1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

‘Populism’ constitutes one of the most hotly debated topics in contemporary politics and academia. The concept is used to describe a series of heterogeneous phenomena: on the one hand, Donald Trump, BREXIT supporters and the European Far Right in government or in opposition; on the other, Bernie Sanders, the so-called Pink Tide of left-wing populist governments in Latin America and inclusionary populisms in the European South. Recent developments have undoubtedly generated significant research material and a new impetus to the scope and impact of populism research. However, major challenges have also been created, requiring urgent attention. This paper discusses three such challenges (reflexivity, definition, typology) from a discursive perspective. Starting from a double hermeneutic focus on the interaction between academic theorization and political orientation, it highlights the importance of discourse theory in populism research and concludes by formulating a crucial theoretico-political dilemma populism researchers are increasingly facing today.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta
2017-06-12
2019-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barthes, Roland
    1979 “Lecture in Inauguration of the Chair of Literary Semiology”, Collège de France, January7 1977 October8: 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, Judith
    2017 “Trump is Emancipating Unbridled Hatred”, Zeit Online, 28October 2016 Accessed1 March 2017. www.zeit.de/kultur/2016-10/judith-butler-donald-trump-populism-interview/komplettansicht
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Canovan, Margaret
    1981Populism. London: Junction Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, Robert
    1989 .“The Originality Trap: Richard Hofstadter on Populism”. The Journal of American History76(1): 150–167. doi: 10.2307/1908347
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1908347 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Cleen, Benjamin and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: Discourse Theory and the Study of Populism and Nationalism”. Javnost – The Publicforthcoming. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  6. De la Torre, Carlos
    (ed.) 2014The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. The University of Kentucky Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Diamandouros, Nikiforos
    1994 “Cultural Dualism and Political Change in Post-authoritarian Greece”. Working paper 50. Madrid: Instituto Juan March.
  8. Dyrberg, Torben Bech
    2006 “Radical and Plural Democracy: In Defence of Right/Left and Public Reason”. InRadical Democracy. Politics Between Abundance and Lack, ed. by Lars Tønder and Lasse Thomassen , 67–84. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser, Nancy
    2017 “Against Progressive Neoliberalism, A New Progressive Populism”, Dissent, January28 2017 Accessed1 March 2017. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/nancy-fraser-against-progressive-neoliberalism-progressive-populism
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Germani, Gino
    1978Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick: Transaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilman, Nils
    2003Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Habermas, Jurgen
    2013The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofstadter, Richard
    1955 “The Folklore of Populism”. InThe Age of Reform. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Krugman, Paul
    2016 “Our Unknown Country”, New York Times, 9November 2016 Accessed1 March 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/the-unknown-country.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laclau, Ernesto
    1977Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: NLR Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe
    [1985] 2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Latham, Michael
    2000Modernization as Ideology. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Latour, Bruno
    2016 “Two Bubbles of Unrealism: Learning From the Tragedy of Trump”. Los Angeles Review of Books, 17November 2016 Accessed1 March 2017. https://lareviewofbooks.org /article/two-bubbles-unrealism-learning-tragedy-trump/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lipset, Seyour Martin
    1960Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mouffe, Chantal
    2016 “In Defense of Left-wing Populism”, The Conversation, 29April 2016 Accessed1 March 2017. https://theconversation.com/in-defence-of-left-wing-populism-55869
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mudde, Cas and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser
    (eds.) 2012Populism in Europe and the Americas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139152365
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013 “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America”. Government and Opposition48(2): 147–174. doi: 10.1017/gov.2012.11
    https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nugent, Walter
    [1963] 2013The Tolerant Populists: Kansas Populism and Nativism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ostiguy, Pierre
    2009 “The High-Low Political Divide: Rethinking Populism and Anti- Populism”. Kellogg Institute Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series360. Accessed1 March 2017. nd.edu/~kellogg/publications/workingpapers/WPS/360.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Panizza, Francisco
    (ed.) 2005Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Piketty, Thomas
    2017 “Long Live Populism!”, Le Monde, 17January 2017 Accessed1 March 2017. piketty.blog.lemonde.fr/2017/01/17/long-live-populism/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pollack, Norman
    1962The Populist Response to Industrial America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2004 “Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece”. Journal of Political Ideologies9(3): 253–267. doi: 10.1080/1356931042000263519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2014 “The Return of ‘the People’: Populism and Anti-Populism in the Shadow of the European Crisis”. Constellations21(4): 505–517. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8675.12127
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12127 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2016 “Debt Society Consolidated? Post-democratic Subjectivity and its Discontents”. In Henrietta Moore , Nicholas Long and Joanna Cook (eds) The State We’re In: Reflecting on Democracy’s Troubles, 167–189. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2017 “Populism and Hegemony”. In Paul Taggart , Cristobal Róvira Kaltwasser , Paulina Ochoa Espejo and Pierre Ostiguy (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism, forthcoming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stavrakakis, Yannis and Giorgos Katsambekis
    2014 “Left-wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA”. Journal of Political Ideologies19(2): 119–142. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stavrakakis, Yannis , Ioannis Andreadis and Giorgos Katsambekis
    2016 “A New Populism Index at Work: Identifying Populist Candidates and Parties in the Contemporary Greek Context”. European Politics and Society, advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434 [Google Scholar]
  35. Stavrakakis, Yannis , Giorgos Katsambekis , Alexandros Kioupkiolis , Thomas Siomos and Nikos Nikisianis
    2017 “Extreme Right-wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association”. Critical Discourse Studies, advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325 [Google Scholar]
  36. Vann Woodward, Comer
    1981 “Who Are ‘the People’?”. The New Republic, 16May, 32–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse , Essex School , populism , reflexivity and typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error