1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Volume 16, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article explores legitimacy-building in United States President’s 2013 Address to the Nation on Syria. Based on a slightly modified version of Theo van Leeuwen’s (2008) model of the discursive construction of legitimation and with a view of the war in Syria as the super-macro context of the Address, the investigation illustrates how the speech attempts to legitimate the prospect of a direct American military engagement in Syria on the one hand, and to justify avoiding another war that may prove too costly, on the other. Through the illustration of such discursive practices, the study portrays how critical discourse studies can provide the ground for awareness of a delicate aspect of the discourse of politics and the rhetoric of politicians in shaping public consent and projecting an always-legitimate image of even contradictory political positions, decisions, and actions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
2017-09-18
2024-04-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aune, James A. , and Martin J. Medhurst
    (eds) 2008 The Prospect of Presidential Rhetoric. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Austermuhl, Frank
    2002 “‘Creating hope’ – Narrative Strategies in Bill Clinton’s Rhetoric.” InInvestigations of Narrative Structures, ed. by Horst W. Drescher , Christian Todenhagen , and Wolfgang Thiele , 129–151. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2014 The Great American Scaffold: Intertextuality and Identity in American Presidential Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.53
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.53 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben-Porath, Eran N.
    2008 Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Billig, Michael
    2003 “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Rhetoric of Critique.” InCritical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Gilbert Weiss , and Ruth Wodak , 35–46. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, Ian
    2015 “ US Axes $500m Scheme to Train Syrian Rebels, Says NYT.” The Guardian, October9. AccessedApril 19, 2016. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/09/us-to-axe-5-scheme-train-syrian-rebels-nyt.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Borger, Julian , and Nick Hopkins
    2013 “West Training Syrian rebels in Jordan.” The Guardian, March8. AccessedApril 19, 2016. www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/08/west-training-syrian-rebels-jordan.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd, Michael S.
    2009 “De-Constructing Race and Identity in US Presidential Discourse: Barack Obama’s Speech on Race.” ATLANTIS: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies31 (2): 75–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cap, Piotr
    2002 Explorations in Political Discourse: Methodological and Critical Perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2006 Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Council on Foreign Relations
    Council on Foreign Relations 2016 “Council on Foreign Relations, Global Conflict Tracker.” AccessedApril19 2016 www.cfr.org/global/global-conflict-tracker/p32137#!/conflict/civil-war-in-syria
  12. Chang, Gordon C. , and Hugh B. Mehan
    2008 “Why We Must Attack Iraq: Bush’s Reasoning Practices and Argumentation System.” Discourse Society19 (4): 453–482. doi: 10.1177/0957926508089939
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508089939 [Google Scholar]
  13. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2013 Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooper, Tom
    2014 Syrian Conflagration: The Syrian Civil War, 2011–2013. Solihull: Helion.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dagher, Sam , and Farnaz Fassihi
    2013, August22. “Syria Presses Offensive, Shrugs off Gas Attack Claims.” The Wall Street Journal.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. de Gialdino, Vasilachis
    2010 “Labour, Workers and Work: Sociological and Linguistic Analysis of Political Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies7 (3): 203–217. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2010.491223
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491223 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunmire, Patricia
    2007 ““Emerging Threats” and “Coming Dangers”: Claiming the Future for Preventive War.” InDiscourse, War and Terrorism, ed. by Adam Hodge , and Chad Nilep , 19–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.24.05dun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24.05dun [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough, Norman
    1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee , and Michael Handford , 9–20. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairclough, Isabela , and Norman Fairclough
    2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fetzer, Anita , and Peter Bull
    2012 “Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse Society23 (2): 127–144. doi: 10.1177/0957926511431510
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431510 [Google Scholar]
  23. Filardo-Llamas, Laura
    2015 “Re-Contextualizing Political Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (3): 279–296. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013478
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013478 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gale, Tammy A.
    2010 “Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Davis, USA.
  25. Hart, Christopher , and Piotr Cap
    (eds) 2014 Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hodges, Adam
    2011 The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759590.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759590.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2013 “Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Rhetoric of Barack Obama.” Journal of Language and Politics12 (3): 357–377. doi: 10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie [Google Scholar]
  28. Krzyzanowski, Michal
    2014 “Values, Imaginaries and Templates of Journalistic Practice: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics24 (3): 345–365. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2014.930607
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.930607 [Google Scholar]
  29. Locke, Terry
    2004 Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lu, Louis Wei-Lun
    2008 “Ideological Influence on BUILDING Metaphors in Taiwanese Presidential Speeches.” Discourse and Society19 (3): 383–408. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088966
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088966 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maalej, Zouhair
    2012 “The ‘Jasmine Revolt’ has Made the ‘Arab Spring’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Last Three Political Speeches of the Ousted President of Tunisia.” Discourse Society23 (6): 679–700. doi: 10.1177/0957926512452973
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512452973 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazid, Bahaa-eddin M.
