Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
  • Moral discourse in the Twitterverse

    Effects of ideology and political sophistication on language use among U.S. citizens and members of Congress

  • Author(s): Joanna Sterling 1  and John T. Jost 2
  • View Affiliations Hide Affiliations
    1 Department of Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University
    2 Department of Psychology, New York University
  • Source: Journal of Language and Politics, Volume 17, Issue 2, Jan 2018, p. 195 - 221
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17034.ste
    • Received: 22 Feb 2017
    • Accepted: 30 Sept 2017
    • Version of Record published : 24 Nov 2017


We analyzed Twitter language to explore hypotheses derived from moral foundations theory, which suggests that liberals and conservatives prioritize different values. In Study 1 , we captured 11 million tweets from nearly 25,000 U.S. residents and observed that liberals expressed fairness concerns more often than conservatives, whereas conservatives were more likely to express concerns about group loyalty, authority, and purity. Increasing political sophistication exacerbated ideological differences in authority and group loyalty. At low levels of sophistication, liberals used more harm language, but at high levels of sophistication conservatives referenced harm more often. In Study 2 , we analyzed 59,000 tweets from 388 members of the U.S. Congress. Liberal legislators used more fairness- and harm-related words, whereas conservative legislators used more authority-related words. Unexpectedly, liberal legislators used more language pertaining to group loyalty and purity. Follow-up analyses suggest that liberals and conservatives in Congress use similar words to emphasize different policy priorities.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adorno, Theodor W. , Else Frenkel-Brunswik , Daniel J. Levinson , and R. Nevitt Sanford
    1950The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albaugh, Quinn , Julie Sevenans , Stuart Soroka , and Peter John Loewen
    2013 “The automated coding of policy agendas: A dictionary-based approach.” In6th Annual Comparative Agendas Conference , Antwerp, Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altemeyer, Bob
    1998 “The Other ‘Authoritarian Personality’.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology30: 47–92. doi: 10.1016/S0065‑2601(08)60382‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , Majid KhosraviNik , Michał Krzyżanowski , Tony McEnery , and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society19: 273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barberá, Pablo
    2015 “Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together. Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation using Twitter Data.” Political Analysis23: 76–91. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpu011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barberá, Pablo , John T. Jost , Jonathan Nagler , Joshua Tucker , and Richard Bonneau
    2015 “Tweeting from Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?” Psychological Science26: 1531–1542. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barberá, Pablo , Ning Wang , Richard Bonneau , John T. Jost , Jonathan Nagler , Joshua Tucker , and Sandra González-Bailón
    2015 “The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests”. PLoS ONE, 10(11): e0143611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143611
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143611 [Google Scholar]
  8. Billig, Michael
    1987Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1991Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Block, Jack , and Jeanne H. Block
    2006 “Nursery School Personality and Political Orientation Two Decades Later.” Journal of Research in Personality40: 734–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brady, William , Julian Wills , John T. Jost , Joshua Tucker , and Jay Van Bavel
    2017 “Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114: 7313–7318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618923114
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cichocka, Aleksandra , Michał Bilewicz , John T. Jost , Natasza Marrouch , and Marta Witkowska
    2016 “On the Grammar of Politics – or Why Conservatives Prefer Nouns.” Political Psychology37: 799–815. doi: 10.1111/pops.12327
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12327 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clifford, Scott , and Jennifer Jerit
    2013 “How Words do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research.” The Journal of Politics75: 659–671. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000492
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000492 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carney, Dana R. , John T. Jost , Samuel D. Gosling , and Jeff Potter
    2008 “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology29: 807–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2008.00668.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Condor, Susan , Cristian Tileaga , and Michael Billig
    2013 “Political Rhetoric.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. by Leonie Huddy , David O. Sears , and Jack S. Levy , 262–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Conover, Pamela Johnston , and Stanley Feldman
    1981 “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science: 617–645. doi: 10.2307/2110756
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2110756 [Google Scholar]
  17. Durrheim, Kevin , and John Dixon
    2005 “Studying Talk and Embodied Practices: Toward a Psychology of Materiality of ‘Race Relations’.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology15: 446–460. doi: 10.1002/casp.839
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.839 [Google Scholar]
  18. Enelow, James M. , and Melvin J. Hinich
    1984The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Evans, Geoffrey , Anthony Heath , and Mansur Lalljee
    1996 “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.” British Journal of Sociology: 93–112. doi: 10.2307/591118
