1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates, over an 18-month period surrounding the 2016 Brexit referendum, the commenting activity of nearly 2 million Facebook users engaging with political news from British media or with the posts of referendum campaigns. We ask whether citizens’ engagement with political news on Facebook motivates their participation with political campaign posts, and we examine whether users commenting on campaign pages trend towards ideologically reinforcing media. Overall, we find comparatively low levels of commenting activity on the official referendum campaigns vis-à-vis the media, and the majority of users (70%) commented only once. Looking at the subset of users commenting on both page types (“cross-posters”), we identify a general spillover effect from media to campaign pages, suggesting a positive correlation between political interest and online participation on Facebook. Reverse spillover occurs immediately around and after the vote, with Remain cross-posters active on the Guardian while Leave cross-posters’ media engagement registers as more diffuse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17009.dut
2017-11-20
2018-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bimber, Bruce , Marta C. Cunhill , Lauren Copeland , and Rachel Gibson
    2015 “Digital Media and Political Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Interest across Acts and Over Time.” Social Science Computer Review33: 21–42. doi: 10.1177/0894439314526559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314526559 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bossetta, Michael , Anamaria Dutceac Segesten , and Hans-Jörg Trenz
    2017 “Engaging with European Politics through Twitter and Facebook : Participation beyond the National?” InSocial Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era, ed. by Mauro Barisione , and Asimina Michailidou , 53–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59890‑5_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulianne, Shelley
    2011 “Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects between News Media and Political Interest.” Political Communication28 (2): 147–162. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.540305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.540305 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer, Dominic
    2013The Life Informatic: Newsmaking in the Digital Era. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi: 10.7591/cornell/9780801451881.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801451881.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruns, Axel
    2005Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bullock, John G.
    2011 “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review10: 496–515. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000165
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000165 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantijoch, Marta , David Cutts , and Rachel Gibson
    2016 “Moving Slowly up the Ladder of Political Engagement: A ‘Spill-over’ Model of Internet Participation.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (1): 26–48. doi: 10.1111/1467‑856X.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12067 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chadwick, Andrew
    2013The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahlgren, Peter
    2013The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137326386
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326386 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dahlgren, Peter , and Tobias Olsson
    2008 “Facilitating Political Participation: Young Citizens, Internet and Civic Cultures.” InInternational Handbook of Children, Media and Culture, ed. by Kirsten Drotner , and Sonia Livingstone , 493–507. London: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781848608436.n30
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608436.n30 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Vreese, Claes H.
    2007The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230591189
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591189 [Google Scholar]
  12. Druckman, James N. , Erik Peterson , and Rune Slothuus
    2013 “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review107 (1): 57–79. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000500
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dutceac Segesten, Anamaria , and Michael Bossetta
    2017 “A Typology of Political Participation Online: How Citizens used Twitter to Mobilize during the 2015 British General Elections.” Information, Communication & Society20 (11): 1625–1643. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413 [Google Scholar]
  14. Esser, Frank , and Jesper Strömbäck
    2014Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137275844
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844 [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans, Heather K. , Victoria Cordova , and Savannah Sipole
    2014 “Twitter Style: An Analysis of how House Candidates used Twitter in their 2012 Campaigns.” PS: Political Science & Politics47 (2): 454–462.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Freelon, Deen
    2017 “Campaigns in Control: Analyzing Controlled Interactivity and Message Discipline on Facebook.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics1–14. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2017.1309309
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1309309 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gardiner, Becky , Mahana Mansfield , Ian Anderson , Josh Holder , Daan Louter , and Monica Ulmanu
    2016 “The dark side of Guardian comments.” The Guardian, April12 2016 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/12/the-dark-side-of-guardian-comments.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haleva-Amir, Sharon , and Karine Nahon
    2016 “Electoral Politics on Social Media.” InRoutledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. by Axel Bruns , Gunn Enli , Eli Skogerbo , Anders Olof Larsson , and Chrstian Christensen , 471–487. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hallin, Daniel C. , and Paolo Mancini
    2004Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790867
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hobolt, Sara B.
    2009Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549948.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549948.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Iyengar, Shanto , and Sean J. Westwood
    2015 “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science59: 690–707. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152 [Google Scholar]
  22. Leruth, Benjamin , Yordan Kutiyski , André Krouwel , and Nicholas J. Startin
    2017 “Does the Information Source Matter? Newspaper Readership, Political Preferences and Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom, France and The Netherlands.” InEuroscepticism, Democracy and the Media: Communicating Europe, Contesting Europe, ed. by Manuela Caiani , and Simona Guerra , 109–131. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59643‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nielsen, Rasmus K. , and Cristian Vaccari
    2013 “Do People ‘Like’ Politicians on Facebook? Not Really: Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon.” International Journal of Communication7: 2333–2356.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pedersen, Rasmus T.
    2014 “News Media Framing of Negative Campaigning.” Mass Communication and Society17: 898–919. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.858749
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.858749 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pariser, Eli
    2011The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Prior, Markus
    2005 “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science49: 577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2005.00143.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Quinlan, Stephen , Mark Shephard , and Lindsay Paterson
    2015 “Online Discussion and the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum: Flaming Keyboards or Forums for Deliberation?” Electoral Studies38: 192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Semetko, Holli A. , and de Vreese, Claes H.
    2004Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Strömbäck, Jesper , and Adam Shehata
    2010 “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships between News Media exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research49: 575–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2009.01913.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Sunstein, Cas R.
    2009Going Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia
    2012 “Political Participation and Web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook.” Public Relations Review38: 466–470. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17009.dut
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17009.dut
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error