1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

At the centre of populism is a problem of meaning. We could simply say it is a semiotic problem, but I would like to go further, and say that it’s a cognitive problem, one intrinsic to the human nervous system. It is a characteristic of our species that becomes highly active and significant in group action at certain social and historical conjunctures. The problem is the meaning of the word , which on most accounts is centrally important for making out what the phenomenon called “populism” is about. It is unhelpful to say the word is meaningless or vague, because clearly something is going on in the minds of its users and their hearers. That something is not simply about ; it is about activating a mental effect.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
2017-06-12
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cap, Piotr
    2013Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll, Lewis
    1871Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. London: Macmillan. See also: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/c/carroll/lewis/looking/chapter6.html, based on the1896 edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chilton, Paul
    1994 “La plaie qu’il convient de fermer …” Les métaphores du discours raciste. Journal of Pragmatics21 (6): 583–619. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90100‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90100-7 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1996Security Metaphors. Geneva: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2004Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014Language, Space and Mind. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 forthcoming. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et société: 160–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallese, Vittorio
    2009 Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues19: 519–536. doi: 10.1080/10481880903231910
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10481880903231910 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2013 Mirror neurons and art. InArt and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci & D. Melcher , pp.441–9. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2016 The Multimodal Nature of Visual Perception: Facts and Speculations. Gestalt Theory38 (2/3): 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1982 Frame semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea, pp.111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallie, Walter B.
    1964 Essentially Contested Concepts. In W. B. Gallie , Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, pp.157–191. London: Chatto & Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hart, Christopher J.
    2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hart, Christopher
    2015 Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies12 (3):238–260. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2016 The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse analysis: integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse and Society3(27): 335–50. doi: 10.1177/0957926516630896
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630896 [Google Scholar]
  16. Isenberg, Nancy , D. Silbersweig , A. Engelien , S. Emmerich , K. Malavade , B. Beattie , A. C. Leon , & E. Stern
    1999 Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy. of Sciciences USA96: 10456–10459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10456
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10456 [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, Mark
    1987The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaal, Bertie
    2017Worldview and Social Practice: A Discourse-Space \Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Univesiteit Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kopytowska, Monika
    2015a Ideology of “here and now”. Mediating distance in television news. Critical Discourse Studies12(3): 347–365. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013485
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013485 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2015b Covering conflict: between universality and cultural specificity in news discourse genre and journalistic style. International Review of Pragmatics7: 308–339. doi: 10.1163/18773109‑00702007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mudde, Cas
    2002The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Manchester University Press. doi: 10.7228/manchester/9780719057939.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719057939.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2007Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511492037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller, Jan-Werner
    2016What is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812293784
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pulvermuller, Friedemann
    2013 How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract semantics. Cognitive Scences17(9): 458–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ziem, Alexander
    2014Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.48 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): affect , cognition , collocation , language , meaning , neuroscience , People , populism and word frequency
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error