Volume 17, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Heckles are an illegitimate, yet common way of commenting directly and immediately on what is being said at the lectern. However, (non-)verbal interjections can also be used to disconcert the speaker, thus scoring points within the parliamentary arena. In these cases, female delegates are often confronted with discriminatory remarks and comments that border on sexism and even misogyny. Based on the extensive literature on gender and discourse, the following paper will focus on gender-related heckles and analyse argumentative structures and topoi that are grounded in sexist stereotypes and conservative role-models. Presuming that these incidents are not isolated instances, the paper will compare and contrast several examples from around the world that have caught public attention.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bucholtz, Mary
    2003 “Theories of Discourse as Theories of Gender: Discourse Analysis in Language and Gender Studies.” InThe Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. byJanet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 43–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756942.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkhardt, Armin
    1992 “‘Das ist eine Frage des Intellekts, Frau Kollegin!‘ Zur Behandlung von Rednerinnen in deutschen Parlamenten.“ InDie Geschlechter im Gespräch. Kommunikation in Institutionen, ed. bySusanne Günthner, and Helga Kotthoff, 287–309. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978‑3‑476‑03400‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03400-7_13 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2005 „Deutsch im demokratischen Parlament. Formen und Funktionen der öffentlichen parlamentarischen Kommunikation.“ InSprache und Politik. Deutsch im demokratischen Staat, ed. byJörg Kilian, 85–98. Mannheim: Duden.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, Deborah, and Sylvia Shaw
    2016Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave.10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58752‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Childs, Sarah
    2004 “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations6: 3–19.10.1111/j.1467‑856X.2004.00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00124.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Deaux, Kay, and Laurie L. Lewis
    1983 “Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components.” Psychological Documents13: 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dijk, Teun A. van
    1984Prejudice in Discourse. An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.v.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. 1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society4 (2): 249–283.10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1998Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    2003Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511791147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fairclough, Norman
    2013Language and Power. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fracchiolla, Béatrice
    2011 „Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate – The Royal-Sarkozy debate.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 2480–2488.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grisdale, Mackenzie
    2011 “Heckling in the House of Commons.” Canadian Parliamentary Review34 (3): 38–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haines, Elizabeth L., Kay Deaux, and Nicole Lofaro
    2016 “The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014.” Psychology of Women Quarterly40 (3): 1–11.10.1177/0361684316634081
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081 [Google Scholar]
  15. Henderson, Ailsa
    2007Hierarchies of Belonging. National Identity and Political Culture in Scotland and Quebec. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Holtz-Bacha, Christina
    2009 “Politikerinnen-Bilder im internationalen Vergleich.“ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte50: 3–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ilie, Cornelia
    2004 “Insulting as (un) parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A rhetorical approach.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. byPaul Bayley, 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012 “Representing gender in parliamentary dialogue: Are there any cross-cultural stereotypes?” In(Re)presentations and Dialogue, ed. byFrançois Cooren, and Alain Letourneau, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.16.04ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.16.04ili [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 “Gendering confrontational rhetoric: discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments.” Democratization20 (3): 501–521.10.1080/13510347.2013.786547
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.786547 [Google Scholar]
  20. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
    Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) 2016Sexism, harassment and violence against women parliamentarians. Issues Brief October 2016. Online available: www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/issuesbrief-e.pdf [9.5.2017]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), and United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women
    Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), and United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women 2017Women in Politics: 2017. Online available: https://beta.ipu.org/resources/publications/infographics/2017-03/women-in-politics-2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, Jennifer J.
    2016 “Talk ‘Like a Man’: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics14 (3): 625–642.10.1017/S1537592716001092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001092 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1992Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kite, Mary E., Kay Deaux, and Elizabeth L. Haines
    2008 “Gender Stereotypes.” InPsychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories, ed. byFlorence L. Denmark, and Michele A. Paludi, 205–236. London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, Robin
    2003 “Language, Gender, and Politics: Putting ‘Women’ and ‘Power’ in the Same Sentence.” InThe Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. byJanet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 161–178. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756942.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2007 “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis.” Critical Discourse Studies4 (2): 141–164.10.1080/17405900701464816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lippmann, Walter
    1922Public Opinion. Verfügbar unter: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6456 [27.05.2017].
