A sentiment democracy?

References

1. Ceron, Andrea
   2016 “Competing Principals 2.0? The impact of Facebook in the 2013 selection of the Italian Head of State.” Italian Political Science Review46(3): 313–333. doi: 10.1017/ipo.2016.14
   https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2016.14 [Google Scholar]
2. Ceron, Andrea
   2017a “Intra-party politics in 140 characters.” Party Politics23(1): 7–17. doi: 10.1177/1354068816654325
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816654325 [Google Scholar]
3. Ceron, Andrea
   2017b Social Media and Political Accountability: Bridging the Gap between Citizens and Politicians. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑52627‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52627-0 [Google Scholar]
4. Ceron, Andrea , Luigi Curini , and Stefano Iacus
   2016 “iSA: a fast, scalable and accurate algorithm for sentiment analysis of social media content.” Information Sciences367–368: 105–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.05.052
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.05.052 [Google Scholar]
5. Chadwick, Andrew , and Jennifer Stromer-Galley
   2016 “Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline or Party Renewal?” International Journal of Press/Politics21(3): 283–293. doi: 10.1177/1940161216646731
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731 [Google Scholar]
6. Fraustino, Julia D. , and Liang Ma
   2015 “CDC’s Use of Social Media and Humor in a Risk Campaign – “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse”.” Journal of Applied Communication Research43(2): 222–241. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2015.1019544
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2015.1019544 [Google Scholar]
7. Gibson, Rachel K.
   2015 “Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning.” Party Politics21(2): 183–197. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472575
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575 [Google Scholar]
8. Graham, Todd , Dan Jackson , and Marcel Broersma
   2016 “New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns.” New Media & Society18(5): 765–783. doi: 10.1177/1461444814546728
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546728 [Google Scholar]
9. Hoffmann, Marc , Mathieu Rosenbaum , and Nakahiro Yoshida
   2013 “Estimation of the lead – lag parameter from non-synchronous data.” Bernoulli19(2): 426–461. doi: 10.3150/11‑BEJ407
   https://doi.org/10.3150/11-BEJ407 [Google Scholar]
10. Howard, Philip N.
    2005 New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615986
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615986 [Google Scholar]
11. Karlsson, Martin , and Joachim Åström
    2016 “The political blog space: A new arena for political representation?” New Media & Society18(3): 465–483. doi: 10.1177/1461444814543990
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543990 [Google Scholar]
12. Larsson, Anders O.
    2013 ““Rejected bits of program code”: Why notions of “Politics 2.0” remain (mostly) unfulfilled.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics10(1): 72–85. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2012.719727
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.719727 [Google Scholar]
13. Larsson, Anders O. , and Øyvind Ihlen
    2015 “Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections.” European Journal of Communication30(6): 666–681. doi: 10.1177/0267323115595525
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115595525 [Google Scholar]
14. Margetts, Helen
    2006 “Cyber Parties.” InHandbook of Party Politicsed by Richard Katz and William Crotty , 528–535. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781848608047.n46
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608047.n46 [Google Scholar]
15. Mosca, Lorenzo , Cristian Vaccari , and Augusto Valeriani
    2015 “An Internet-Fuelled Party? The Five Star Movement and the Web.” InBeppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideologyed by Filippo Tronconi , 127–152. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Neuman, Russell W. , Lauren Guggenheim , S. Mo Jang , and Soo Young Bae
    2014 “The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data.” Journal of Communication64(2): 194–214. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 [Google Scholar]
17. Niederdeppe, Jeff , Kathryn Heley , and Colleen Barry
    2015 “Inoculation and Narrative Strategies in Competitive Framing of Three Health Policy Issues.” Journal of Communication65(5): 838–862. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12162
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12162 [Google Scholar]
18. Scarrow, Susan E.
    2015 Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Suler, John
    2004 “The online disinhibition effect.” CyberPsychology and Behavior7(3): 321–326. doi: 10.1089/1094931041291295
    https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 [Google Scholar]
20. Tromble, Rebekah
    2016 “Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter.” New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444816669158
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158 [Google Scholar]
21. Vaccari, Cristian , and Augusto Valeriani
    2015 “Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign.” New Media and Society17(7): 1025–1042. doi: 10.1177/1461444813511038
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511038 [Google Scholar]
22. Vaccari, Cristian , and Augusto Valeriani
    2016 “Party Campaigners or Citizen Campaigners? How Social Media Deepen and Broaden Party-Related Engagement.” International Journal of Press/Politics21(3): 294–312. doi: 10.1177/1940161216642152
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642152 [Google Scholar]
23. Vergeer, Maurice , Liesbeth Hermans , and Steven Sam
    2013 “Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: the exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style.” Party Politics19(3): 477–501. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407580
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580 [Google Scholar]
24. Wright, Scott
    2012 “Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation.” New Media & Society14(2): 244–261. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410679
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410679 [Google Scholar]