“The people” in populist discourse

References

1. Cap, Piotr
   2013 Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.232
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
2. Carroll, Lewis
   1871 Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. London: Macmillan. See also: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/c/carroll/lewis/looking/chapter6.html, based on the1896 edition.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chilton, Paul
   1994 “La plaie qu’il convient de fermer …” Les métaphores du discours raciste. Journal of Pragmatics21 (6): 583–619. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90100‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90100-7 [Google Scholar]
4. Chilton, Paul
   1996 Security Metaphors. Geneva: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chilton, Paul
   2004 Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chilton, Paul
   2014 Language, Space and Mind. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
7. Chilton, Paul
   2017 forthcoming. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et société: 160–161.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gallese, Vittorio
   2009 Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues19: 519–536. doi: 10.1080/10481880903231910
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10481880903231910 [Google Scholar]
9. Gallese, Vittorio
   2013 Mirror neurons and art. InArt and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci & D. Melcher , pp.441–9. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gallese, Vittorio
    2016 The Multimodal Nature of Visual Perception: Facts and Speculations. Gestalt Theory38 (2/3): 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1982 Frame semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea, pp.111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gallie, Walter B.
    1964 Essentially Contested Concepts. In W. B. Gallie , Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, pp.157–191. London: Chatto & Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hart, Christopher J.
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
14. Hart, Christopher
    2015 Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies12 (3):238–260. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479 [Google Scholar]
15. Hart, Christopher
    2016 The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse analysis: integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse and Society3(27): 335–50. doi: 10.1177/0957926516630896
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630896 [Google Scholar]
16. Isenberg, Nancy , D. Silbersweig , A. Engelien , S. Emmerich , K. Malavade , B. Beattie , A. C. Leon , & E. Stern
    1999 Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy. of Sciciences USA96: 10456–10459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10456
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10456 [Google Scholar]
17. Johnson, Mark
    1987 The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kaal, Bertie
    2017 Worldview and Social Practice: A Discourse-Space \Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Univesiteit Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kopytowska, Monika
    2015a Ideology of “here and now”. Mediating distance in television news. Critical Discourse Studies12(3): 347–365. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013485
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013485 [Google Scholar]
20. Kopytowska, Monika
    2015b Covering conflict: between universality and cultural specificity in news discourse genre and journalistic style. International Review of Pragmatics7: 308–339. doi: 10.1163/18773109‑00702007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702007 [Google Scholar]
21. Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mudde, Cas
    2002 The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Manchester University Press. doi: 10.7228/manchester/9780719057939.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719057939.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Mudde, Cas
    2007 Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511492037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 [Google Scholar]
24. Müller, Jan-Werner
    2016 What is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812293784
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784 [Google Scholar]
25. Pulvermuller, Friedemann
    2013 How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract semantics. Cognitive Scences17(9): 458–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
26. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
27. Ziem, Alexander
    2014 Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.48 [Google Scholar]