doi: 10.1353/tae.2003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chua, Beng Huat
    1995Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Delors, Jacques
    1996Learning: The Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eriksen, Thomas Hylland
    2001Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology, 2nd edn.London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, Norman
    2001Language and Power, 2nd edn.London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2002 “Language in New Capitalism.” Discourse & Society13(2): 163–166. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013002404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002404 [Google Scholar]
  10. Felton, George
    2013Advertising Concept and Copy, 3rd edn.London: WW Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Foskett, Nick
    2011 “Markets, Government, Funding and the Marketisation of UK Higher Education.” InThe Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, ed. by Mike Molesworth , Richard Scullion , and Elizabeth Nixon , 25–38. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, Michel
    2008The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230594180
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gary, Stanley Becker
    2002 “The Age of Human Capital.” InEducation in the Twenty-first Century, ed. by Edward P. Lazear , 3–8. Palo Alto: Hoover Insitution Press
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gershon, Ilana
    2011 “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology52(4): 537–555. doi: 10.1086/660866
    https://doi.org/10.1086/660866 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goatly, Andrew
    2002 “Conflicting Metaphors in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Educational Reform Proposals.” Metaphor and Symbol17(4): 263–294. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1704_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1704_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goh, Chok Tong
    1997 Speech by Prime Minister at the Opening of the 7th International Conference for Thinking, 2June. Available at: www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm (accessedMarch 2016).
  18. Gordon, Colin
    1991 “Governmental Rationality: An introduction.” InThe Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Graham Burchell , Colin Gordon , and Peter Miller , 1–51. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Government of Singapore
    Government of Singapore 2015aSkillsFuture. Available at: www.skillsfuture.sg (accessedDecember 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Government of Singapore
    Government of Singapore 2015bWhat is SkillsFuture?Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdBobyZLl7M (accessedDecember 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Government of Singapore
    Government of Singapore 2015cYour SkillsFuture Journey. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkIBjH8z3GU (accessedDecember 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harvey, David
    2005A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hook, Derek
    2007Foucault, Psychology and Analytics of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230592322
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592322 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hookway, James
    2017 “Dumped by Trump, remaining TPP nations vow to forge ahead.” The Wall Street Journal, 21May. Available at: www.wsj.com/articles/dumped-by-trump-remaining-tpp-nations-vow-to-forge-ahead-1495345559 (accessedMay 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jessop, Bob
    2003 “Changes in Welfare Regimes and the Search for Flexibility and Employability.” InThe Political Economy of European Unemployment: European Integration and the Transnationalization of the Employment Question, ed. by Henk Overbeek , 21–50. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kochan, Thomas A.
    2016Shaping the Future of Work. New York: Business Expert Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kress, Gunther , and Teun van Leeuwen
    2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, Hsien Loong
    2009 Keynote address by Prime Minister of Singapore at APEC CEO Summit 2009, 13November. Available at: www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/keynote-address-mr-lee-hsien-loong-prime-minister-singapore-apec-ceo-summit-2009-13 (accessedMarch 2016).
  31. 2011 Speech by Prime Minister at EDB 50th Anniversary Gala Dinner, 1August. Available at: www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/speech-prime-minister-lee-hsien-loong-edb-50th-anniversary-gala-dinner-01-august-2011 (accessedMarch 2016).
  32. Leong, Grace
    2016 “Singapore still 2nd freest economy in the world but gap with top-ranked Hong Kong widens.” The Straits Times, 2February. Available at: www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/singapore-still-2nd-freest-economy-in-the-world-but-gap-with-top-ranked-hong-kong (accessedMarch 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Liow, Eugene Dili
    2012 “The Neoliberal-developmental State: Singapore as Case-study.” Critical Sociology38(2): 241–264. doi: 10.1177/0896920511419900
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511419900 [Google Scholar]
  34. Low, Donald , and Sudhir Vadaketh
    2014Hard Choices: Challenging the Singapore Consensus. Singapore: NUS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Machin, David , and Theo van Leeuwen
    (eds.) 2016Journal of Language and Politics15(3) (Special issue: Multimodality, politics and ideology). doi: 10.1075/jlp.15.3.01mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.01mac [Google Scholar]
  36. Marginson, Simon
    2011 “Higher Education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian Model.” Higher Education61(5): 587–611. doi: 10.1007/s10734‑010‑9384‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9384-9 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2010Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2014Applied Study in Polytechnics and Institute of Education Review Report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ministry of Finance
    Ministry of Finance 2010Economic Strategies Committee Report. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ministry of Trade and Industry
    Ministry of Trade and Industry 1998Committee on Singapore’s Competitiveness Report (Executive Summary). Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mitsikopoulou, Bessie
    (ed.) 2008Journal of Language and Politics7(3) (Special issue: Branding political entities in a globalised world). doi: 10.1075/jlp.7.3.01mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.3.01mit [Google Scholar]
  42. Mok, Ka Ho
    2006Education Reform and Education Policy in East Asia. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mulderrig, Jane
    2016 “Reframing obesity: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the UK’s First Social Marketing Campaign.” Critical Policy Studies. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2016.1191364.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1191364 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ng, Carl J. W. , and Veronika Koller
    2013 “Deliberate Conventional Metaphor in Images: The case of Corporate Branding Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol28(3): 131–147. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2013.797807
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.797807 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ng, Naomi
    2017 “Hong Kong Crowned World’s Most Competitive Economy, Beating Singapore.” South China Morning Post, 1June. Available at: www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/economy/article/2096456/hong-kong-crowned-worlds-most-competitive-economy (accessedJune 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ong, Aihwa
    2006Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822387879
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387879 [Google Scholar]
  47. Overbeek, Henk
    2003 “Globalization, Neo-liberalism and the Employment Question.” InThe Political Economy of European Unemployment: European Integration and the Transnationalization of the Employment Question, ed. by Henk Overbeek , 13–28. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pereira, Alexius A.
