1887
Volume 17, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study is aimed at unveiling the implicit assumptions underlying the language of EU policy-making, drawing on Hannah Arendt’s critique of modernity. It conducts a critical metaphor analysis of strategic EU policy documents from 1985 to 2014 to reveal the extent to which EU policy-making, by relentlessly focusing on the ‘competitiveness, growth, and jobs’ narrative, relies on modern conceptual frameworks. These are characterized by the prominence of rationality and causality, at the expense of sense of purpose, reality and meaning, which is revealed through the validation of four metaphorical keys. These are (i) , i.e. and ; (ii) , i.e. and ; (iii) , i.e. and ; and (iv) , i.e. and .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17068.dew
2018-12-14
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah, and Margaret Canovan
    1998The Human Condition. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrese, Ángel, and Alfonso Vara-Miguel
    2016 “A comparative study of metaphors in press reporting of the Euro crisis.” Discourse and Society27(2): 133–155. 10.1177/0957926515611552
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611552 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickes, Hans, Tina Otten, and Laura Chelsea Weymann
    2014 “The financial crisis in the German and English press: Metaphorical structures in the media coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy.” Discourse and Society25(4): 424–445. 10.1177/0957926514536956
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536956 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbé, Esther, Anna Herranz-Surrallés and Michał Natorski
    2015 “Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor: Norms and power in the European discourse on multilateralism.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 18–40. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar [Google Scholar]
  5. Carta, Caterina, and Ruth Wodak
    2015 “Discourse analysis, policy analysis, and the borders of EU identity.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 1–17. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2006 “Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign.” Discourse and Society17(5): 563–581. 10.1177/0957926506066345
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2012 “Forensic deliberations on ‘purposeful metaphor’.” Metaphor and the Social World2(1): 1–21. 10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017 “Competition Metaphors and Ideology: Life as a Race.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. byR. Wodak and B. Forchtner. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-16 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, Paul
    1996Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dewandre, Nicole
    2018 “Political Agents as Relational Selves: Rethinking EU Politics and Policy-Making with Hannah Arendt.” Philosophy Today62(2). 10.5840/philtoday2018612222
    https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2018612222 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    2011 “Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate?: A question of human consciousness and action.” Metaphor and the Social World1(1): 26–52. 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  14. Harvey, David
    2005A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holborow, Marnie
    2015Language and Neoliberalism. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718163
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718163 [Google Scholar]
  16. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Ruth Wodak
    2011 “Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy.” Language Policy10(2): 115–136. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9196‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2015 “International leadership re-/constructed? Ambivalence and heterogeneity of identity discourses in EU policy on climate change.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 110–133. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.06krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.06krz [Google Scholar]
  18. 2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse and Society27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018 “Social media in/and the politics of the European Union Politico-organizational communication, institutional cultures and self-inflicted elitism.” Journal of Language and Politics17(2): 281–304. 10.1075/jlp.18001.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18001.krz [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. 2003 ed.University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lakoff, George
    1992 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought (second edition), ed. byAndrew Ortony. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe
    (eds) 2009The Road from Mont Pelerin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674054264
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054264 [Google Scholar]
  23. Musolff, Andreas
    2000 “Political Imagery of Europe: a house without exit doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development21(3): 216–229. 10.1080/01434630008666402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666402 [Google Scholar]
  24. Steen, Gerard J.
    2008 “The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol23(4): 213–241. 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  25. Straehle, Carolyn et al.
    1999 “Struggle as Metaphor in European Union Discourses on Unemployment.” Discourse and Society10(1): 67–99. 10.1177/0957926599010001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society4(2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse1: 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2006 “Ideology and discourse analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2): 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wodak, Ruth
    2002 “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Lingustik36: 5–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2009The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17068.dew
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17068.dew
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical discourse analysis , European Union , Hannah Arendt , Lisbon strategy , metaphor and policy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error