    2007 “Presuppositions and Strategic Functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics6 (3): 351–375. doi: 10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz [Google Scholar]
  33. McElroy, Damien
    2013 “UN Accuses Syrian Rebels of Chemical Weapons Use.” The Telegraph, May6.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Neagu, Maria-Ionela
    2013 Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137309907
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309907 [Google Scholar]
  35. Oddo, John
    2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse and Society22 (3): 287–314. doi: 10.1177/0957926510395442
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442 [Google Scholar]
  36. Olanrewaju, Faith , and Segun Joshua
    2015 “The Diplomatic Dimensions of the Syrian Conflict.” Jadavpur Journal of International Relations19 (1): 43–63. doi: 10.1177/0973598415608480
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598415608480 [Google Scholar]
  37. Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Ygram , Robert A. Ruiter , and Gerjo Kok
    2013 “Threatening Communication: A Critical Re-Analysis and a Revised Meta-Analytic Test of Fear Appeal Theory.” Health Psychology Review7 (1): 8–31. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pujante, David , and Esperanza Morales-Lopez
    2008 “A Political Action against Popular Opinion: Aznar’s Final Speech before the Spanish Parliament Justifying the War in Iraq (December 2003).” Journal of Language and Politics7 (1): 71–96. doi: 10.1075/jlp.7.1.04puj
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.04puj [Google Scholar]
  39. Reyes-Rodriguez, Antonio
    2008 “Discursive Strategies in Chavez’s Political Discourse: Voicing, Distancing, and Dhifting.” Critical Discourse Studies5 (2): 133–152. doi: 10.1080/17405900801990074
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990074 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse Society22 (6): 781–807. doi: 10.1177/0957926511419927
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  41. Richani, Nazih
    2016 “The Political Economy and Complex Interdependency of the War System in Syria.” Civil Wars18 (1): 45–68. doi: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1144495
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2016.1144495 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruiter, Rob. A. C. , Bas Verplanken , David De Cremer , and Gerjo Kok
    2004 “Danger and Fear Control in Response to Fear Appeals: The Role of Need for Cognition.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology26 (1): 13–24. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2601_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2601_2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Salama, Amir H. Y.
    2012 “The Rhetoric of Collocational, Intertextual and Institutional Pluralization in Obama’s Cairo Speech: A Discourse-Analytical Approach.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (3): 211–229. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.688296
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688296 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shukry, Azimah S. M.
    2013 “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Mahathir Mohamad’s Speeches on the “War on Terror”.” Intellectual Discourse21 (2): 171–195.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Solomon, Jay , and Nour Malas
    2012 “U.S. Bolsters Ties to Fighters in Syria.” The Wall Street Journal, June13. AccessedApril 19, 2016. online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303410404577464763551149048.html
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Teo, Chin S. P. and Cui Ruiguo
    2015 “Imag(in)ing the Nation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Singapore’s National Day Rally Speech.” Journal of Language and Politics14 (5): 645–664. doi: 10.1075/jlp.14.5.02teo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.5.02teo [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1995 “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” InLanguage and Peace, ed. by Christina Schaffner , and Anita Wenden , 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 1997 Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446221884.n1
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n1 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton , and Christina Schaffner , 204–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamines. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  50. 2005 “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally: Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics4 (1): 65–91. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij [Google Scholar]
  51. 2006a “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society17 (2): 359–383. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2006b “Politics, Ideology and Discourse.” InElsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), ed. by Ruth Wodak , 728–740. Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00722‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2007 “Macro Contexts.” InDiscourse and International Relations, ed. by Dagmar Scheu Lottgen , and Jose Saura Sanchez , 3–26. Bern: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2009 Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511575273
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2012 “Discourse and Knowledge.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee , and Michael Handford , 587–603. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed), ed. by Deborah Tannen , Heidi E. Hamilton , and Deborah Schiffrin , 466–485. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication1 (1): 91–112. doi: 10.1177/1750481307071986
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InConcise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd ed), ed. by Jacob L. May , 166–169. Oxford: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Leeuwen, Theo , and Ruth Wodak
    1999 ”Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Perspective.” Discourse Studies1 (1): 83–118. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wakim, Jamal
    2013 The Struggle of Major Powers Over Syria. Reading: Ithaca Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. White House
    White House 2013 “Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on Syria.” The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, September10 2013 AccessedApril 19, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/09/10/remarks-president-address-nation-syria
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
    2008 “Proximisation, Common Ground, and Assertion-Based Patterns for Legitimisation in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines2 (1): 31–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wilson, Scott , and Joby Warrick
    2011 “Assad Must Go, Obama Says.” The Washington Post, August18. AccessedApril 19, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/assad-must-go-obama-says/2011/08/18/gIQAelheOJ_story.html
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Wodak, Ruth
    2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230316539
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2012 “Politics as Usual: Investigating Political Discourse in Action.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee , and Michael Handford , 525–540. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 2013 Critical Discourse Analysis (Four Volumes). London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446286289
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446286289 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wodak, Ruth , Wimston Kwon , and Ian Clarke
    2011 “‘Getting People on Board’: Discursive Leadership for Consensus Building in Team Meetings.” Discourse and Society22 (5): 592–644. doi: 10.1177/0957926511405410
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511405410 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
Loading
Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria
Journal of Language and Politics 16, 706 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical discourse studies; discourse of politics; discursive construction of legitimation; Obama speeches; political discourse analysis; political speeches; presidential speeches; war rhetoric

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error