Public administration in transition

References

1. Almqvist, Roland M.
   2001 “’Management by contract’: a study of programmatic and technological aspects.” Public Administration – an international quarterly79 (3): 689–706. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9299.00275
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00275 [Google Scholar]
2. Arnaboldi, Michela, Irvine Lapsley, and Ileana Steccolini
   2015 “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” Financial Accountability & Management31 (1): 1–22. doi:  10.1111/faam.12049
   https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049 [Google Scholar]
3. Arnold, Gwen
   2013 “Street-level policy entrepreneurship.” Public Management Review17 (3): 307–327. doi:  10.1080/14719037.2013.806577
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806577 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Carolyn D.
   1984 “The “search for adultness”: Membership work in Adolescent-adult talk.” Human Studies7 (1): 301–323. doi:  10.1007/BF02633660
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02633660 [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, Carolyn D.
   2000 “Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk.” InCulture and text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies, edited byAlison Lee and Cate Poynton, 99–113. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barbour, Rosaline S.
   2001 [1999] “Are focus groups an appropriate tool for studying organizational change?” InDeveloping Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited byRosaline S. Barbour and Jenny Kitzinger, 114–127. London: Sage publications.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckman
   1967 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Berger, Peter, and Stanley Pullberg
   1966 “Reification and the Sociologial Critique of Consciousness.” The New Left Review35 (1): 56–71.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Laura Bloomberg
   2014 “Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review74 (4): 445–456. doi:  10.1111/puar.12238
   https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238 [Google Scholar]
10. Burke, Kenneth
    1966 Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method: Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cardoso, Sónia, Teresa Carvalho, and Rui Santiago
    2011 “From Students to Consumers: reflections on the marketisation of Portuguese higher education.” European Journal of Education46 (2): 271–284. doi:  10.1111/j.1465‑3435.2010.01447.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01447.x [Google Scholar]
12. Christensen, Tom, Amund Lie, and Per Lægreid
    2008 “Beyond new public management: agencification and regulatory reform in Norway.” Financial Accountability & Management24 (1): 15–30. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑0408.2008.00441.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00441.x [Google Scholar]
13. Clarke, John, Sharon Gewirtz, and Eugene McLaughlin
    eds. 2000a New Managerialism, New Welfare?London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clarke, John, Sharon Gewirtz, and Eugene McLaughlin
    2000b “Reinventing the Welfare State.” InNew Managerialism, New Welfare?, edited byJohn Clarke, Sharon Gewirtz and Eugene, 1–26. McLaughlin. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Clarke, John, and Janet Newman
    1997 The managerial state: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Deem, Rosemary
    1998 “’New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education8 (1): 47–70. doi:  10.1080/0962021980020014
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014 [Google Scholar]
17. Deem, Rosemary, and Kevin J. Brehony
    2005 “Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education.” Oxford Review of Education31 (2): 217–235. doi:  10.1080/03054980500117827
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980500117827 [Google Scholar]
18. Denhardt, Janet V., and Robert B. Denhardt
    2015 “The New Public Service Revisited.” Public Administration Review75 (5): 664–672. doi:  10.1111/puar.12347
    https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347 [Google Scholar]
19. Desmond, Elaine
    2017 “Risk definition and the struggle for legitimation: a case study of Bt cotton in Andhra Pradesh, India.” Journal of Risk Research20 (1): 135–150. doi:  10.1080/13669877.2015.1042504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1042504 [Google Scholar]
20. Doolin, Bill
    2001 “Doctors as managers: New Public Management in a New Zealand hospital.” Public Management Review3 (2): 231–254. doi:  10.1080/14616670010029601
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670010029601 [Google Scholar]
21. Eagleton, Terry
    1991 Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester
    2003 The Montreal masscre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fairclough, Norman
    1993 “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society4 (2): 133–168. doi:  10.1177/0957926593004002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002 [Google Scholar]
24. Fairclough, Norman
    1995 Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Language in social life series. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical discourse analysis.” InDiscourses as a Social Interaction, edited byTA Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fountain, Jane E.
