1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper deals with the use of deliberate metaphors in the political discourse. The potential of dehumanising metaphors to create derogatory descriptions used to disparage one’s political opponents is analysed. Also, metaphorical descriptions prove to be very productive in creating polysemy in previously monosemous items which are used in a new capacity in order to create an effect of novelty and surprise. This function appears especially useful in the language of politics in general, and the language of British politics in particular. The paper is maintained within the methodological framework of cognitive linguistics, focusing on the theories of conceptual metaphor and conceptual metonymy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17073.pra
2019-02-13
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, Antonio
    2015 “Metonymy.” InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Dąbrowska, Ewa; Divjak, Dagmar. (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 143–159. 10.1515/9783110292022‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-008 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beger, Anke
    2011 “Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures.” Metaphorik.de20, 39–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chakelian, Anoosh
    2017 “The absolute boy and the melts: how Corbynism created a new political language.” Accessed29/10/2017. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/10/absolute-boy-and-melts-how-corbynism-created-new-political-language
  4. Costello, Kimberly and Gordon Hodson
    2010 “Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal-human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 3–22. 10.1177/1368430209347725
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2012 “Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice.” British Journal of Social Psychology 2014 Vol.53(1), 175–197. 10.1111/bjso.12016
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dancygier, Barbara and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2017 “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics28 (3), 565–598. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0074
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074 [Google Scholar]
  7. Forceville, Charles
    2007 “A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor.” Accessed15/11/2017semioticon.com/sio/courses/pictorial-multimodal-metaphor/
  8. Forceville, Charles and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
    2009Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
  9. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2002 “The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions.” InRené Dirven and Ralf Pörings (red.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 435–465. 10.1515/9783110219197.435
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.435 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    2015 “Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?” Journal of Pragmatics90, 73–76. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbs, Raymond
    2015 “Metaphor.” InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Dąbrowska, Ewa; Divjak, Dagmar. (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 167–189. 10.1515/9783110292022‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goossens, Louis
    1990 “Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action.” Cognitive Linguistics1–3 (1990), 323–340. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilpert, Martin
    2007 “Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar. A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms.” InRadden, Günter, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg and Peter Siemund (eds.). Aspects of Meaning Construction, 77–98. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.07hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.07hil [Google Scholar]
  14. Hitler, Adolf
    1933Mein Kampf. 23rd ed.Munich: Franz Eher Nachfolger.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodson, Gordon, Cara MacInnis and Kimberly C. Costello
    2014 “(Over)valuing “humanness” as an aggravator of intergroup prejudices and discrimination.” InPaul G. Bain, Jeroen Vaes, and Jacques-Philippe Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanizationNew York: Psychology Press, 86–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Knoblock, Natalia
    2017 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in the Ukrainian Conflict.” Presentation at: ICLC-14, Tartu, Estonia.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2015Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Krzeszowski, Tomasz P.
    1997Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, George and Mark Turner
    1989More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980a “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of PhilosophyVol.77, No.8, 453–486. 10.2307/2025464
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1980bMetaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, George
    1991 “Metaphor and War. The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf.” Peace ResearchVol.23, No.2/3, 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought 1993 Orthony, Andrew (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 202–251. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  24. Langacker, Ronald
    2008Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Littlemore, Jeanette
    2017 “Metonymy.” InBarbara Dancygier (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407–422. 10.1017/9781316339732.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.026 [Google Scholar]
  26. McDonald, Karl
    2017 “Slugs and melts: inside the language and culture of the Corbynite left.” Accessed27/10/2017https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/politics/slugs-melts-inside-language-culture-corbynite-left/
  27. Musolff, Andreas
    2007 “What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf.” Patterns of Prejudice, Vol.41:1 (2007), 21–43. 10.1080/00313220601118744
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220601118744 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012 “Immigrants and Parasites: The History of a Bio-social Metaphor.” InMichi Messer, Renee Schroeder and Ruth Wodak (eds.). Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Springer, 249–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2014 “Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors: Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies.” Journal of Language and Politics13:2, 218–233. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015 “Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media.” InMonika Kopytowska (ed.) Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres [Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1] 2015 41–56. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
  31. Nicholson, Rebecca
    2016 “‘Poor little snowflake’ – the defining insult of 2016.” Accessed31/10/2017https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/nov/28/snowflake-insult-disdain-young-people
  32. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group 2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  33. Reijnierse, Gudrun W.
    2017The value of deliberate metaphor. LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco and Alicia Galera-Masegosa
    2011 “Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation.” Language Value, Vol.3 (2011) 1–29. 10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Safire, William
    2008Safire’s Political Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Steen, Gerard J.
    2011 “From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor.” Metaphorik.de21, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2014 “Deliberate Metaphor Affords Conscious Metaphorical Cognition.” Cognitive Semiotics, Volume5, Issue1–2, 179–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015 “Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory.” Journal of Pragmatics90, 67–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  39. Steen, J. Gerard, Gudrun W. Reijnierse and Christian Burgers
    2014 “When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013).” PLoS One. 9(12). Accessed2/11/2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260786/. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113536
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113536 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sullivan, Karen
    2017 “Conceptual Metaphor.” In: Barbara Dancygier (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 385–406. 10.1017/9781316339732.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.025 [Google Scholar]
  41. Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Boroditsky
    2011 “Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning.” PLoS One. 23;6(2). Accessed2/11/2017journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid
    1996Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17073.pra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17073.pra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error