1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper focuses on reader comments published in two online UK newspapers ( and ) in response to articles about one discreditable incident involving a far-right political leader. The concepts of articulation and fixation are used to examine how these readers engage with the politician’s actions using ethical categories. While readers build theoretical articulations between the politician’s actions and a generalised crisis of confidence in politics, readers of the , regardless of their political sympathies, accept ethical categories as fixed points to anchor the discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17035.bre
2018-08-14
2019-08-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arendholtz, Jenny
    2013(In)appropriate Online Behaviour: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.229
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.229 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, Allan
    2011 “Reconstructing Babel: discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the interpretive arc.” Discourse Studies13 (5): 519–568. 10.1177/1461445611412699
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611412699 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bingham, A., and Mark Conboy
    2015Tabloid century: the popular press in Britain, 1896 to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.3726/978‑3‑0353‑0700‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0700-9 [Google Scholar]
  4. Canning, Patricia
    2018 “ ‘No ordinary crowd’: foregrounding a ‘hooligan schema’ in the construction of witness narratives following the Hillsborough Football Stadium disaster.” Discourse & Society29 (3): 237–255. 10.1177/0957926517734665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734665 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin de Cleen
    2007 “Bringing discourse theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics6 (2): 265–293. 10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahlgren, Peter
    2005 “The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation.” Political Communication22: 147–162. 10.1080/10584600590933160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160 [Google Scholar]
  7. Downs, William
    2012Political extremism in democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137052834
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137052834 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, Norman
    2003Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeden, Michael
    2017 “After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies22 (1): 1. 11. doi:  10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813 [Google Scholar]
  10. FT View
    FT View 2016 The fight for Britain’s working class. Financial Times. 1Decemberhttps://www.ft.com/content/b85bbbe4-b7d8-11e6-961e-a1acd97f622d
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge: London. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2008 ”Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations.” Political Studies Review6: 155–169. 10.1111/j.1478‑9302.2008.00149.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00149.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips
    2002Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208871
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelsey, Darren
    2015 “Discourse, affect and surveillance: gender conflict in the omniopticon.” Journalism and Discourse Studies1 (2): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelsey, Darren, and Bennett, Lucy
    2014 Discipline and resistance on social media. Discourse, Context & Media3, 37–45. 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
    2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4), 566–58110.1075/jlp.17028.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz [Google Scholar]
  17. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Littler, Mark, and Matthew Feldman
    2017 “Social media and the cordon sanitaire.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 510–522. 10.1075/jlp.17029.lit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17029.lit [Google Scholar]
  21. Macintyre, Alasdair
    1981After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2016The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford University Press, Stanford. 10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mudde, Cas
    2016 “Europe’s populist surge.” Foreign Affairs95 (6): 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Prins, Baukje
    2004Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rear, David, and Alan Jones
    2013 “Discursive struggle and contested signifiers in the arenas of education policy and work skills in Japan.” Critical Policy Studies7 (4): 375–394. 10.1080/19460171.2013.843469
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.843469 [Google Scholar]
  26. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The discourse-historical approach.” InMethods of critical discourse analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richet, Bertrand
    2013 “Fanning the flames? A study of insult forums on the Internet.” InAspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. byDenis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 223–240. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Standing, Guy
    2016The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    1999Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thomassen, Lasse
    2017British multiculturalism and the politics of representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422659.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422659.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Unger, Johann, Ruth Wodak, and Majid KhosraviNik
    2016 “Critical discourse studies and social media data.” InQualitative Research, ed. byDavid Silverman, 227–293. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Brussel, Leen
    2018 “The right to die. A Belgian case-study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society40 (3): 381–396. 10.1177/0163443717718255
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717718255 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wodak, Ruth
    2008 “Introduction.” InQualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4_1 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2015The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2017 “Right-wing populism in Europe and USA.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
  36. Wheeler, Mark
    2013Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yardi, Sarita, and Danah Boyd
    2010 Dynamic debates. An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30 (5): 316–327. 10.1177/0270467610380011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zienkowski, Jan
    2014 “Articulating metalinguistic and political awareness in Flemish discourses on integration and allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies19 (3): 283–306. 10.1080/13569317.2014.951146
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.951146 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17035.bre
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): articulation , political discourse , political logics and reader comments
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error