Sensitive economic personae and functional human beings

References

1. Arendt, Hannah, and Margaret Canovan
   1998 The Human Condition. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Arrese, Ángel, and Alfonso Vara-Miguel
   2016 “A comparative study of metaphors in press reporting of the Euro crisis.” Discourse and Society27(2): 133–155. 10.1177/0957926515611552
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611552 [Google Scholar]
3. Bickes, Hans, Tina Otten, and Laura Chelsea Weymann
   2014 “The financial crisis in the German and English press: Metaphorical structures in the media coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy.” Discourse and Society25(4): 424–445. 10.1177/0957926514536956
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536956 [Google Scholar]
4. Barbé, Esther, Anna Herranz-Surrallés and Michał Natorski
   2015 “Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor: Norms and power in the European discourse on multilateralism.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 18–40. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar [Google Scholar]
5. Carta, Caterina, and Ruth Wodak
   2015 “Discourse analysis, policy analysis, and the borders of EU identity.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 1–17. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car [Google Scholar]
6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
7. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2006 “Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign.” Discourse and Society17(5): 563–581. 10.1177/0957926506066345
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345 [Google Scholar]
8. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2012 “Forensic deliberations on ‘purposeful metaphor’.” Metaphor and the Social World2(1): 1–21. 10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha [Google Scholar]
9. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2017 “Competition Metaphors and Ideology: Life as a Race.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. byR. Wodak and B. Forchtner. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑16
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-16 [Google Scholar]
10. Chilton, Paul
    1996 Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dewandre, Nicole
    2018 “Political Agents as Relational Selves: Rethinking EU Politics and Policy-Making with Hannah Arendt.” Philosophy Today62(2). 10.5840/philtoday2018612222
    https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2018612222 [Google Scholar]
12. Fairclough, Norman
    1989 Language and Power. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    2011 “Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate?: A question of human consciousness and action.” Metaphor and the Social World1(1): 26–52. 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
14. Harvey, David
    2005 A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Holborow, Marnie
    2015 Language and Neoliberalism. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718163
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718163 [Google Scholar]
16. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Ruth Wodak
    2011 “Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy.” Language Policy10(2): 115–136. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9196‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5 [Google Scholar]
17. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2015 “International leadership re-/constructed? Ambivalence and heterogeneity of identity discourses in EU policy on climate change.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 110–133. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.06krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.06krz [Google Scholar]
18. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse and Society27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
19. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2018 “Social media in/and the politics of the European Union Politico-organizational communication, institutional cultures and self-inflicted elitism.” Journal of Language and Politics17(2): 281–304. 10.1075/jlp.18001.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18001.krz [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. 2003 ed.University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lakoff, George
    1992 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought (second edition), ed. byAndrew Ortony. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe
    (eds) 2009 The Road from Mont Pelerin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674054264
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054264 [Google Scholar]
23. Musolff, Andreas
    2000 “Political Imagery of Europe: a house without exit doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development21(3): 216–229. 10.1080/01434630008666402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666402 [Google Scholar]
24. Steen, Gerard J.
    2008 “The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol23(4): 213–241. 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
25. Straehle, Carolyn et al.
    1999 “Struggle as Metaphor in European Union Discourses on Unemployment.” Discourse and Society10(1): 67–99. 10.1177/0957926599010001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001004 [Google Scholar]
26. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society4(2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
27. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse1: 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Ideology and discourse analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2): 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
29. Wodak, Ruth
    2002 “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Lingustik36: 5–31.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wodak, Ruth
    2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]