    2008 “Whither the Developmental State? Explaining Singapore’s continued developmentalism.” Third World Quarterly29(6): 1189–1203. doi: 10.1080/01436590802201162
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802201162 [Google Scholar]
  49. Read, Jason
    2009 “A genealogy of Homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity.” Foucault Studies6: 25–36. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465
    https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rodan, Garry
    2016 “Capitalism, Inequality and Ideology in Singapore: New Challenges for the Ruling Party.” Asian Studies Review40(2): 211–230. doi: 10.1080/10357823.2016.1155536
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1155536 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rose, Jacqueline
    1996States of Fantasy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rose, Nikolas
    1999Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488856
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856 [Google Scholar]
  53. Seow, Joanna
    2016 “New Statutory Boards to Focus on Skills, Employment.” The Straits Times, 13January. Available at: www.straitstimes.com/singapore/manpower/new-statutory-boards-to-focus-on-skills-employment (accessedFebruary 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Shanmugaratnam, Tharman
    2014 Speech by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance at the Official Opening of the Lifelong Learning Institute, 17September. Available at: www.mof.gov.sg/news-reader/articleid/1426/parentId/59/year/2014 (accessedMarch 2016).
  55. 2015 Singapore Budget Speech, 23February. Available at: www.singaporebudget.gov.sg/budget_2015/BudgetSpeech.aspx (accessedMarch 2016).
  56. Sim, Soek-Fang
    2005 “Social Engineering the World’s Freest Economy: Neo-liberal Capitalism and Neoliberal Governmentality in Singapore.” Rhizomes10. Available atwww.rhizomes.net/issue10/sim.htm (accessedMarch 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Steen, Gerard
    2008 “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why we Need a Three-dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol23(4): 213–241. doi: 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2011 “What Does ‘Really Deliberate’ Really Mean? More Thoughts on Metaphor and Consciousness.” Metaphor and the Social World1(1): 53–56. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  59. Steger, Manfred B.
    2009Globalisms: The Great Ideological Struggle of the Twenty-first Century, 3rd edn.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sum, Ngai-Ling , and Bob Jessop
    2013Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. doi: 10.4337/9780857930712
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930712 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tan, Kenneth P.
    2008 “Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological Shifts in Singapore.” International Political Science Review29(1): 7–27. doi: 10.1177/0192512107083445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107083445 [Google Scholar]
  62. Teo, You Yenn
    2012 “Neoliberal Morality in Singapore: Institutionalising the Logics of Neoliberalism.” ISA eSymposium for Sociology2(2). Available at: www.sagepub.net/isa/admin/viewEBPDF.aspx?&art=EBul-Teo-Jul2012.pdf&type=2
    [Google Scholar]
  63. The Heritage Foundation
    The Heritage Foundation 2016 “2016 Index of Economic Freedom: Global economic freedom expands; nearly 100 countries improve.” Available at: www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2016/press-releases/THF-2016-Index-Overview.pdf (accessedMarch 2016).
  64. Thibodeau, Paul H. , and Lera Boroditsky
    2011 “Metaphor we Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE6(2), e16782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2013 “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Thinking.” PLoS ONE8(1), e52961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tsoi, Grace , and Tessa Wong
    2016 “What are Hong Kong’s Localists Angry About?” BBC News, 11February. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-35547186 (accessedMarch 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Wee, C. J. Wan-ling
    2007The Asian Modern: Culture, Capitalist Development, Singapore. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press. doi: 10.5790/hongkong/9789622098596.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622098596.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wembridge, Mark
    2015 “Singapore Ruling Party Takes Flak over Wealth Gap.” Financial Times, 10September. Available at: www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9cfa3000-560f-11e5-a28b-50226830d644.html#axzz43lWYdxM7 (accessedMarch 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error