1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Extending Laclau’s (2005) claim to the importance of ‘populism’ for a democratic politics, I argue that the ‘we’, when issued from a left-wing position around ‘empty signifiers’, must be informed by an inclusionary logic. In my critical study of the Hungarian Government’s right-wing populist discourses, I show that their billboard campaign in 2016 against the European Union’s migrant quota articulates the ‘we are not like them’ exclusionary distinction of ‘against and over’. Through Judith Butler’s category of vulnerability and Mary Matsuda’s relative distinction between immediate and indirect targets of exclusion, I explore the inclusionary logic of the campaign by the Two-Tailed Dog Party. I demonstrate that a non-identitarian collective subject "from below" in their alternative left-wing populism is made possible by the power of irony that may sidestep the mobilising force of fear that should legitimise the Government’s agenda.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
2017-06-12
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barát, Erzsébet
    2012 “Queering the intersection of legislative, religious, and higher educational exclusion: Revisiting the First Case of collective LGBT litigation in Hungary.” InTransport of Queer Theory, ed. by Katharina M. Wiedlack , and Sushila Mesquita , 81–95. Vienna: Zaglossus.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1996 “Are You an Alien? Ideologies at Work in the Printed Hungarian Media.” InFraming the Issues: British Studies – Media Studies Conference Papers, ed. by John Cunningham and János Horváth , 125–48. Budapest: British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, Judith
    2004Precarious Life – The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2015Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/9780674495548
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674495548 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiantrea-Stutte, Patricia , and Adrea Pető
    2003 “Cultures of Populism and the Political Right in Central Europe.” Comparative Literature and Culture5(4): 417–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Connell, W. Raewyn and James Messerschmidt
    2005 “Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept.” Gender and Society19(6): 829–859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hutchings, Stephen , and Vera Tolz
    2015Nation, Ethnicity and Race on Russian Television: Mediating Post-Soviet Difference. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1996 “Why do empty signifiers matter to politics?” InEmancipation(s), ed. by Ernesto Laclau , 36–46. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mari J. Matsuda , Charles R. Lawrence III , Richard Delgado , and Kimberlé Crenshaw
    1993Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. Colorado and Oxford: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pelinka, Anton
    2013 “Right-wing populism: Concept and typology.” InRight-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, ed. by Ruth Wodak , Majid KhosraviNik , and Brigitte Mral , 3–22. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error