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591118 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse as Social Interaction, ed. By Teun A. van Dijk , 258–84. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Federico, Christopher M. , and Paul Goren
    2009 “Motivated Social Cognition and Ideology: Is Attention to Elite Discourse a Prerequisite for Epistemically Motivated Political Affinities.” InSocial and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, ed. by John T. Jost , Aaron C. Kay , and Hulda Thorisdottir , 267–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Federico, Christopher M. , Christopher R. Weber , Damla Ergun , and Corrie Hunt
    2013 “Mapping the Connections Between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition.” Political Psychology34: 589–610. doi: 10.1111/pops.12006
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fowler, Roger , and Gunther Kress
    1979 “Critical Linguistics.” InLanguage and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler , Bob Hodge , Gunther Kress , and Tony Trew , 185–213. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fraley, R. Chris , Brian N. Griffin , Jay Belsky , and Glenn I. Roisman
    2012 “Developmental Antecedents of Political Ideology: A Longitudinal Investigation from Birth to Age 18 Years.” Psychological Science23: 1425–1431. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440102 [Google Scholar]
  25. Freeden, Michael
    1998 “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?.” Political Studies46: 748–765. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9248.00165
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00165 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerber, Alan S. , Gregory A. Huber , David Doherty , Conor M. Dowling , and Shang E. Ha
    2010 “Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships Across Issue Domains and Political Contexts.” American Political Science Review104: 111–133. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031 [Google Scholar]
  27. Graham, Jesse , Jonathan Haidt , and Brian A. Nosek
    2009 “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96: 1029–1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haidt, Jonathan
    2001 “The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review108, 814–834. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.108.4.814
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haidt, Jonathan , and Jesse Graham
    2007 “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research20: 98–116. doi: 10.1007/s11211‑007‑0034‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z [Google Scholar]
  30. Hirsh, Jacob B. , Colin G. DeYoung , Xiaowen Xu , and Jordan B. Peterson
    2010 “Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with Political Ideology and Moral Values.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36: 655–664. doi: 10.1177/0146167210366854
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366854 [Google Scholar]
  31. Homer-Dixon, Thomas , Jonathan Leader Maynard , Matto Mildenberger , Manjana Milkoreit , Steven J. Mock , Stephen Quilley , Tobias Schröder , and Paul Thagard
    2013 “A Complex Systems Approach to the Study of Ideology: Cognitive-Affective Structures and the Dynamics of Belief Systems.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology1: 337–363. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.36
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.36 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobson, Daniel
    2008 “Does Social Intuitionism Flatter Morality or Challenge it.” InMoral Psychology: The Cognitive Science of Morality, ed. by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong , 219–232. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, Kevin L. , Sharareh Noorbaloochi , John T. Jost , Richard Bonneau , Jonathan Nagler , and Joshua A. Tucker
    . 2017. “Liberal and Conservative Values: What we can Learn from Congressional Tweets.” Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12415 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jost, John T.
    2006 “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist61: 651–670. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.61.7.651
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2012 “Left and Right, Right and Wrong.” Science337: 525–526. doi: 10.1126/science.1222565
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222565 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jost, J. T.
    2017 “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology, 38: 167–208. doi: 10.1111/pops.12407
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jost, John T. , Christopher M. Federico , and Jaime L. Napier
    2009 “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology60: 307–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2013 “Political Ideologies and Their Social Psychological Functions.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, ed. by Michael Freeden , Lyman Tower Sargent , and Marc Stears , 232–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jost, John T. , Brian A. Nosek , and Samuel D. Gosling
    2008, “Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology.” Perspectives on Psychological Science3: 126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2008.00070.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Kandler, Christian , Wiebke Bleidorn , and Rainer Riemann
    2012 “Left or Right? Sources of Political Orientation: The Roles of Genetic Factors, Cultural Transmission, Assortative Mating, and Personality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102: 633–645. doi: 10.1037/a0025560
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560 [Google Scholar]
  41. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identifies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kugler, Matthew , John T. Jost , and Sharareh Noorbaloochi
    2014 “Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?.” Social Justice Research27: 413–431. doi: 10.1007/s11211‑014‑0223‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5 [Google Scholar]
  43. Leone, Luigi , Stefano Livi , and Antonio Chirumbolo
    2015 “Political Involvement Moderates the Impact of Worldviews and Values on SDO and RWA.” European Journal of Social Psychology4: 418–427.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McAdams, Dan P.
