Constructing threat through quotes and historical analogies in the Czech and the US “Ukraine Discourse”

References

1. Antos, Gerd
   2017 “Fake News. Warum wir auf sie reinfallen. Oder: ‘Ich mach euch die Welt so wie mir gefällt’” Der Sprachdienst17 (1):1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bednarek, Monika
   2006 “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text and Talk26 (6): 635–660. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.027
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.027 [Google Scholar]
3. Bell, Allan
   1991 The language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boyd-Barrett, Oliver
   2017 “Ukraine, Mainstream Media and Conflict Propaganda.” Journalism Studies18 (8):1016–1034. 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1099461
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1099461 [Google Scholar]
5. Bublitz, Wolfram
   2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiguitous Meta-communicative Act.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
6. Bublitz, Wolfram, and Christian Hoffmann
   2011 “‘Three Men Using our Toilet all Day Withour Flushing – This May be the Worst Sentences I’ve Ever Read’: Quoting CMC.” InAnglistentag Saarbrücken 2010. Proceedings, edited byJoachim Frenk and Lena Steveker, 433–477. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cap, Piotr
   ed. 2005 Pragmatics Today. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cap, Piotr
   2006 Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cap, Piotr
   2008 “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics40 (1):17–41. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
10. Cap, Piotr
    2010 “Axiological Aspects of Proximization”. Journal of Pragmatics42 (2): 392–407. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008 [Google Scholar]
11. Cap, Piotr
    2013 Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
12. Cap, Piotr
    2014 “Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics70: 16–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008 [Google Scholar]
13. Cap, Piotr
    2015 “Crossing Symbolic Distanes in Politcal Discourse Space.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (3):313–329. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013481
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013481 [Google Scholar]
14. Cap, Piotr
    2017 The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59731‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1 [Google Scholar]
15. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
16. Chilton, Paul
    2014 Language, Space and Mind. The Conceptual Geomentry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
17. Chilton, Paul
    2017 “Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump.” Langage et societé 2017/2 (160–161): 237–249. 10.3917/ls.160.0237
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.160.0237 [Google Scholar]
18. Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerring
    1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language66 (4): 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
19. Cvrček, Václav, and Masako Fidler
    2019 “More than Keywords: Discourse Prominence Analysis of the Russian Web Portal-Sputnik Czech Republic.” InPolitical discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe, edited byMartina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurovič, 93–117. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.84.05cvr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.84.05cvr [Google Scholar]
20. Gerber, Theodore P., and Jane Zavisca
    2016 “Does Russian Propaganda Work?” The Washington Quarterly39 (2):79–98. 10.1080/0163660X.2016.1204398
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2016.1204398 [Google Scholar]
21. Haran, Oleksiy, and Petro Burkovskiy
    2017 “Ukraine’s Foreign Policy and the Role of the West.” InEastern Voices. Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West, edited byDaniel S. Hamilton and Stefen Meister, 51–76. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kopytowska, Monika
    2015a “Covering Conflict: Between Universality and Cultural Specificity in News Discourse, Genre and Journalistic Styles.” International Review of Pragmatics7: 309–339. 10.1163/18773109‑00702007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702007 [Google Scholar]
23. Kopytowska, Monika
    2015b “Mediating Identity, Ideology and Values in the Public Sphere: Towards a New Model of (Constructed) Social Reality.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics11 (2): 133–156.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kopytowska, Monika, and Lukasz Grabowski
    2017 “European security under threat: mediating the crisis and constructing the other.” InNational Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis: Doing and Undoing Europe, edited byChristian Karner and Monika Kopytowska, 83–108. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/978‑1‑78714‑513‑920171005
    https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-513-920171005 [Google Scholar]
25. Landert, Daniela
    2015 “Reportable Facts and a Personal Touch: The Functions of Direct Quotes in Online News.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 29–52. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110427561‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-003 [Google Scholar]
26. North Atlantic Treaty
    North Atlantic Treaty 1949 Accessible athttps://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/stock_publications/20120822_nato_treaty_en_light_2009.pdf
27. Piazza, Roberta
    2002 “The pragmatics of conducive questions in academic disourse.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (5): 509–227. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00038‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00038-8 [Google Scholar]
28. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 Voice in Political Discourse. Castro, Chávez, Bush and their Strategic Use of Language. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rock, Stephen R.
    2000 Appeasement in International Politics. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sakwa, Richard
    2015 Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Severinson Eklundh, Kerstin
    2010 “To Quote or not to Quote: Setting the Context for Computer-Mediated Dialogues.” Language@Internet7 (article 5).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Stenwall, Maija
    2008 “On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity -Tool for analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics40 (9):1569–1586. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.017 [Google Scholar]
33. Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
    1987 “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Scheams in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly50 (2):206–216. 10.2307/2786752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786752 [Google Scholar]
34. Tesař, Jan
    2014 Mnichovský komplex. Jeho příčiny a důsledky. Praha: Prostor.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tulmets, Elsa
    2018 “The West, the East and the Rest”. The Foreign Politicy orientations of Central Eastern European Countries.” InThe Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited byAdam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 295–306. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ullmann, Stefanie
    2019 “Epistemic Stancetaking and Speaker Objectificaton in a Spatio-Cognitive Discourse World.” Journal of Language and PoliticsAvailable athttps://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.17038.ull
    [Google Scholar]
37. Webber, Mark
    2017 “NATO Enlargement an the Post-Communist.” InThe Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited byAdam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 346–357. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315687681‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687681-27 [Google Scholar]
38. Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
    2008 “Proximisation, Common Ground and Assertion-Based Patterns for Legitimisation in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines2 (1): 31–48.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
    2013 Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wilson, Andrew
    2014 Ukraine Crisis. What it means for the West. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wilson, Andrew
    2018 “Explaining Ukraine.” InThe Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited byAdam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 39–52. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zaorálek, Lubomír
    2014 Crisis around Ukraine. InOtázky Václava Moravce [Questions of Václav Moravec], edited byVáclav Moravec. Website of Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs: https://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/o_ministerstvu/archivy/clanky_a_projevy_ministru/clanky_a_projevy_ministra_zaoralka_2014/x2014_03_02_krize_kolem_ukrajiny.html: Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]