Fixing points on a shifting landscape

References

1. Arendholtz, Jenny
   2013 (In)appropriate Online Behaviour: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.229
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.229 [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, Allan
   2011 “Reconstructing Babel: discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the interpretive arc.” Discourse Studies13 (5): 519–568. 10.1177/1461445611412699
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611412699 [Google Scholar]
3. Bingham, A., and Mark Conboy
   2015 Tabloid century: the popular press in Britain, 1896 to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.3726/978‑3‑0353‑0700‑9
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0700-9 [Google Scholar]
4. Canning, Patricia
   2018 “ ‘No ordinary crowd’: foregrounding a ‘hooligan schema’ in the construction of witness narratives following the Hillsborough Football Stadium disaster.” Discourse & Society29 (3): 237–255. 10.1177/0957926517734665
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734665 [Google Scholar]
5. Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin de Cleen
   2007 “Bringing discourse theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics6 (2): 265–293. 10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car [Google Scholar]
6. Dahlgren, Peter
   2005 “The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation.” Political Communication22: 147–162. 10.1080/10584600590933160
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160 [Google Scholar]
7. Downs, William
   2012 Political extremism in democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137052834
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137052834 [Google Scholar]
8. Fairclough, Norman
   2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
9. Freeden, Michael
   2017 “After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies22 (1): 1. 11. doi:  10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813 [Google Scholar]
10. FT View
    FT View 2016 The fight for Britain’s working class. Financial Times. 1Decemberhttps://www.ft.com/content/b85bbbe4-b7d8-11e6-961e-a1acd97f622d
    [Google Scholar]
11. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge: London. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
12. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2008 ”Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations.” Political Studies Review6: 155–169. 10.1111/j.1478‑9302.2008.00149.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00149.x [Google Scholar]
13. Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips
    2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208871
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871 [Google Scholar]
14. Kelsey, Darren
    2015 “Discourse, affect and surveillance: gender conflict in the omniopticon.” Journalism and Discourse Studies1 (2): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kelsey, Darren, and Bennett, Lucy
    2014 Discipline and resistance on social media. Discourse, Context & Media3, 37–45. 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
16. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
    2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4), 566–58110.1075/jlp.17028.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz [Google Scholar]
17. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    2001 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Littler, Mark, and Matthew Feldman
    2017 “Social media and the cordon sanitaire.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 510–522. 10.1075/jlp.17029.lit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17029.lit [Google Scholar]
21. Macintyre, Alasdair
    1981 After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2016 The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford University Press, Stanford. 10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Mudde, Cas
    2016 “Europe’s populist surge.” Foreign Affairs95 (6): 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Prins, Baukje
    2004 Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rear, David, and Alan Jones
    2013 “Discursive struggle and contested signifiers in the arenas of education policy and work skills in Japan.” Critical Policy Studies7 (4): 375–394. 10.1080/19460171.2013.843469
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.843469 [Google Scholar]
26. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The discourse-historical approach.” InMethods of critical discourse analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Richet, Bertrand
    2013 “Fanning the flames? A study of insult forums on the Internet.” InAspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. byDenis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 223–240. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Standing, Guy
    2016 The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    1999 Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Thomassen, Lasse
    2017 British multiculturalism and the politics of representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422659.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422659.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Unger, Johann, Ruth Wodak, and Majid KhosraviNik
    2016 “Critical discourse studies and social media data.” InQualitative Research, ed. byDavid Silverman, 227–293. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Van Brussel, Leen
    2018 “The right to die. A Belgian case-study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society40 (3): 381–396. 10.1177/0163443717718255
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717718255 [Google Scholar]
33. Wodak, Ruth
    2008 “Introduction.” InQualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4_1 [Google Scholar]
34. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
35. Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2017 “Right-wing populism in Europe and USA.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
36. Wheeler, Mark
    2013 Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Yardi, Sarita, and Danah Boyd
    2010 Dynamic debates. An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30 (5): 316–327. 10.1177/0270467610380011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011 [Google Scholar]
38. Zienkowski, Jan
    2014 “Articulating metalinguistic and political awareness in Flemish discourses on integration and allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies19 (3): 283–306. 10.1080/13569317.2014.951146
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.951146 [Google Scholar]