    2001 “Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service.” Governance14 (1): 55–73. doi:  10.1111/0952‑1895.00151
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00151 [Google Scholar]
27. Frederickson, George H.
    1999 “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” Political Science and Politics32 (4): 701–711. doi:  10.2307/420159
    https://doi.org/10.2307/420159 [Google Scholar]
28. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gewirtz, Sharon, and Stephen Ball
    2000 “From ‘Welfarism’ to ‘New Managerialism’: Shifting discourses of school headship in the education marketplace.” Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education21 (3): 253–268. doi:  10.1080/713661162
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713661162 [Google Scholar]
30. Glenngård, Anna H.
    2016 “Experiences of Introducing a Quasi-Market in Swedish Primary Care: Fulfilment of Overall Objectives and Assessment of Provider Activities.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration20 (1): 71–86.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gore, Albert
    1993 From red tape to results: Creating a governmet that works better and costs less, report from the National Performance Review. Washington: US Government.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gore, Albert
    1994 Creating a government that works better & costs less. Summit, N.J.: Silicon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    eds. 1997 Culture in Action: Studies in membership categorization analysis, Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Washington: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Holmgren Caicedo, Mikael, Maria Mårtensson, and Kristina Tamm Hallström
    2017 “The development of the management accountant’s role revisited: An example from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.” Financial Accountability & Management. doi:  10.1111/faam.12156
    https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12156 [Google Scholar]
35. Hood, Christopher
    1991 “A public management for all seasons?” Public Administration6 (3): 3–19. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9299.1991.tb00779.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x [Google Scholar]
36. Hood, Christopher
    1995 “The ”new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society20 (2–3): 93–110. doi:  10.1016/0361‑3682(93)E0001‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W [Google Scholar]
37. Hood, Christopher
    2000 The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198297653.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297653.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Hood, Christopher, and Ruth Dixon
    2015 A government that worked better and cost less? : evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687022.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687022.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
39. Hyndman, Noel, and Irvine Lapsley
    2016 “New public management: The story continues.” Financial Accountability & Management32 (4): 385–408. doi:  10.1111/faam.12100
    https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12100 [Google Scholar]
40. Kaboolian, Linda
    1998 “The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate.” Public Administration Review58 (3): 189–193. 10.2307/976558
    https://doi.org/10.2307/976558 [Google Scholar]
41. Karlsson, Tom S.
    2014 Manager and Civil Servant: Exploring actors’ taken-for-granted assumptions in public administration. Lund: Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Karlsson, Tom S.
    2017a New Public Management: Ett nyliberalt 90-talsfenomen?Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Karlsson, Tom S.
    2017b “Shaping NPM: Social Democratic Values at Work.” InModernizing the Public Sector: Scandinavian Perspectives, edited byIrvine Lapsley and Hans Knutsson, 37–52. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Karlsson, Tom S.
    2019 “Searching for managerial discretion: How public managers engage managerialism as a rationalization for increased latitude of action.” Public Management Review21 (3): 315–333. doi:  10.1080/14719037.2018.1473475
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473475 [Google Scholar]
45. Keenoy, Tom, Cliff Oswick, and David Grant
    1997 “Organizational discourses: Text and context.” Organization4 (2): 147–157. doi:  10.1177/135050849742001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849742001 [Google Scholar]
46. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society27 (3): 308–321. doi:  10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
47. Lapsley, Irvine, and Peter Skærbæk
    2012 “Why the Public Sector Matters.” Financial Accountability & Management28 (4): 355–358. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑0408.2012.00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00550.x [Google Scholar]
48. Le Grand, Julian
    1991 “Quasi-Markets and Social Policy.” The Economic Journal101 (408): 1256–1267. doi:  10.2307/2234441
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2234441 [Google Scholar]
49. Lynch, Kathleen
    2006 “Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education.” European educational research journal5 (1): 1–17. doi:  10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1 [Google Scholar]
50. Mackerron, Gordon, and Frans Berkhout
    2009 “Learning to listen: institutional change and legitimation in UK radioactive waste policy.” Journal of Risk Research12 (7–8): 989–1008. doi:  10.1080/13669870903126085
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903126085 [Google Scholar]
51. Markóva, Ivana, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, and Anne Salazar Orvig
    2007 Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge. London: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2005 “The entrepreneurial university. A discursive profile of a higher education buzzword.” Critical Discourse Studies2 (2): 95–120. doi:  10.1080/17405900500283540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283540 [Google Scholar]
53. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2010 Language and the market society: Critical reflections on discourse and dominance: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855997
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855997 [Google Scholar]
54. Megginson, William L., and Jeffry M. Netter
    2001 “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature39 (2): 321–389. doi:  10.1257/jel.39.2.321
    https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321 [Google Scholar]
55. Milward, Brinton H., Keith G. Provan, and Barbara A. Else
    1993 “What does the ”Hollow State” look like?” InPublic Management: The state of the art, edited byBarry Bozeman, 309–322. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Modell, Sven
    2004 “Performance Measurement Myths In The Public Sector: A Research Note.” Financial Accountability & Management20 (1): 39–55. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑0408.2004.00185.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.x [Google Scholar]
57. Modell, Sven, and Fredrika Wiesel
    2008 “Marketization and Performance Measurement in Swedish Central Government: A Comparative Institutionalist Study.” Abacus44 (3): 251–251. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑6281.2008.00262.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00262.x [Google Scholar]
