1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862

Abstract

This paper explores the connection between the rise of new types of online uncivil discourses and the recent success of populism. While discussions on the upsurge of populism have centred on institutionalised politics and politicians, only limited attention has been paid to how the success of the former and the latter was propelled by developments outside of the political realm narrowly conceived. Our interest is therefore in the rise of uncivil society, especially on the web, and in its ‘borderline discourse’ at the verge of civil and uncivil ideas, ideologies and norms. Those discourses – showcased here on the example of the language on immigration/refugees in Austria and Sweden – have been using civil-to-uncivil shifts in the discursive representations of society and politics. They have progressively ‘normalised’ the anti-pluralist views across many European public spheres on a par with nativist and exclusionary views now widely propagated by right-wing populist politics in Europe and beyond.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
2017-08-07
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlp.17028.krz.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alvares, Claudia , and Peter Dahlgren
    2016 “Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain.” European Journal of Communication31(1): 46–57. doi: 10.1177/0267323115614485
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115614485 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks, Deborah J. and John G. Geer
    2007 “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science51(1): 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2007.00233.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Calhoun, Craig
    2016 “Populism and Digital Democracy”. Berggruen Insights6 (10/2016). Accessed4 March 2017. insights.berggruen.org/issues/issue-6/institute_posts/156
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahlgren, Peter , and Claudia Alvares
    2013 “Political Participation in an age of Mediatisation.” Javnost – The Public20(2): 47–65. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2013.11009114
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2013.11009114 [Google Scholar]
  5. Engel, Jakob , and Ruth Wodak
    2013 “‘Calculated ambivalence’ and holocaust denial in Austria.” InAnalysing Fascist Discourseed. by Ruth Wodak and John E. Richardson , 73–96. London: Routledge,.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Forchtner, Bernhard , Michał Krzyżanowski , and Ruth Wodak
    2013 “Mediatisation, right-wing populism and political campaigning: the case of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ).” InMedia Talk and Political Elections in Europe and Americaed. by Andrew Tolson and Mats Ekström , 205–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137273321_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273321_10 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwyn, Lawrence
    1976Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Groshek, Jacob , and Chelsea Cutino
    2016 “Meaner on Mobile: Incivility and Impoliteness in Communicating Contentious Politics on Sociotechnical Networks.” Social Media + Society, October-December 2016: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hainsworth, Paul
    (ed.) 2016The Extreme Right in Europe and the USA. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harcourt, Bernard E.
    2012 “The Politics of Incivility.” Arizona Law Review, 54: 1–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harsin, Jason
    2015 “Regimes of Post-truth, Post-politics, and Attention Economies.” Communication, Culture & Critique8: 327–333. doi: 10.1111/cccr.12097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097 [Google Scholar]
  13. Krugman, Paul
    2011 “The Post-Truth Campaign.” The New York Times (New York Edition), 23December 2011, 31.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2013a “From Anti-Immigration and Nationalist Revisionism to Islamophobia: Continuities and Shifts in Recent Discourses and Patterns of Political Communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).” InRightwing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourseed. by Ruth Wodak et. al. , 135–148. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2013b “Discourses and concepts: Interfaces and synergies between Begriffsgeschichte and the discourse-historical approach in CDA.” InCritical Discourse Analysised. by Ruth Wodak , Vol.4, 201–214. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society27(3): 308–321. doi: 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2018a “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicisation and Mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16(1). In press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2018b “‘We Are a Small Country that Has Done Enormously Lot’: The ‘Refugee Crisis’ & the Hybrid Discourse of Politicising Immigration in Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16(1). In press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Krzyżanowski, Michał , and Ruth Wodak
    2009The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, Robin T.
    2017 “The Hollow Man.” Journal of Language & Politics16:4, in press doi: 10.1075/jlp.17022.lak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17022.lak [Google Scholar]
  23. Link, Jürgen
    2014Versuch über den Normalismus. Berlin: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
    2008 “Populism and the Media.” InTwenty-First Century Populismed. by Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell , 49–64. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1057/9780230592100_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592100_4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mammone, Andrea , Emmanuel Godin , and Brin Jenkins
    (eds.) 2012Mapping the Extreme Right in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Matouschek, Bernd , Ruth Wodak , and Franz Januschek
    1995Notwendige Maßnahmen gegen Fremde? Genese und Formen von rassistischen Diskursen der Differenz. Wien: Passagen Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mudde, Caas , and Cristobal R. Kaltwasser
    2017Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller, Jan-Werner
    2016What is Populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812293784
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784 [Google Scholar]
  29. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2004 “Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups.” New Media & Society6: 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444 [Google Scholar]
  30. Reisigl, Martin , and Ruth. Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruzza, Carlo
    2009 “Populism and Euroscepticism: Towards Uncivil Society?” Policy and Society28(1): 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rydgren, Jens
    2005Från skattemissnöje till etnisk nationalism. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rydgren, Jens , and Sara van der Meiden
    2016Sweden, Now a Country Like All the Others? The Radical Right and the End of Swedish Exceptionalism. Working Paper 25, Sociology Dept. / Stockholm University, www.jensrydgren.com/WP25.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rydgren, Jens
    (ed.) 2017The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Santana, Arthur D.
    2014 “Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards.” Journalism Practice8: 18–33. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1982Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sobieraj, Sarah , and Jeffrey M. Berry
    2011 “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication28(1): 19–41. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360 [Google Scholar]
  38. Theocharis, Yiannis , Pablo Barberá , Zoltan Fazekas , Sebastian A. Popa , and Olivier Parnet
    2016 “A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting With Party Candidates.” Journal of Communication66(6): 1007–1031. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12259
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259 [Google Scholar]
  39. Triandafyllidou, Anna , Michał Krzyżanowski and Ruth Wodak
    (eds.) 2018The Politicisation and Mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis; in Europe. (Special Issue ofJournal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16:1 & 16:2).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1991 “The interdisciplinary study of news as discourse.” InHandbook of Qualitative Methods in Mass Communication Researched. by Klaus Bruhn-Jensen and Nicholas W. Jankowski , 108–120. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wilson, John K.
    1995The Myth of Political Correctness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wodak, Ruth
    2003 “Populist Discourses: The Rhetoric of Exclusion in Written Genres.” Document Design4(2): 132–148. doi: 10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod [Google Scholar]
  43. 2015aThe Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015b “’Normalisierung nach rechts’: Politischer Diskurs im Spannungsfeld von Neoliberalismus, Populismus und kritischer Öffentlichkeit.” Linguistik Online73 (4). Accessed4 March 2017. doi: 10.13092/lo.73.2191
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.73.2191 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2017 “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Élites’, and the ‘People’: Who’s Who?Journal of Language & Politics16:4. In press. doi: 10.1075/jlp.17030.wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17030.wod [Google Scholar]
  46. Wodak, Ruth , and Anton Pelinka
    (eds.) 2002The Haider Phenomenon in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wodak, Ruth and John E. Richardson
    2009 “On the Politics of Remembering (or Not).” Critical Discourse Studies6(4): 231–235. doi: 10.1080/17405900903180954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903180954 [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Yardi, Sarita , and Danah Boyd
    2010 “Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30: 316–327. doi: 10.1177/0270467610380011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error