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lovenduski, Joni
    2005Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris
    2003 “Westminster Women: the Politics of Presence.” Political Studies51: 84–102.10.1111/1467‑9248.00414
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00414 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maloney, Ryan
    2014 “Chrystia Freeland Heckled In House, Commentator Tells Her To Use ’Big Girl Voice’ (VIDEO).” The Huffington Post Canada, 02.042014 Online available: www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/02/04/chrystia-freeland-question-period-video_n_4726222.html [22.05.2017]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Millar, Matthew D.
    2014 “I’m sorry for my inappropriate tweet to MP Chrystia Freeland.” The Vancouver Observer, 05.022014 Online available: www.vancouverobserver.com/politics/commentary/im-sorry-my-inappropriate-tweet-mp-chyrstia-freeland [22.05.2017]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Murray, Rainbow
    (ed.) 2010Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Randall, Vicky
    1987Women and Politics: An International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.1007/978‑1‑349‑18836‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18836-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ripley, Will, and Edmund S. Henry
    2014 “Outrage follows sexist outburst at Tokyo assembly meeting.” CNN, 20.062014 Online available: edition.cnn.com/2014/06/20/world/asia/japan-assembly-sexist-outburst/ [23.05.2017].
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sarcinelli, Ulrich
    2011Politische Kommunikation in Deutschland Medien und Politikvermittlung im demokratischen System. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑531‑93018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93018-3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shaw, Sylvia
    2000 “Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates.” Discourse and Society11 (3): 401–418.10.1177/0957926500011003006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011003006 [Google Scholar]
  38. Silverstein, Michael
    1979 “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” InThe Elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, ed. byPaul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1997 “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse & Society8 (2): 165–187.10.1177/0957926597008002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stopfner, Maria
    2013aStreitkultur im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2013b “Parliamentary heckling in the Austrian National Council.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique AppliquéeNo spécialII: 89–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2017 „Institutionen als Handlungsfeld I: Legislative.“ InHandbuch Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft, ed. byKersten Sven Roth, Martin Wengeler, and Alexander Ziem, 371–397. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110296310‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296310-017 [Google Scholar]
  43. Talbot, Mary
    2003 “Gender Stereotypes: Reproduction and Challenge.” InThe Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. byJanet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 468–486. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756942.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tannen, Deborah
    1996Gender and Discourse. Featuring a new essay on talk at work. New York: Oxford UP.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. UN Secretary-General
    UN Secretary-General 2013Measures taken and progress achieved in the promotion of women and political participation: Report of the Secretary-General. Document symbol: A/68/184. Online available: dag.un.org/handle/11176/272858 [09.05.2017].
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Walsh, Clare
    2013Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Weatherall, Ann
    2002Gender, Language and Discourse. Hove: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder
    2002Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman
    1987 “Doing gender.” Gender and Society1 (2): 125–151.10.1177/0891243287001002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wodak, Ruth
    2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2015 “Gender and Language: Cultural Concerns” InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol 9, ed. byJames D. Wright, 698–703. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.64018‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64018-7 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wodak, Ruth, and Brigitta Busch
    2004 “Approaches to media texts.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Media Studies, ed. byJohn D. H. Downing, Denis McQuail, Philip Schlesinger, and Ellen Wartella, 105–122. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412976077.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976077.n6 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wodak, Ruth, and Gilbert Weiß
    2005 “Analyzing European Union discourses: Theories and applications”. InA New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. byRuth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 121–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.13.10wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13.10wod [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argumentation; gender; gender stereotypes; parliamentary discourse; politics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error