1887
Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article analyses the rhetoric of speeches delivered by British politicians at televised national HMD commemorations. Following the recommendation of the Stockholm International Forum, since 2001, Britain has commemorated victims of the Holocaust and subsequent genocides every 27 January. The television broadcasts of the national commemoration both reflect and illuminate the complex processes of (national) histories, individual memory and collective remembrance, and the ways that they mediate and interact with each other in social and historic contexts. In addition to other genres (e.g. music, poetry readings, archival film), a speech is delivered by a prominent politician at each of these ceremonies. I argue that these speeches are examples of epideictic oratory, which provide politicians with the opportunity to communicate an understanding of the Holocaust as a catastrophe and a great affront to . My rhetorical analysis focuses on the ways that politicians utilize two artistic means of persuasion: strategies, which place emphasis on their personal character; and strategies, which aim to persuade through invoking arguments. I orientate to the ways that poorly selected and strategies can disrupt the primary purpose of the epideictic speech: to communicate, and revivify, shared values.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17066.ric
2018-07-20
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, Göran
    2000 Selective Perceptions: The Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust. Patterns of Prejudice, 34(3): 65–71.10.1080/00313220008559147
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220008559147 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwork, Larissa
    2015Holocaust Remembrance between the National and the Transnational: The Stockholm International Forum and the First Decade of the International Task Force. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristotle
    Aristotle 2007On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (Translated with Introduction, Notes, and Appendices by George A. Kennedy , 2nd Edition). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Yahuda
    2002Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010The Death of the Shtetl. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, Doris L.
    2012 Studying the Holocaust: Is Commemoration History?InThe Holocaust and Historical Methodology, edited by Dan Stone , 158–177. New York/London: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Billig, Michael
    1995Banal Nationalism. London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Billig, Michael and Marinho, Cristina
    2017The Politics and Rhetoric of Commemoration: How the Portuguese Parliament Celebrates the 1974 Revolution. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cole, Tim
    2000Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is bought, packaged and sold. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Condit, Celeste M.
    1985 The functions of epideictic: The Boston Massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 284–299.10.1080/01463378509369608
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369608 [Google Scholar]
  11. Confino, Alon
    1997 Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method. The American Historical Review, 102(5): 1386–1403.10.2307/2171069
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2171069 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2005 Remembering the Second World War, 1945–1965: Narratives of Victimhood and Genocide. Cultural Analysis4: 46–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duffy, Bernard K.
    1983 The Platonic functions of epideictic rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 16(2): 79–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Elder-Vass, Dave
    2012The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9781139169202
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169202 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2015 Collective Intentionality and Causal Powers. Journal of Social Ontology1(2): 251–269.10.1515/jso‑2014‑0039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0039 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ensink, Titus and Sauer, Christoph
    2003 A discourse analytic approach to the commemorative speeches about the Warsaw Uprising. InThe Art of Commemoration. Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, edited by Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer , 19–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishers.10.1075/dapsac.7.03ens
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.7.03ens [Google Scholar]
  17. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2016Lessons from the Past? Memory, Narrativity and Subjectivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978‑1‑137‑48322‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48322-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fortenbaugh, William W.
    1996 Aristotle’s accounts of persuasion through character. InTheory, Text, Context: Issues in Greek Rhetoric and Oratory, edited by Christopher L. Johnstone , 147–168. New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hauser, Gerard A.
    1999 Aristotle on epideictic: The formation of public morality. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 29(1): 5–23.10.1080/02773949909391135
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02773949909391135 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hyde, Michael J.
    2005 The rhetor as hero and the pursuit of truth: The case of 9/11. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 8(1): 1–30.10.1353/rap.2005.0043
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2005.0043 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kampf, Zohar and Katriel, Tamar
    2017 Political Condemnations: Public Speech Acts and the Moralization of Discourse. InThe Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh , 312–324. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kansteiner, Wolf
    2002 Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies. History and Theory41(2): 179–197.10.1111/0018‑2656.00198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00198 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kennedy, George A.
    2007 Introduction. InAristotle (2007) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (Translated with Introduction, Notes, and Appendices by G. A. Kennedy , 2nd Edition), 1–25. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lausberg, Heinrich
    1998Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Levy, Daniel and Sznaider, Natan
    2005The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. London, Louise
    2000 Whitehall and the Refugees: The 1930s and the 1990s. Patterns of Prejudice, 34(3): 17–26.10.1080/00313220008559144
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220008559144 [Google Scholar]
  27. Macdonald, Sharon
    2005 Commemorating the Holocaust: Reconfiguring National Identity in the Twenty-First Century. InThe Politics of Heritage: The Legacies of ‘Race’, edited by Jo Littler and Roshi Naidoo , 49–68. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marrus, Michael R.