    2008 “Life Story.” InThe Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McAdams, Dan P. , Michelle Albaugh , Emily Farber , Jennifer Daniels , Regina L. Logan , and Brad Olson
    2008 “Family Metaphors and Moral Intuitions: How Conservatives and Liberals Narrate their Lives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95: 978–990. doi: 10.1037/a0012650
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012650 [Google Scholar]
  46. Milojev, Petar , Danny Osborne , Lara M. Greaves , Joseph Bulbulia , Marc S. Wilson , Caitlin L. Davies , James H. Liu , and Chris G. Sibley
    2014 “Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures.” Social Justice Research27: 149–174. doi: 10.1007/s11211‑014‑0213‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mondak, Jeffery J.
    2010Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511761515
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761515 [Google Scholar]
  48. Moscovici, Serge
    1988 “Notes Towards a Description of Social Representations.” European Journal of Social Psychology18: 211–250. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nagel, Thomas
    2012 “The Taste for Being Moral.” New York Review of Books, December6issue, 40–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Neiman, Jayme L. , Frank J. Gonzalez , Kevin Wilkinson , Kevin B. Smith , and John R. Hibbing
    2016a “Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians.” Political Communication33: 212–240. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.969465
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.969465 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2016b “Corrigendum: Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word usage of Democratic and Republican politicians.” Political Communication33: 346–349. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1161349
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1161349 [Google Scholar]
  52. Newman, Matthew L. , Carla J. Groom , Lori D. Handelman , and James W. Pennebaker
    2008 “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes45: 211–236. doi: 10.1080/01638530802073712
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712 [Google Scholar]
  53. Poole, Keith T. , and Howard Rosenthal
    1985 “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science29: 357–384. doi: 10.2307/2111172
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111172 [Google Scholar]
  54. Prims, J. P. , Zachary Melton , and Matt Motyl
    . 2017. “Using Twitter to Understand Moral Differences Underlying Political Preferences in the 2016 US Presidential Primary.” InWhy Irrational Politics Appeals: Understanding the Allure of Trump ed. by M. Fitzduff .
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sidanius, Jim , and Felicia Pratto
    1999Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139175043
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sinn, Jeffrey S. , and Matthew W. Hayes
    2016 “Replacing the Moral Foundations: An Evolutionary‐Coalitional Theory of Liberal‐Conservative Differences.” Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12361
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12361 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pennebaker, James W. , and Lori D. Stone
    2003 “Words of Wisdom: Language Use Over the Life Span.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85: 291–301. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.85.2.291
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.291 [Google Scholar]
  58. Suhler, Christopher L. , and Patricia Churchland
    2011 “Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience23: 2103–2116. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21637
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21637 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tomkins, Silvan S.
    1965 “Affect and the Psychology of Knowledge.” InAffect, Cognition, and Personality: Empirical Studies, ed. by Silvan S. Solomon and Carroll E. Izard , 72–97. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies11: 115–140. doi: 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wan, Ching , Kim‐Pong Tam , and Chi‐Yue Chiu
    2010 “Intersubjective Cultural Representations Predicting Behaviour: The Case of Political Culture and Voting.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology13: 260–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑839X.2010.01318.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01318.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Webb, Eugene J. , Donald Thomas Campbell , Richard D. Schwartz , and Lee Sechrest
    1966Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilson, Glenn D.
    1973The Psychology of Conservatism. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, Bei
    2014 “Language and Gender in Congressional Speech.” Literary and Linguistic Computing29: 118–13. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqs073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs073 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): basic values; morality; political ideology; psycholinguistics; social cognition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error