Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics

References

1. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
   2006 Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511617881
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
2. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
3. Bublitz, Wolfram
   2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-communicative Act”. InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110427561‑002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
4. Burridge, Kate
   2012 “Euphemism and Language Change. The Sixth and Seven Ages”. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology7: 65–92.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cameron, Deborah
   2012 Verbal Hygiene. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203123898
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123898 [Google Scholar]
6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:  10.1057/9780230000612
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
7. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2012 “Forensic Deliberations on ‘Purposeful Metaphor’”. Metaphor and the Social World2 (1): 1–21. doi:  10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha [Google Scholar]
8. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2014 Analysing Political Speeches. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
9. Chilton, Paul
   2004 Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
10. Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
    2002 “Introduction. Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse”. InPolitics in Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. byPeter Chilton, and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi [Google Scholar]
11. Cox, Jeremy L.
    2012 “Politics in Motion: Barack Obama’s Use of Movement Metaphors”. American Communication Journal14 (2): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    2014 “Euphemism and Political Discourse in the British Regional Press”. Brno Studies in English40 (1): 5–26. doi:  10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑1
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-1 [Google Scholar]
13. Degani, Marta
    2015 Framing the Rhetoric of a Leader: An Analysis of Obama’s Election Campaign Speeches. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137471598
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137471598 [Google Scholar]
14. Grady, Joseph E.
    1997 “Theories are Buildings Revisited”. Cognitive Linguistics8 (4): 267–290. doi:  10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267 [Google Scholar]
15. Halmari, Helena
    2011 “Political Correctness, Euphemism and Language Change. The Case of ‘People First’”. Journal of Pragmatics43 (3): 828–840. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.016 [Google Scholar]
16. Kahn, Paul
    1997 The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2013 “Strategic Manoeuvring in the Political Rhetoric of Barack Obama”. Journal of Language and Politics12 (3): 357–377. doi:  10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie [Google Scholar]
18. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2006 Language, Mind, and Culture. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2013 “Policy, Policy Communication and Discursive Shifts: Analysing EU Policy Discourses on Climate Change”. InAnalysing New Genres in Political Communication, ed. byPiotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska, 101–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/dapsac.50.05krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.05krz [Google Scholar]
20. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Bernard Forchtner
    2016 “Theories and Concepts in Critical Discourse Studies: Facing Challenges, Moving beyond Foundations”. Discourse and Society7 (3): 253–261. doi:  10.1177/0957926516630900
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630900 [Google Scholar]
21. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. doi:  10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lutz, William
    1987 “Doublespeak at Large”. English Today12: 21–24. doi:  10.1017/S0266078400003072
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400003072 [Google Scholar]
24. Machin, David
    2013 “What is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies?” Critical Discourse Studies10: 347–355. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770 [Google Scholar]
25. Musolff, Andreas
    2014 “The Metaphor of the ‘Body Politic’ across Languages and Cultures”. InCognitive Explorations into Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. byFrank Polzenhagen, Zoltán Kövecses, Stefanie Vogelbacher, and Sonjia Kleinke, 85–99. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Musolff, Andreas
    2016 Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Okulska, Urszula, and Piotr Cap
    2010 “Analysis of Political Discourse: Landmarks, Challenges and Prospects”. InPerspectives in Political Discourse, ed. byUrszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/dapsac.36.03oku
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.36.03oku [Google Scholar]
28. Partington, Alan
    2003 The Linguistics of Political Argument. The Spin-doctor and the Wolf-pack at the White House. London and New York: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203218259
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218259 [Google Scholar]
29. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2015 “The Discourse-historical Approach (DHA)”. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Reyes, Antonio
    2014 “Bush, Obama: (In)formality as Persuasion in Political Discourse”. Journal of Language and Politics13 (3): 538–562. doi:  10.1075/jlp.13.3.08rey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.3.08rey [Google Scholar]
31. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J.
    2000 “The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy”. InMetaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, ed. byAntonio Barcelona, 109–132. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schubert, Christoph
    2014 “Cognitive Categorization and Prototypicality as Persuasive Strategies: Presidential Rhetoric in the USA”. Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse. Special Issue of Journal of Language and Politics13 (2): 313–335. doi:  10.1075/jlp.13.2.06sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.06sch [Google Scholar]
33. Shin, Yongjun
    2016 “Connecting Political Communication with Urban Politics: A Bourdieusian Framework”. International Journal of Communication10: 508–529.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” InPolitical Linguistics, ed. byJan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Politics, Ideology, and Discourse”. InElsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. byRuth Wodak, 728–740. London: Elsevier. doi:  10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00722‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7 [Google Scholar]
36. Wilson, John
    2001 “Political Discourse”. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 398–416. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2015 “Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology”. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–22. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Yu, Ning
    2008 “Metaphor from Body and Culture”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. byRaymond W. Gibbs, 247–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CB09780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]
39. Zarefsky, David
    (ed) 2014 Political Argumentation in the United States. Historical and Contemporary Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]