    2015Lessons of the Holocaust. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Michman, Dan
    2003Holocaust Historiography: A Jewish Perspective. London: Vallentine Mitchell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2008 Is there an ‘Israeli School’ of Holocaust Research?InHolocaust Historiography in Context: Emergences, Challenges, Polemics and Achievements, edited by David Bankier and Dan Michman , 37–65. Jerusalem: Yad Vashem / New York: Berghahn Books 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Montgomery, Martin
    1999 Speaking sincerely: public reactions to the death of Diana. Language and Literature, Vol8(1): 5–33.10.1177/096394709900800101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800101 [Google Scholar]
  32. Moscovici, Serge
    1988 Notes towards a description of Social Representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3): 211–250.10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303 [Google Scholar]
  33. Olson, Kathryn M.
    2013 An epideictic dimension of symbolic violence in Disney’s Beauty and the Beast: Inter-generational lessons in romanticizing and tolerating intimate partner violence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 99(4), 448–480.10.1080/00335630.2013.835491
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2013.835491 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pearce, Andy
    2013 Britain’s Holocaust Memorial Day: Inculcating ‘British’ or ‘European’ Holocaust Consciousness?InBritain and the Holocaust Remembering and Representing War and Genocide, edited by Caroline Sharples and Olaf Jensen , 190–211. Houndmills: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014Holocaust consciousness in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
    1969The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Perelman, Chaim
    1982The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pernot, Laurent
    2015Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Petersoo, Pille
    2007 What does ‘we” mean?Journal of Language and Politics, 6, 419–436.10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet [Google Scholar]
  40. Richardson, John E.
    2007Analysing Newspapers: An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave.10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20968‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017 Making memory makers: Interpellation, norm circles and Holocaust Memorial Day Trust workshops. Memory StudiesiFirst1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richardson, John
    2018a Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as Epideictic rhetoric. Discourse & CommunicationiFirst1–21 doi: 10.1177/1750481317745743
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745743 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2018b Mediating National History and Personal Catastrophe: Televising Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration. Fudan Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceiFirst doi: 10.1007/s40647‑017‑0209‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0209-4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sauer, Christoph
    2012 Multimodality and performance: Britain’s first Holocaust Memorial Day. InDialogue in Politics, edited by Lawrence N. Berlin and Anita Fetzer , 241–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.18.16sau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.18.16sau [Google Scholar]
  45. Schuster, Liz and Solomos, John
    2004 Race, Immigration and Asylum: New Labour’s agenda and its consequences. Ethnicities4(2): 267–287.10.1177/1468796804042606
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796804042606 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shaw, Martin
    2011 Britain and genocide: historical and contemporary parameters of national responsibility. Review of International Studies, 37, pp2417–2438.10.1017/S0260210510001245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001245 [Google Scholar]
  47. Slavíčková, Tess
    2013 The rhetoric of remembrance: Presidential Memorial Day speeches. Discourse & Society24(3): 361–379.10.1177/0957926512471762
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512471762 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2014 Oratorical Style and Performance in the Epideictic Speeches Of American Presidents. Brno Studies in English40(1): 227–241.10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑11
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-11 [Google Scholar]
  49. Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca
    2002 Clues for reconstructing symptomatic argumentation. InAdvances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren , 197–214. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stone, Dan
    2000 Day of Remembrance or Day of Forgetting? Or, Why Britain Does Not Need a Holocaust Memorial Day. Patterns of Prejudice, 34(4): 53–59.10.1080/003132200128810991
    https://doi.org/10.1080/003132200128810991 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tileagă, Cristian
    2008 What is a ‘revolution’? National commemoration, collective memory and managing authenticity in the representation of a political event. Discourse & Society, 19(3): 359–382.10.1177/0957926508088965
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088965 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2009 The social organization of representations of history: The textual accomplishment of coming to terms with the past. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48: 337–355.10.1348/014466608X349487
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X349487 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob
    1992Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca
    2002Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , and Houtlosser, Peter
    2002 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance. InDialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser , 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_10 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vatnoey, Eirik
    2015 Leaders’ Response to Terrorism: The Role of Epideictic Rhetoric in Deliberative Democracies. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(2), Article 5, available at: www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol11/iss2/art5
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodak, Ruth and De Cillia, Rudolf
    2007 Commemorating the past: the discursive construction of official narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’. Discourse & Communication, 1(3): 337–363.10.1177/1750481307079206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307079206 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wodak, Ruth , de Cillia, Rudolph , Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin
    1999The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17066.ric
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17066.ric
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): commemoration , epideictic , Holocaust Memorial Day , persuasion , rhetoric and values
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error