58. Morgan, David L.
    1996 “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology22:129–152. 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 [Google Scholar]
59. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler
    1992 Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spririt Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Osborne, Stephen
    2010 “Delivering Public Services: Time for a new Theory?” Public Management Review12 (1): 1–10. doi:  10.1080/14719030903495232
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030903495232 [Google Scholar]
61. Paroutis, Sotirios, Max Mckeown, and Simon Collinson
    2013 “Building castles from sand: Unlocking CEO mythopoetical behaviour in Hewlett Packard from 1978 to 2005.” Business History55 (7): 1200–1227. doi:  10.1080/00076791.2013.838038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.838038 [Google Scholar]
62. Paulsson, Gert
    2012 “The Role of Management Accountants in New Public Management.” Financial Accountability & Management28 (4): 378–394. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑0408.2012.00552.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00552.x [Google Scholar]
63. Pollitt, Christopher
    1993 Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s?2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Pollitt, Christopher
    2016 “Managerialism redux?” Financial Accountability & Management32 (4): 429–447. doi:  10.1111/faam.12094
    https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12094 [Google Scholar]
65. Pollitt, Christopher, and Sorin Dan
    2011 The impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A meta-analysis. COCOPS work package 1, Delivarable 1.1.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Power, Michael
    1997 The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rhodes, Rod A. W.
    1994 “The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain.” The Political Quarterly65 (2): 138–151. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑923X.1994.tb00441.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x [Google Scholar]
68. Sacks, Harvey
    1972a “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing Sociology.” InStudies in Social Interaction, edited byD. N. Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sacks, Harvey
    1972b “On the analyzability of stories by children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited byJ. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 325–345. New York: Hold, Rineheart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Edited byGail Jefferson. Vol.2, Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi:  10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
72. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 “A tutorial on membership categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics39:462–482. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
73. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2009 “Doing Actions with Identity Categories: Complaints and Denials in Neighbor Disputes.” Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies29 (1): 75–97. doi:  10.1515/TEXT.2009.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.004 [Google Scholar]
74. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2010 “I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women.” Discourse & Society21 (1): 59–82. doi:  10.1177/0957926509345072
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509345072 [Google Scholar]
75. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 “Moving forward with membership Categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.” Discourse Studies14 (3): 277–303. doi:  10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
76. Suddaby, Roy, and Royston Greenwood
    2005 “Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.” Administrative science quarterly50 (1): 35–67. doi:  10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35 [Google Scholar]
77. Uttley, Matthew
    1993 “Contracting-Out and Market-Testing in the UK Defence Sector: Theory, Evidence and Issues.” Public Money & Management13 (1): 55–60. doi:  10.1080/09540969309387750
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969309387750 [Google Scholar]
78. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication1 (1): 91–112. doi:  10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
79. Waring, Justin, and Simon Bishop
    2013 “McDonaldization or Commercial Re-stratification: Corporatization and the multimodal organisation of English doctors.” Social Science & Medicine82 (0): 147–155. doi:  10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.023 [Google Scholar]
80. Watson, D. R.
    1978 “Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation.” Sociology12 (1): 105–113. doi:  10.1177/003803857801200106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106 [Google Scholar]
81. Weber, Max
    1978 Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Vol.1: Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wilkinson, Sue
    2006 [1997] “Focus Group Reseach (sic!).” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited byDavid Silverman, 177–199. London: Sage publications.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Wynen, Jan, and Koen Verhoest
    2013 “Do NPM-Type Reforms Lead to a Cultural Revolution Within Public Sector Organizations?” Public Management Review17 (3): 356–379. doi:  10.1080/14719037.2013.841459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841459 [Google Scholar]
84. Zucker, Lynne G.
    1977 “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” American Sociological Review42 (5): 726–743. doi:  10.2307/2094862
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2094862 [Google Scholar]
85. Zucker, Lynne G.
    1991 “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” InThe New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited byWalter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 83–107. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Zuckerman, Miron, and Kathleen C. Gerbasi
    1977 “Dimensions of the I-E Scale and Their Relationship To other Personality Measures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement37:159–175. doi:  10.1177/001316447703700116
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700116 [Google Scholar]